Corlytics vs CUBE: how they compare in 2026
Corlytics and CUBE both turn the flow of global regulation into obligations a financial firm can act on, and large banks weigh them for the same regulatory change budget. They part ways on what comes after the obligation is found. Corlytics carries it into the firm's own control environment. Obligations are mapped to policies and controls, gaps come back with suggested wording for the firm's experts to validate, and policy drafting, compliance monitoring and nonfinancial risk run on one data model. CUBE builds outward from its regulatory data. It captures publications from more than 10,000 issuing bodies in 100 languages and joins obligations to more than 300,000 controls contributed by banks for peer benchmarking. Agentic coworkers inside RegPlatform handle triage, research, control rewriting and enforcement analysis. Corlytics' longest named deployment is the FCA's Intelligent Handbook, live since 2017. CUBE publishes its customer terms and Corlytics does not, and RegConnect carries CUBE's intelligence into a firm's GRC platform in both directions.
At a glance
All 15 axes, side by side
The same grid applied to every vendor in the index, graded from public sources. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.
AI Centrality
How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.
Machine learning does three jobs on every incoming document: it decides what the document is about, condenses it, and connects it to related material. Regulatory notices, rules and enforcement actions are classified against Corlytics' universal regulatory taxonomy, long texts are summarized, and similar items are matched across datasets to flag duplication and feed gap analysis. Obligations Management goes further. Semantic parsing strips introductory and suggestive text from a rule to leave a set of action items. Specialized models map those obligations to a firm's policies, controls and products and consolidate the overlaps, and large language models propose wording that would close a gap in a policy or control. Policy Management drafts new policy content with AI, and Regulatory Risk Analytics runs Corlytics' own risk models over enforcement data. The machine learning framework that tags handbook provisions in real time was first built with the FCA in 2016 and 2017. Without the models, the version tracking, change packages, approval workflows, controls mapping and monitoring plans would still run as a regulatory workflow system.
CUBE's regulatory content would stand without the models. Its 250 regulatory experts review and curate it, and Powered By licenses that content to other platforms on its own. The models do the processing at scale. Proprietary AI trained only on regulatory content classifies, extracts, maps and links publications from more than 10,000 issuing bodies into about 10 million structured obligations. Inside RegPlatform, agentic coworkers triage change for a firm, answer questions in natural language, rewrite and generate controls, and analyze enforcement actions.
Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure
Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.
Every alert, summary and obligation stays linked to the regulatory text it came from. The Regulation Library keeps laws, rules, handbooks and guidance in their original PDF, XML or HTML form, so second and third line teams read the documents they already know. It breaks each one down to obligation level. A version manager shows the current text of a rule beside the previous version, with changes lined in red and green, and keeps the full history. Obligations mapped to policies and controls point back to that source. Quality control is described as a process rather than a number. Subject matter experts at Corlytics validate the enriched content, and in Obligations Management the client's own experts review extracted and mapped obligations before gap reports go out. In the FCA handbook project, machine tagging ran with a review, approve or reject step and a full audit trail. No accuracy rate or test result is given for classification, summaries, extraction or mapping.
Every coworker works from CUBE's own curated regulatory intelligence rather than the open web, and CUBE describes the output as sourced and auditable. The Analysis Coworker returns structured answers with their sources across applicable updates and the laws, rules and regulations in RegBook, and keeps the research record in the platform. Content is versioned, and each obligation keeps its lineage back to the regulatory text. No accuracy rate for classification, obligation extraction or coworker answers is published, and no test set or benchmark sits behind the AI.
Autonomy and Oversight Model
What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.
The platform automates the reading and routing of regulation and leaves decisions to people. Content is collected, classified and sent to the right business lines and teams without manual triage. Extraction and mapping run automatically, then the client's subject matter experts validate the results before gap reports and attestations are produced. Gap analysis returns suggested wording for a policy or control rather than changing it, and users are prompted to revisit mappings when a rule changes. Change management turns a regulatory change into a change package with owners, tasks and alerts at each stage, and records offline gap analysis alongside it. Policies pass through configurable multistage approvals. For the FCA's handbook, machine tagging ran inside a four eyes workflow in which users could review, approve or reject each change. No confidence level is described at which the models hold back output, and nothing covers what happens once a wrong mapping has reached a policy or control.
The coworkers work inside RegPlatform beside compliance and risk teams, surfacing what is relevant and drafting the next step, and CUBE calls their output explainable. The Priorities Coworker ranks developments by certainty and applicability and keeps a full audit trail of its assessment decisions. Regulatory Inventory logs the reasoning when it maps a change to entities, jurisdictions and business lines, and workflow carries tasks, ownership and approvals through each stage. Intel pairs the AI with review by CUBE's regulatory experts. What a coworker may do without a person approving it, and what happens after a wrong assessment, are not described.
Operational and Outcome Evidence
Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.
The longest running named deployment is the FCA. A pilot began in September 2016 and the Intelligent Handbook went live on 10 May 2017, with Corlytics' taxonomy and machine learning tagging covering more than 18,000 provisions. Other FCA functions use it too, including to speed up firm onboarding. Arbuthnot Latham, a London private and merchant bank, is named in a case study about centralizing group policies, with standard templates, single sign on and staff attestation among its requirements. The International Compliance Association launched an alert tool on Corlytics feeds in June 2025 for more than 30,000 members, and GRC Report began carrying its feeds in September 2026. Six more case studies are anonymous. Corlytics puts the efficiency gain at 25% for the compliance monitoring and risk insight teams of a European tier 1 bank. A crypto exchange went live in six weeks, and a United States investment manager with more than one trillion in assets replaced older third party tools with it. Client logos also include FINRA, ING, abrdn, Block, Natixis, Patria, SCOR, Swiss Re and Vontobel. The headline claims, 40% of the world's 30 largest banks as clients and policy approvals 50% faster, come without a named source.
CUBE says it serves many of the world's largest financial institutions, with operations across Europe, the United States, Canada, Asia and Australia. It puts its scale at about 10 million data points processed a year, 250 regulatory experts and around 1,000 staff in 10 offices. No customer is named. The one outcome figure comes from early customer testing of the Priorities Coworker, which cut noise by 80 to 90 percent, with no customer, date or method attached. IBM embedded CUBE's regulatory intelligence in a Regulatory Horizon Scanning capability for watsonx.governance, announced in September 2026, as a partnership with no deployment figures.
Privilege and Confidentiality Posture
How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.
Each client's policies, obligation registers, impact assessments and control mappings sit in the platform, and the terms that govern that content are not public. No customer agreement, data processing agreement or confidentiality schedule is published. Nothing public says how client content is used, whether it trains the models, or how one client's data is kept apart from another's. The June 2026 privacy notice is the only data document. It covers personal data about people outside the customer relationship, such as website visitors, prospects and suppliers, though its reader list also names software users. It describes access controls, user authentication, encryption, staff confidentiality and regular security testing. ISO/IEC 42001 certifies how Corlytics governs its own AI, and ISO/IEC 27001 covers its information security management. Neither is a statement to clients about how their content may be used.
The Global Terms and Conditions for CUBE Services, January 2026, leave customer data owned by the customer and license CUBE to use and store it only as far as needed to perform the agreement. Customer data counts as the customer's confidential information. Clause 10.3 limits a compelled disclosure to what a court or regulator orders, with written notice first where CUBE is able to give it. The data security exhibit commits CUBE to a written information security program aligned with a recognized standard. No term addresses privilege, work product or segregation between customers, and the license lets CUBE keep customer data after the agreement ends.
UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture
Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.
The product sells interpretation as well as information. The platform extracts obligations, filters them to a firm's activities and jurisdictions, suggests how a policy or control should change, and drafts policy text. In one UK bank's case, a third party consultancy used rules supplied by Corlytics to complete a rules mapping exercise the bank had agreed with its conduct regulator. The website legal notice says site content is general guidance that does not replace regulatory, compliance, risk analytics or other professional advice, and supplies it as is. It governs the website rather than the platform. No public statement says how platform output relates to legal or compliance advice, or who is responsible for checking it before a firm relies on it. The client expert validation step in Obligations Management is the clearest description of who signs off.
Clause 12.1.4 of the Intel subscription terms says the services are not financial, tax, accounting, legal, compliance or other professional advice, and CUBE disclaims damages from decisions made in reliance on them. The Global Terms behind RegPlatform exclude liability for decisions a customer makes on the services and content, without the same statement. The website terms call site content general information rather than advice. CUBE's own pitch is helping teams track, interpret and act on regulatory change, while its home page line is that CUBE brings the insights and the customer decides. Nothing addresses the supervision or competence of the lawyers and compliance staff relying on the output, and no jurisdiction limit is named.
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.
An AI management system certified to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 covers the whole business. A-LIGN issued the certification in May 2025 after a two stage audit that found zero nonconformities, and Waystone Compliance Solutions advised on the program. The scope covers every product line. The program is framed around bias mitigation, risk and resilience controls across the AI lifecycle, and mapped to the EU AI Act and the UK National AI Strategy. Later releases add the NIST framework and OECD principles. Oisin Boydell, Chief Data Officer, speaks for the AI program, and founder John Byrne describes an AI by design strategy that reaches six competencies of the business. Product pages describe a science based method, ensemble models and expert validation at each stage. Test results are not published, so nothing shows how output quality varies across languages, jurisdictions or document types.
The AI is described as proprietary, trained only on regulatory content and native to the product rather than added on, with coworker output explainable, sourced and auditable. No AI policy, set of principles, framework, accountable owner or testing before release is published, and nothing covers uneven output across jurisdictions, languages or firm types. CUBE's intelligence feeds IBM's watsonx.governance, a tool enterprises use to govern their own AI, which says nothing about how CUBE governs its models.
AI Safety and Data Stewardship
Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.
Clients' regulatory content, obligation registers and policies live in Corlytics' cloud platform, and no published document sets retention, deletion or subprocessor terms for them. The privacy notice covers personal data only. Corlytics keeps that data for the life of an active contract, or as legal and business needs require, then deletes or anonymizes it, with the detail in an unpublished Data Retention Policy. Breaches are notified without undue delay and reported to the supervisory authority under an unpublished Data Breach Management Policy. Luca Dalla Giacoma is the named Data Protection Officer. The same notice lists access controls, authentication, encryption, IP anonymization, network security, business continuity and disaster recovery, and regular testing. It names recipients only by category: staff, technical service providers acting as processors or subprocessors, authorities such as HMRC, professional advisers and buyers of the business. The ISO/IEC 27001 certificate covers the information security management behind the service.
The privacy exhibit, March 2026, has CUBE process personal data only as the agreement requires or on written instruction, amend, transfer or delete it on request, and keep it confidential. Either party reports a security breach within 72 hours, and CUBE tells no third party about a breach without the customer's consent unless the law requires it. An annex lists the material subprocessors, and the customer gets five days to object to a new one. Under the Global Terms, CUBE backs up customer data daily and keeps only the latest copy, and at the end of the agreement it deletes or returns personal data at the customer's option. Other customer data may be kept after termination, and no retention period is stated.
AI Liability and Recourse
What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.
The only public legal document is a website notice. It supplies site content as is, disclaims accuracy, timeliness and completeness, and excludes liability for direct, indirect, consequential and other damages arising from the site. The client application sits behind a sign in, and no customer agreement, order form or service terms is published, so the platform's warranties, indemnities and liability limits are not public. Clients use the output in front of regulators. Firms rely on Corlytics mappings to evidence compliance and attest to supervisors, and one UK bank used Corlytics rules in a rules mapping exercise agreed with its conduct regulator. No public term says who carries the loss if a mapping, summary or suggested policy change turns out to be wrong.
Clause 11.2 of the Global Terms has CUBE defend and indemnify the customer against third party claims that the services infringe intellectual property. The remedies are to procure a right, modify or replace the services, or terminate and refund unused fees, with exclusions for freely available content, modification by others, misuse and unapproved combinations. Clause 12.4 excludes lost profits, lost data and consequential loss and caps CUBE at the fees for the contract year, rising to three times those fees for breach of confidentiality and for indemnity claims. Clause 4.1 warrants that the services are performed with the skill and care of the industry and in line with the documentation, with correction or reperformance as the remedy. Accuracy, completeness and timeliness of content are disclaimed, CUBE carries no liability for decisions the customer makes on it, and no insurance is stated.
Practice Systems Integration Depth
How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.
The platform is built to sit beside a firm's GRC stack and feed it. The Regulation Library is described as fully API ready, with an Open API for major GRC platforms. Regulatory Monitoring, Obligations Management and Compliance Monitoring each send data or outcomes into a firm's GRC environment, and an investment manager client uses the data to feed its internal compliance newsletter. The FCA handbook project connected to the regulator's existing content repository, and Taxonomy Manager for Regulators links digital handbooks to online portals and obligation registers. The partners page shows logos for IBM, ServiceNow, Solidatus and Chainalysis among others. Inside the platform, controls mapping links obligations to a firm's policies, standards, procedures, controls and processes, and taxonomy routing sends content to the right business lines and teams. No connector is named, and there is no public API reference or integration guide that shows what syncs and in which direction.
RegConnect, CUBE's API module, connects RegPlatform with GRC platforms, policy tools and internal systems in both directions. Authorized applications pull regulatory intelligence, trigger platform functions and push data back, under role based authentication with every access logged. Links between regulatory content and downstream policies, processes and controls stay live, so connected items are flagged for review when a rule changes. Intel content reaches other systems through a REST API with a developer portal, and Powered By licenses content to platform builders. IBM's watsonx.governance is the one named destination. The developer documentation is not public, and no GRC platform is named.
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.
Delivery runs from Corlytics' own cloud, the environment named in its ISO/IEC 27001 scope. Implementations run remotely across time zones, led by a dedicated implementation team, and Corlytics says go lives can take a matter of weeks. The security page lists geo specific hosting among its principles. The hosting provider, regions and tenancy model are not named, and no choice of location is offered. The only geography in the privacy notice concerns personal data transfers outside the UK and EEA, which rely on adequacy decisions, approved contracts or other safeguards. Group companies in Ireland, England, Portugal and the United States describe where Corlytics operates rather than where client data sits.
Annex A of the privacy exhibit sets out where CUBE runs. Enterprise services sit in two data centers in Great Britain, Datum in Farnborough and Vantage in Newport. Microsoft Azure hosts Intel and Hub AI in the United Kingdom and EU North, RegRoom in the United States and Oden in an eastern United States region. Group companies give technical and operational support under an intragroup agreement carrying EU standard contractual clauses and the UK transfer addendum. No customer choice of region is described, and where processing happens is not separated from where data is stored.
Security Certifications and Trust Center
Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.
Three certifications are named. ISO/IEC 27001 covers all activities of Corlytics Limited in delivering data and software for legislation, regulation and document management services from its cloud solutions. A SOC 2 Type 1 report from the independent CPA firm Thoropass tests control design against all five Trust Services Criteria at a point in time. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 came from A-LIGN in May 2025. An Information Security Manager runs the security program, whose principles include secure development, testing and quality assurance, continuous integration testing, infrastructure controls, geo specific hosting and incident response. One reinsurer cleared Corlytics through its own digital governance process as an approved third party supplier before rollout. No report or certificate is posted, and the security page invites readers to get in touch for more on its procedures.
No ISO 27001, SOC 2 or other certification is claimed on CUBE's site or in its agreements, and no auditor or report is named. The data security exhibit commits it to a written information security program that adopts or aligns with an industry standard, with the ISO 27000 family, SOC 2 Type 2 and CIS benchmarks given as examples. The privacy exhibit mentions a trust center portal as one possible route for subprocessor updates, and no trust center is linked from the site.
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.
The AI is presented as the company's own work. Ensemble models with expert oversight handle classification and summaries, and specialized machine learning models handle obligation mapping. Gap remediation suggestions come from what Corlytics calls expert LLMs, and handbook tagging runs on a machine learning framework first built with the FCA. No model, model family or provider is named for any of them, and whether a third party foundation model is called, or where inference runs, is not stated. The ISO/IEC 42001 management system covers every product line, with no list of the models it governs and no commitment to tell clients when they change.
CUBE describes its AI as proprietary and trained only on regulatory content, classifying, extracting, mapping and linking publications in 100 languages. Its coworkers draw on regulatory and network intelligence that, in CUBE's words, generic AI models are not trained on. No model, model family or outside model provider is named, and nothing says whether a general purpose model sits behind the coworkers' natural language answers. Microsoft Azure appears as a hosting subprocessor, and no notice of model changes is committed.
Commercial Transparency
Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.
Buying Corlytics starts with a demo and a sales conversation, and no prices, plan names or units of charge are published. The platform is modular. In its case studies, clients start with Regulatory Monitoring and add Risk Analytics, Compliance Management or Clausematch policy management, and one payments provider added two modules within a month of going live. Implementation is run by a dedicated team, with an implementation manager for each client, in sprints. A crypto exchange went live in six weeks, while one reinsurer's rollout ran through requirements and design, a proof of concept and approval as a third party supplier. Modules and configuration can be added after go live. No figure is published for licenses, implementation or the work of building a firm's taxonomy and obligation register.
No price is published, and every product page routes to a demo or a conversation with a CUBE expert. Its Global Terms set the commercial shape. Fees are set for each contract year in an order form that names the number of authorized users, and invoices follow the order form's payment terms. Unless the order form fixes the fees, they rise 5 percent at the start of each contract year, late amounts carry 1.5 percent a month, and the agreement renews unless either side gives 60 days' notice. Intel has its own subscription terms, version 1.1 of June 2026. Nothing states what implementation adds.
Firm and Practice Coverage
Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.
Buyers are regulated financial firms and the regulators that oversee them, with a second line of business in health and life sciences. Sector pages cover global and private banks, hedge fund and investment managers, global insurers, payments and big tech, and regulators. Case studies add a reinsurer, a crypto exchange, a UK retail and commercial bank, a London merchant bank and a United States investment manager. Regulators buy a Taxonomy Manager edition that turns handbooks into machine readable, searchable databases with visual maps by theme, product and business line. Health and life sciences clients get regulatory sensing, guidance assessment, digital call for comments assessments and a repository that supports submissions. Financial services modules cover horizon scanning, the regulation library, obligations, change management, controls mapping, policy management, compliance monitoring, regulatory risk analytics and nonfinancial risk across operational, conduct, third party, cyber, AI and governance risk. Product pages speak to compliance, risk and audit teams and their chief officers, and case studies show legal teams working alongside them. No limit by firm size, jurisdiction or language is stated.
Highly regulated industries are CUBE's focus, with solution pages for banking, financial services, insurance, corporates and partners. RegPlatform serves enterprise compliance and risk teams across the first and second lines, and Intel targets fast growing regulated businesses. Oden covers state by state notices and guidance for American insurers writing commercial or personal lines, and Powered By serves platform builders, information businesses and technology providers. Coverage spans regulatory publications, guidance and enforcement actions from more than 10,000 issuing bodies in 250 countries and territories and 100 languages. No practice area or obligation type is named as out of scope.
The 12 legal signals, side by side
Recorded rather than graded. These are the questions a practitioner has to answer before a tool touches a client matter, and the answers are taken from public material only.
Client Data in Training
Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?
No customer agreement, data processing agreement or subscription terms is public, and no policy page states whether client content is used to train or improve Corlytics' models. The privacy notice covers personal data about people other than customers and application users, and the security page describes controls without mentioning model training.
The AI works directly on client material. Gap analysis reads a firm's own policies and control descriptions before its language models suggest changes, and Policy Management drafts new policy text with AI inside the firm's own documents.
Specialized mapping models and an ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system sit beside this. Neither is tied to a published statement about the policies, obligation registers and impact assessments a client keeps in the platform, or about what any model provider may keep.
Clause 3.1 of the Global Terms for CUBE Services, January 2026, leaves customer data owned by the customer. CUBE, its affiliates and subcontractors may use and store it only to the extent needed to carry out the agreement, including keeping it after termination. Clause 8.1 lets CUBE use aggregated service usage data to improve the services, and that data excludes customer data, personal data and confidential information.
The terms bar customers from training AI on CUBE's services or content and say nothing about CUBE training on customer data.
Prompt and Output Retention
How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?
No retention period is set for a client's uploaded policies, impact assessments, generated summaries or other working content, and nothing says whether a client can set one. The only retention statement covers personal data. It runs for the life of an active contract, or as legal obligations and legitimate business needs require, after which the data is deleted or anonymized. A Data Retention Policy holds the detail and is not public.
History is kept by design. Policy Management keeps version control and a full audit trail of every action, the Regulation Library keeps every version of each rule, and change packages record each stage of a change. AI summaries, gap remediation suggestions and drafted policy text sit inside that history with no stated retention period or deletion route.
Under clause 3.1 of the Global Terms, CUBE may retain customer data after the agreement ends. Clause 3.2 has it back up customer data daily and keep only the latest copy during the term. At termination, clause 13.3.3 has CUBE delete or return personal data at the customer's option, and the privacy exhibit has it delete personal data on a reasonable request at any time. No retention period is stated for customer data or for what the coworkers produce.
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?
Separation between clients, and between business units inside a client, is not described. Policy Management offers granular permissions on document sections and multistage approval workflows, and Taxonomy Manager for Regulators supports secure multiuser access. Those are access controls inside a client's own workspace.
The taxonomy tools route regulatory content to business lines, teams and individuals according to the firm's own taxonomy. That scopes content by relevance rather than by an enforced boundary.
Neither feature addresses whether AI classification, mapping or gap suggestions draw only on a client's own content, or whether clients share infrastructure.
RegConnect gives connected applications role based authentication, so only applications with the right permissions reach RegPlatform data, and each access is logged. Regulatory Inventory and Groups map change to a firm's entities, jurisdictions and business lines, and workflow assigns ownership and approvals. How access is separated between users, teams or business units inside a customer is not described.
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?
The privacy notice, effective June 2026, says that if Corlytics is asked to disclose personal data under a legal request or court order, it will take legal advice before responding. It also lists authorities such as HMRC among the recipients of personal data. The notice names five group companies as controllers, in Ireland, England, Portugal and the United States.
Both passages concern the personal data of named groups, such as software users and website visitors, and neither promises to tell the client. Nothing public addresses a court order or regulator demand for the content a firm holds in the platform, and no customer agreement is published that could carry a notice commitment.
Clause 10.3 of the Global Terms lets either party disclose confidential information only as far as a court or regulator orders. Where it is able to, the disclosing party informs the other in writing first so the other can seek a protective order, and customer data counts as the customer's confidential information. The privacy exhibit adds notice of any law requiring CUBE to process or disclose personal data, unless the law forbids notice. No transparency report is published.
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?
Coverage is described by type, scale and global reach rather than by source. Corlytics collects regulatory notices, rules, guidance, handbooks and enforcement actions automatically from regulators worldwide, and cites about 30 million pages of regulation a year in multiple languages. Its September 2026 partnership release speaks of thousands of regulators, and one bank's risk analysis drew on thousands of enforcement documents.
The Regulation Library holds a baseline of laws, regulations, handbooks and guidance across global jurisdictions, kept in original formats and broken down to obligation level. Content is added by market: one reinsurer's rollout planned Latin American regulatory data as its next addition. No regulator list, publisher, data supplier or license basis is published, and no update schedule is given beyond real time collection.
Part of what clients receive is Corlytics' own work, such as enforcement analysis, risk models and AI summaries beside the primary text.
CUBE captures regulatory publications, guidance and enforcement actions from more than 10,000 issuing bodies across 250 countries and territories in 100 languages, follows about 150,000 sources, and counts its coverage as 750 jurisdictions. Under its Global Terms the content comes from freely and publicly available sources and third party providers, which CUBE compiles, translates, tags and processes. Beside it sits a dataset of more than 300,000 real bank controls contributed by financial institutions. No issuing body, supplier or license is named.
Good Law Verification
Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?
Rule currency is handled inside the platform rather than through a licensed treatment service. The Regulation Version Manager tracks updates to live regulations and keeps a full version history, with side by side comparison of previous and current text and red and green lining of the changes.
When a rule changes, users are prompted to update the policies and controls mapped to it, and change management routes the update to impact assessment and gap analysis. Controls mapping carries the change through to every linked control, which Corlytics calls dynamic traceability.
Nothing states how quickly a regulator's publication reaches the library, or how accurately changes are detected.
Tracking a rule's later state is the core of the product. Horizon Scanning follows change in every country, territory and published language, content is structured and versioned, and Regulatory Inventory maps each change to the entities, jurisdictions and business lines it affects. When a regulation changes, RegConnect flags the policies, processes and controls linked to it in connected systems. No lag between a regulator publishing and the platform reflecting it is stated.
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?
What the platform does when a model cannot classify, summarize, extract or map with confidence is not described. No confidence value, coverage flag or low certainty marker appears for any AI step, including the language model gap suggestions and AI policy drafting.
People review output at set points instead. Corlytics' experts validate enriched content, the client's experts validate obligation results, and in the FCA handbook project users could review, approve or reject each machine tagged change in a four eyes workflow. Those reviews cover every item rather than being triggered by model uncertainty, and nothing in the platform marks which outputs a person has already reviewed.
Gap analysis returns suggestions rather than edits, which leaves acceptance to the user.
The Priorities Coworker ranks regulatory developments by certainty and applicability for a firm, and coworker answers come back with their sources. No path is described for a classification, mapping or answer the system cannot support, and no abstention behavior or confidence value is described.
Fabricated Citation Record
Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?
The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Corlytics or Clausematch. Corlytics' models classify, summarize and map regulation for compliance teams and regulators rather than draft court filings.
The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming CUBE, RegPlatform or Oden. CUBE's products turn regulatory change into obligations and mapped controls for compliance and risk teams at regulated businesses.
Bar Guidance Alignment
Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?
No public material engages with professional conduct or ethics guidance on AI. ABA Formal Opinion 512, Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority guidance, and regulator statements on AI use in a compliance function go unmentioned.
The company writes instead about AI rules that bind it as a developer, including the EU AI Act, the NIST framework and OECD principles, and certifies to ISO/IEC 42001. Its news section carries an enforcement report on fines against financial institutions in the second quarter of 2026 and a glossary of AI governance terms. Neither addresses the conduct duties of the people who use the platform.
The website legal notice says site content does not replace professional advice. That speaks to the website rather than to platform output, or to the duties of the compliance officer or lawyer who relies on it.
No CUBE material engages ABA Formal Opinion 512, Law Society or SRA guidance, or a regulator's statement on AI use inside a compliance or legal function. The website terms tell readers to take professional advice before acting on site content, and Intel's terms say the service is not professional advice.
Billing and Fee Posture
Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?
Clients are compliance, risk and audit teams inside regulated firms, and regulators, so platform use is not billed to a client by the hour. Health and life sciences clients use it for regulatory and submissions work, which also sits outside a legal fee relationship.
Advisers do use the content on client work. In one UK bank's rules mapping exercise, a third party consultancy carried out the mapping with rules supplied by Corlytics. Nothing published addresses how such a firm would disclose AI assisted regulatory analysis to its own client, and no per client record of AI assisted work is described.
Marketing makes efficiency claims, such as approvals 50% faster and compliance costs 30% lower with Policy Management, and an end to manual collection of regulatory updates.
CUBE sells to compliance and risk teams at banks, insurers and other regulated businesses, and to platform builders that embed its content. Its pitch is the buyer's own effort: one source of truth across the first and second lines, duplicate work removed, and automated triage in place of manual monitoring. No record of AI assisted work by matter is kept for fee purposes.
Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?
No subprocessor list, model provider list, data processing agreement or disclosure pack is public. The privacy notice names recipients only by category, and no model or provider is identified anywhere, so a client cannot state from public material which outside systems see its content.
Clients run their own supplier reviews instead. One reinsurer approved Corlytics as a third party supplier through its own digital governance process, after a requirements and design phase and a proof of concept. The security page invites contact for more on Corlytics' security and resilience procedures, without naming a document that would be shared.
ISO/IEC 27001, the SOC 2 Type 1 report from Thoropass and ISO/IEC 42001 from A-LIGN are named. None of the reports or certificates is posted, and no dates or report periods are given.
Annex A of the privacy exhibit lists the material subprocessors with their locations and transfer mechanisms. They are Datum and Vantage data centers in Great Britain, Microsoft Azure for cloud hosting by product, and CUBE group companies under an intragroup transfer agreement. A new subprocessor comes with five days for the customer to object, and updates go to a mailing list or trust center the customer subscribes to. No model provider is named and no client facing disclosure material is published.
Court Disclosure Support
If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?
The record the platform keeps is built for supervisors and auditors rather than courts. Change management, policy management and compliance monitoring each keep a full audit trail of actions, decisions and approvals. Obligations Management produces gap reports, dashboards and an attestation of how obligations map to policies and controls, and version history shows which text a mapping rested on.
Clients use that record with their regulators. A UK bank uses the platform's reports to show its primary conduct regulator how rules map to its policies and controls, and reports built with Corlytics helped it close out audit findings. In the FCA handbook project, every machine tagging change carried a review, approval or rejection with an audit trail.
The record does not mark which outputs came from a model, which source each summary drew on, or which expert validated it. It shows what the firm decided rather than the part the AI played.
RegPlatform keeps an audit trail from the first sign of a rule change through obligations, control mapping and reporting, built to give the board, auditors and regulators traceable evidence. The Priorities Coworker records its assessment decisions, the Analysis Coworker keeps each research record, and Regulatory Inventory logs the reasoning behind each mapping. No export for each document identifies the model used or the person who reviewed the output, and the record is built for supervisors rather than courts.
The questions both sides leave open
Derived from the records above rather than written, so it cannot favor either vendor. Take these into both conversations and ask each side the same question.
- Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
- Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
- Bar Guidance Alignment
Which one fits
Choose Corlytics if
- You want regulatory change carried into your own policies and controls. Corlytics maps obligations to policies, controls and products, returns suggested wording for gaps, and prompts users to revisit a mapping when a rule changes.
- Policy management belongs in the same platform. The Clausematch editor adds granular permissions, multistage approvals, version control, staff attestation and AI drafting of policy text.
- You work with a regulator that wants a digital rulebook. Corlytics sells a Taxonomy Manager edition for regulators, the product behind the FCA's Intelligent Handbook.
Choose CUBE if
- You want peer benchmarks on your controls. CUBE joins regulatory obligations to more than 300,000 controls contributed by financial institutions, and its RegControl tools rewrite controls, map them to obligations automatically and compare them with peers.
- Your team wants agents inside the workflow. CUBE's coworkers triage regulatory developments by certainty and applicability, answer questions across RegBook with sources, rewrite and generate controls, and track enforcement actions.
- You need the intelligence inside another system. RegConnect moves CUBE's regulatory data between RegPlatform and a firm's GRC or policy tools through a bidirectional API, and flags linked controls when a rule changes.
In summary
Corlytics
Corlytics is a regulatory intelligence platform for banks, insurers, asset managers, payments firms and regulators, based in Dublin. It collects rules, notices and enforcement actions worldwide and uses machine learning to classify, summarize and map them to a firm's obligations, policies and controls. According to the AI Legal Index, its AI runs under an ISO/IEC 42001 certified management system, and the FCA has run its handbook on Corlytics' taxonomy and tagging since 2017.
CUBE
CUBE is a regulatory intelligence company based in London, selling RegPlatform to enterprise compliance and risk teams and Intel to growing regulated firms. It captures regulatory change from more than 10,000 issuing bodies in 250 countries and territories and turns it into obligations mapped to controls. According to the AI Legal Index, CUBE's Global Terms carry an intellectual property indemnity and a cap that triples for confidentiality and indemnity claims, and its privacy exhibit lists its hosting subprocessors.
Questions buyers ask
Corlytics vs CUBE: what is the main difference?
Both turn global regulation into obligations for financial firms. Corlytics goes further into the firm's own control environment, with obligation mapping, gap suggestions, policy management, compliance monitoring and nonfinancial risk on one data model. CUBE leads with its data, joining obligations from more than 10,000 issuing bodies to a pool of bank controls for peer comparison, and works through agentic coworkers inside RegPlatform. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 13, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
How do the two describe the AI behind the platform?
CUBE describes proprietary AI trained only on regulatory content that classifies, extracts, maps and links publications in 100 languages, plus coworkers for triage, research, controls and enforcement, and names no model. Corlytics describes ensemble models with expert oversight, specialized mapping models and language models that suggest gap fixes, without naming a model or provider. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 13, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
How much regulation does each process?
CUBE says it processes 10 million data points a year across 750 jurisdictions, with 250 in house regulatory experts. Corlytics cites about 30 million pages of regulation a year, with its subject matter experts validating the enriched content. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 13, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
How does each handle security assurance?
Corlytics holds three certifications, ISO/IEC 27001 with a written scope, a SOC 2 Type 1 report from Thoropass and ISO/IEC 42001 from A-LIGN, none of them posted publicly. CUBE claims no certification. Its data security exhibit commits it to a written security program aligned with the ISO 27000 family, SOC 2 or CIS benchmarks, and breaches are reported within 72 hours. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 13, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
Does either say whether it trains models on customer content?
Neither says so in as many words. CUBE's Global Terms license it to use and store customer data only as far as needed to perform the agreement, and bar customers from training AI on CUBE content. Corlytics publishes no customer agreement or training policy. Both run AI over client material, through Corlytics' gap analysis and policy drafting and through CUBE's coworkers. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 13, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
Neither vendor paid for inclusion, placement or a grade, and neither reviewed this page before it published. Everything on it comes from public material on the dates shown. How the index grades.
Corlytics Limited is an Irish company wholly owned by Green Horizon BidCo Limited after Verdane's majority investment in 2024. CUBE Content Governance Global Limited is based in London and has had Hg as a strategic partner since 2024. It has since bought RegRoom, Acin, Kodex AI, 4CRisk.ai and the Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence and Oden businesses. CUBE publishes its customer agreements and Corlytics does not. Neither vendor reviewed this page.