Changelog

Avvoka changelog

Every tracked product and technology change at Avvoka, dated and sourced. Each entry names the change, its impact and the live source it was graded from.

Product and technology changes only. Funding rounds, valuations, partnerships and awards are excluded, and an acquisition appears only where there is direct product impact. Every entry cites a live retrieved source. Changes to the index's own records are not changelog material; a corrected record carries its own dates.

Follow this changelog by RSS

Free for your reader, newsletter or automation tool. One feed covers the whole index, and every category has its own.

All feeds and terms
A
AvvokaOct 13, 2026Vendor
Impact
Medium
Verification
Verified
Product / capability

Avvoka opened early access to headless templating, which lets an AI assistant connected to Avvoka build document templates as well as draft from them. A user hands the assistant a Word document or an existing template and describes how it should work, and the assistant sets up the questions, conditions, repeating sections and calculated values, then saves a draft in Avvoka. The release names Claude and Copilot for early access, with Harvey and Legora to follow, though its availability note lists only customers already using the Claude integration.

Buyer relevance. Template building has long been the slow part of document automation, and this moves it into the assistant lawyers already use. Nothing changes for end users until the team reviews and publishes the draft template.

Axis: Autonomy and Oversight ModelView source
A
AvvokaSep 2, 2026Vendor
Impact
High
Verification
Partially Verified
Product / capability

Avvoka launched Curate, a standalone product that reads a firm's historical transaction documents, extracts the clause variations that performed best, and generates templates from them. The output feeds back into Avvoka's automation and AI drafting workflows.

Buyer relevance. Template maintenance is the unglamorous cost center of knowledge management, and most templates drift from what the firm actually negotiates. Building them from executed documents rather than from a partner's memory is the interesting claim, and it is testable against a firm's own back catalog.

Axis: AI CentralityView source
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 462 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 19, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746