T

Turbo Law

Turbo Law reads the whole matter file with AI to build its Fact Graph, and every module, from review and drafting to research, strategy and settlement and the assistant, generates work product from it: chronologies, contradiction detection, privilege flags, motions, discovery responses, case evaluations and settlement value models. No underlying case management system works without the models; Turbo Law says the firm's DMS remains the system of record.

Outputs are cited to a line in a source document or the public record, and case law search cites the relevant holdings. The research page says that if a case has been distinguished or overruled, the user will know before citing it, without describing how. Turbo Law says the system continuously checks its own work for missing facts, overlooked issues and inconsistencies, and that every workflow is measured against accuracy standards for its vertical before it ships. No standard, test set or result is published.

Case evaluations, settlement recommendations and motion drafts surface for attorney review before anything goes external, Turbo Law's security page says, and the operating model is stated as the platform proposes, the team verifies and partners decide; key conclusions link to source material for that check. The assistant page says nothing leaves the firm without attorney review, and that the assistant prepares work product but does not serve, file or send it.

The assistant runs tasks in several steps and on a schedule, such as monthly status reports on the first of the month, and its output returns to the team as cited work product. Partners review and approve carrier reports before they are sent, and users confirm the mass tort pre qualification result. No confidence threshold is published.

More than 2,000 active matters are reported on Turbo Law's home page, up from more than 1,800 in its funding announcement, and 100 percent of users are said to report improved quality of work and life. Firms using it are said to report 60 percent fewer nonbillable hours per matter, 10 percent fewer write offs and profitable alternative fee arrangements. The review page cites a 60 percent reduction in time to first position on medical malpractice intake and mass tort files of more than 2,000,000 pages, and the carriers page says reading 40 status reports becomes an hour's work instead of a day's. No customer is named and no method is given for any figure.

The privacy policy says Turbo Law does not assert or waive privilege or work product on the customer's behalf, acts as service provider or processor handling customer content only to provide the services and as the customer agreement permits, limits staff access to authorized personnel for legitimate purposes such as support and security, and bars training on customer content. Tenant isolation means its own team cannot reach customer data without a ticket and client approval, and according to the home page, data access is governed by permissions, ethical walls and privilege aware controls. Neither the customer agreement nor a DPA is published.

The Terms of Use say Turbo Law provides software, not legal services, that nothing creates an attorney client relationship, and that licensed attorneys exercising independent professional judgment should make legal decisions. On the security page, the platform is described as built to make litigators faster, not to practice law. No audience or jurisdictional limits are stated for the platform.

Turbo Law's security page says every drafting and analysis workflow is measured against accuracy standards for its vertical before it ships, and does not ship if it fails; the about page repeats the gate. Its Trust Center lists board oversight briefings, annual risk assessments, quarterly critical system reviews and a board of directors charter. The standards, results and any assessment of uneven performance are not published, and no owner for model behavior is named.

Staff access requires a support ticket and client approval, according to Turbo Law's security page, which also describes encryption at rest and in transit, enforced two factor authentication, exportable logs of every access, query and export kept for one year by default, and HIPAA business associate agreements. The help center adds AES 256 encryption at rest, role based permissions and time stamped logs. Its Trust Center names subprocessors, among them Intercom, Userback.io, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform for hosting, and GitHub, with two more not shown, and lists a customer data deletion record and customer facing logs among its documents.

Deletion and retention of customer content are governed by a customer agreement that is not published, though the home page FAQ says data is retained for one year unless otherwise agreed. The privacy page carries two different policy texts, one covering the platform and one covering only the website.

No published position says what the vendor stands behind. The only published terms govern the website: they cap liability for the site at $100, provide it as is, have the user indemnify Turbo Law for misuse of the site, and choose Georgia law with venue in Fulton County. They say the platform is governed by separate order forms, subscription terms, a data processing agreement and, where applicable, a business associate agreement, none of which is published. Nothing published addresses warranties, indemnities, caps or remedies for the platform or its AI output.

Integration is claimed without named systems. The law firms page says Turbo Law connects to the DMS and case management systems a firm already runs and builds a single Fact Graph per matter, the home page FAQ says the firm's DMS remains the system of record, and the help center says that with a case management integration, case information and documents are imported automatically, a one way flow. Press material says the platform plugs into existing case files, and carrier integrations are listed for firm wide rollout.

No document management, case management, electronic billing or carrier system is named. PACER and docket monitoring, and batch operations across matters, are listed as coming soon. Most firms are said to go live in four to six weeks depending on integrations, after a pilot of two to eight weeks with a forward deployed engineer.

According to Turbo Law's security page, the application and data are hosted in dedicated Microsoft Azure environments and every client environment is logically isolated, which states the tenancy model. The Trust Center also lists Google Cloud Platform for cloud hosting and infrastructure. No region, residency option or processing location for AI calls is published; the privacy policy says information may be transferred to and stored in other countries, including the United States, under EU Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK Addendum or IDTA.

The Trust Center at trust.turbolaw.ai lists SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA as compliant, sets out control families, includes a SOC 2 system description and offers more than 150 documents on request, and the security page says SOC 2 documentation is available under NDA. Prescient Security appears under Trusted by, with no role stated, and no auditor is named. Controls are described as aligned to the Trust Services Criteria and continuously monitored; no audit period, report date or auditor opinion is published. Single sign on through SAML 2.0 is listed as coming soon.

The model architecture is described, and no provider is named. Per the security page, each workflow goes to the model best suited to it, and models change as the state of the art moves, with no dependence on a single vendor, on dedicated Azure infrastructure. The about page says the model layer changes underneath while the workflow stays, and that the chief technology officer leads the model routing layer. No model or provider is named, the Trust Center's subprocessor list names no model provider, and no notice of model changes is committed.

Nothing about pricing is published. The site has no pricing page and routes every buyer to a demo request; no unit, structure or figure is stated. The law firms page says the product is priced for the work, not the token, and that pricing is predictable, without a figure, tier or unit, and the carriers page promises results without adding cost.

Turbo Law sells to defense firms and insurance carriers. Its FAQ lists tort and insurance matters across ten types, mergers and acquisitions, business litigation, construction, real estate and employment law, and says it continues expanding into new practice areas; the about page says it builds one vertical at a time. A mass tort intake product serves mass tort teams with short form complaints, plaintiff fact sheets, qualification sorting and a settlement maximization engine. Drafting follows the jurisdiction's local rules. Where the models are weaker is not stated.