Changelog

Advocacy changelog

Every tracked product and technology change at Advocacy, dated and sourced. Each entry names the change, its impact and the live source it was graded from.

Product and technology changes only. Funding rounds, valuations, partnerships and awards are excluded, and an acquisition appears only where there is direct product impact. Every entry cites a live retrieved source. Changes to the index's own records are not changelog material; a corrected record carries its own dates.

Follow this changelog by RSS

Free for your reader, newsletter or automation tool. One feed covers the whole index, and every category has its own.

All feeds and terms
A
AdvocacySep 25, 2026Vendor
Impact
Medium
Verification
Verified
Pricing / packaging

Alongside Promptless, Advocacy introduced a new pricing model. Firms open a matter for a nominal fee and then pay a la carte only for the AI generated contributions they accept into that matter.

Buyer relevance. Firms pay for accepted work rather than seats or usage, so rejected AI output costs nothing and spend can be tied to a specific matter and client. No price points were published, so buyers still need a quote.

Axis: Commercial TransparencyView source
A
AdvocacySep 25, 2026Vendor
Impact
High
Verification
Verified
Product / capability

Advocacy released Promptless, which proposes litigation tasks on its own when a document production arrives, opposing counsel sends a letter or a deadline approaches, drawing on connected documents, email, calendars and dockets. It classifies incoming documents and flags contradictions with the case theory, runs multistep research including EDGAR, drafts outlines and edits, and calculates deadlines from docket entries showing the governing rule and arithmetic. Every proposed action stays unconfirmed until an attorney accepts it, and the platform keeps an audit trail of human and AI contributions tied to the team's approved reading of each document. Promptless is model agnostic, so firms can bring their own model, and teams set per matter and per client which work the AI may do, where approval is required, which sections stay lawyer only and what information the AI may see.

Buyer relevance. Litigation teams get AI work started without writing prompts while keeping attorney approval as a hard gate, which matters for supervision duties. The contribution level audit trail gives partners, general counsel and insurers a record of who directed each judgment.

Axis: Autonomy and Oversight ModelView source
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 303 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
September 26, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746