Changelog

Everlaw changelog

Every tracked product and technology change at Everlaw, dated and sourced. Each entry names the change, its impact and the live source it was graded from.

Product and technology changes only. Funding rounds, valuations, partnerships and awards are excluded, and an acquisition appears only where there is direct product impact. Every entry cites a live retrieved source. Changes to the index's own records are not changelog material; a corrected record carries its own dates.

Follow this changelog by RSS

Free for your reader, newsletter or automation tool. One feed covers the whole index, and every category has its own.

All feeds and terms
E
EverlawSep 17, 2026Vendor
Impact
High
Verification
Verified
Integration / interoperability

Everlaw released a plugin for ChatGPT Enterprise, one of the partner plugins that went live alongside OpenAI's Astra for Law on 17 September. Legal teams can search, query and analyze case evidence held in Everlaw from inside ChatGPT. It works on the substance of the documents rather than only their metadata, and runs against the permissioned data already in Everlaw rather than a copy.

Buyer relevance. Of the eDiscovery plugins released this week, this one goes furthest into the evidence itself. That is exactly why a litigation team should ask one question before switching it on: where the retrieved text goes once it enters ChatGPT, and whether the firm's ChatGPT Enterprise settings satisfy the protective order on the matter.

Axis: Practice Systems Integration DepthView source
E
EverlawAug 27, 2026Vendor
Impact
High
Verification
Verified
Integration / interoperability

Everlaw launched a Model Context Protocol integration with Harvey. The connection lets users query Everlaw's evidence, project data and reporting information conversationally from inside Harvey's interface, rather than moving between the two systems.

Buyer relevance. Mutual customers can point Harvey's drafting and analysis at verified case evidence already sitting in Everlaw. It closes the gap between the legal AI layer a firm drafts in and the eDiscovery platform that holds the underlying record.

Axis: Practice Systems Integration DepthView source
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 462 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 19, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746