eBrevia vs LinkSquares: how they compare in 2026

E
eBrevia profile
L
LinkSquares profile
Last verifiedOctober 16, 2026

eBrevia and LinkSquares both convert agreements into structured information that legal teams can review and use. eBrevia's Contract Analyzer emphasizes large review sets, source linked extraction, reviewer assignments, and exported findings for diligence and related projects. Lens adds questions without requiring a new extraction model, while DraftPro reuses clauses and prepares Word redlines. LinkSquares combines contract intelligence with a wider corporate legal workflow and an AI Legal Assistant for drafting, analysis, and research. Its standard extracted values support reports and ongoing visibility over signed agreements. eBrevia is a relevant fit where project review, reusable contract data, and movement into other legal systems are central. LinkSquares has a different emphasis where the internal legal team wants contract intelligence and assistance for the work surrounding its agreements in a shared operating environment.

At a glance

Category
eBreviaContract Review & Drafting
LinkSquaresContract Review & Drafting
Founded
eBrevia2011
LinkSquares2015
Headquarters
eBreviaCoral Gables, Florida, United States
LinkSquaresBoston, Massachusetts, United States
Last verified
eBreviaOct 16, 2026
LinkSquaresOct 10, 2026

All 15 axes, side by side

The same grid applied to every vendor in the index, graded from public sources. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

eBrevia
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

AI drives eBrevia's extraction, contract questions, and suggested revisions. Contract Analyzer applies more than 700 prepared fields and supports optional custom extraction, while Lens answers questions without requiring a new model for each request. DraftPro applies playbooks and draws clauses from previous agreements to assist Word editing. Those capabilities sit alongside a conventional operating layer in Command: a repository, contract requests, assignees, priorities, due dates, and status changes. Removing AI would remove the intelligence and drafting functions, but the surrounding storage and contract work system would still have functions. The suite therefore combines an AI engine with ongoing agreement administration.

LinkSquares
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

LinkSquares rebuilt its platform in 2026 around agents, launched in May and generally available in June, so AI now drafts, redlines, researches and writes stakeholder updates inside the contract workflow. LinkAI, the engine behind it, extracts more than 120 data points from every agreement in Analyze, from renewal and termination dates to governing law, payment terms and liability caps. It also sorts each upload into one of 26 Smart Types. Those values feed reports, dashboards, event reminders and the Salesforce sync. The AI Legal Assistant redlines against playbooks, drafts amendments and answers legal questions, and a risk agent rates language against weighted criteria the customer defines. Smart OCR turns scans into text that can be read and filtered. The repository, approval routing, clause libraries, templates, signature and reporting still run as conventional software, and Smart Values are switched on or off during implementation.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

eBrevia
BB on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureGrounding is real and documented, with linked primary sources and a described retrieval method, short of published accuracy figures an outsider can test.

Contract Analyzer presents extracted information beside the agreement and lets a reviewer jump from a result to the exact source text. Lens uses the same contract material for contextual answers, and DraftPro draws reusable clauses from agreements already in the repository. Users can validate, annotate, or correct results before exporting them. This gives contract findings a traceable basis, rather than treating generated language as an unsupported conclusion. Published review speed and accuracy claims are not accompanied by a reproducible evaluation dataset or a detailed failure analysis. The source links concern agreements, not a verified collection of judicial authority.

LinkSquares
CC on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureAccuracy is asserted without measurement, or grounding is claimed while output cites sources the reader cannot open and verify.

LinkSquares claims 95 percent or better field level accuracy out of the box for its extraction and 99 percent accuracy for Smart OCR. Neither figure comes with a test set, a method or a breakdown by field or contract type. Each Smart Value carries a status in the product. A green light bulb marks a value the AI extracted with high confidence, and Not Present means the term is absent. Inconclusive marks a value the AI was not confident enough to extract, which the help center says needs further investigation. Values a manager edits by hand show a pencil icon. The AI Legal Assistant answers legal research questions from more than 100 public and government sources and cites where each answer came from. LinkSquares markets that research as free of the hallucination risk of generic AI tools. The sources themselves are not listed. The SaaS Terms of Service disclaim any warranty of accuracy.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

eBrevia
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside a supervising lawyer, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.

DraftPro proposes redlines after applying the legal team's playbook, but the lawyer chooses which revisions enter the Word file. The review explains whether a provision passes or fails the chosen standard and allows navigation to the relevant clause. Contract Analyzer separately supports reviewer assignments, progress states, annotations, and quality assurance workflows. Command tracks ownership and activity as an agreement moves through drafting, review, negotiation, and signature. These are practical review surfaces and responsibilities. The product does not describe a confidence based stopping rule, an automatic route for every uncertain answer, or a recovery procedure after an incorrect result has been accepted.

LinkSquares
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside a supervising lawyer, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.

The AI Legal Assistant applies playbook redlines in Suggesting mode, as tracked changes with a comment explaining each deviation. The user accepts or rejects them one by one or all at once, then saves a new version stamped with its date and time. LinkSquares must switch the Assistant on for an account, and an administrator grants access user by user. The May 2026 launch describes agents that act on contracts while legal teams keep review and decision making. The Workflow Builder Agent, introduced in September 2026, leaves the legal team in control of what goes live. Autonomous agents, first offered through a beta waitlist, identify upcoming auto renewals and expirations, summarize newly ingested contracts and review the repository for clauses that deviate from the organization's standards. The risk agent applies criteria the legal team names, defines and weights. LinkSquares sets no point at which an agent stops and hands work back to a lawyer, and does not say what happens after a wrong redline is accepted.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

eBrevia
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Named users describe concrete work with eBrevia. McDermott, Will & Emery attributes its ability to meet difficult review deadlines to the product. MUFG describes using custom trainable AI across different review needs, while Morris, Manning & Martin connects it with reducing data handling so lawyers can focus on analysis. Baker McKenzie discusses international deals, and Best World Group describes visibility across regional contracts. The product also advertises review time reductions of 30 to 90 percent. These accounts establish deployed legal and business uses, but the cited figures are not tied to a dated study with a reproducible measurement method.

LinkSquares
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed firms or legal departments, dated, with figures for what changed and a method a reader can assess.

LinkSquares names customers with dated figures. Accession Risk Management Group, in a March 2026 case study, cut contracting time from more than 1,300 hours to 43 and legal queue times from about 197 hours to 55.5. Its legal leader, Katie Nagel, describes a $1.4 million return calculated on the executive dashboard against the team's blended rate. Softonic (September 2024) cut outside counsel spend by 40 percent, with sales reps executing NDAs themselves in a fifth of the time. OutSystems (May 2024) reports contract completion time down by more than 30 percent, and Commvault (January 2023) sales contract time to close down by 50 percent. A Forrester Total Economic Impact study, commissioned by LinkSquares and dated October 2025, built a composite organization from five decision makers. It found a 360 percent return over three years, a $2.1 million net present value and payback in under six months. LinkSquares counts more than 1,200 customers, naming DraftKings, TIME and ProPharma.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

eBrevia
BB on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureSubstantive published commitments on confidentiality and training use, short of the full picture: commonly silence on segregation between users or matters, or on what the underlying model provider may retain.

The service agreement treats uploaded Licensee Data as confidential and restricts disclosure to authorized recipients who need the information and carry matching confidentiality duties. It permits injunctive relief for a breach and requires steps to recover improperly disclosed material. Live customer data is deleted at termination or written request, with encrypted backups and legal retention exceptions. Public marketing promises no training on client data, while the incorporated Privacy Notice permits service personal data to support product improvement. The contract does not expressly exclude model training from that permission. Attorney client privilege, matter barriers, and downstream model provider retention receive no specific public treatment.

LinkSquares
CC on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureConfidentiality is asserted in general terms, or the commitment lives only in a sales conversation and cannot be read in advance.

Section 5.2 of LinkSquares' SaaS Terms of Service gives LinkSquares an irrevocable right to use client data, during the term and after it, in aggregated and anonymized form. The permitted uses are research, benchmarking and improving and training its AI algorithms and machine learning models. Confidential information and anything that could identify the client are excluded. Custom Smart Values are built by LinkSquares' data science team using the customer's own agreements. LinkSquares' AI pages say contract data is never shared with or used to train third party language model providers, and that none of it is retained by them. The terms make client data the client's property and return or destroy it on request within 90 days after termination. Customers can manage their own encryption keys in AWS and cut off LinkSquares' access at any time. The AI Legal Assistant page says attorney client confidentiality is protected at every stage, and the terms carry no clause on privilege or work product.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

eBrevia
BB on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA real position is published on advice versus tooling, short of full treatment: commonly a disclaimer without the supervision and competence dimension, or silence on jurisdiction limits.

eBrevia's service agreement defines its role as a tool for reviewing, summarizing, and managing legal material, expressly excluding replacement of legal advice. The customer remains responsible for decisions based on generated information. Authorized users include employees, attorneys, paralegals, and professional staff performing legal or related services. A licensee may share analysis with its clients, but direct client access requires a separate license. DraftPro reinforces lawyer control over proposed changes. These boundaries identify the product's professional role without setting out jurisdiction specific eligibility rules or a detailed account of how a firm should satisfy competence, supervision, and client consent duties.

LinkSquares
DD on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureNothing published on the advice line for a product that produces legal work, including where it is sold to people who are not lawyers.

LinkSquares sells to in house legal teams and to the sales, procurement, finance and HR staff who request and sign contracts through it. Its AI Legal Assistant now answers legal research questions, drafts amendments and redlines contracts. The only statement on legal advice in LinkSquares' terms covers onboarding, where the Onboarding Services Terms say those services do not constitute legal advice or counsel. The SaaS Terms of Service and the AI pages carry no equivalent statement for AI output. Nothing ties the Assistant's research answers to a lawyer's review, and its page markets the research feature to compliance teams checking contract language against current regulations. LinkSquares sets no jurisdiction limits for research, and its help center lists English as the platform's only language.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

eBrevia
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNo governance position published for a system whose output affects legal outcomes.

eBrevia offers Legal Advisory services covering AI use case selection, secure architecture, governance mapping, pilot evaluation, and adoption. Those services describe work for a customer's rollout, rather than a published policy governing eBrevia's own model development. Its leadership materials identify technical responsibility for the AI platforms, and its security program concerns protection of information. No public framework describes model release approval, bias evaluation, or results across languages and agreement types. Customer playbooks specify review positions, but they do not reveal how the vendor evaluates errors or uneven performance before introducing changes to its underlying AI.

LinkSquares
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNo governance position published for a system whose output affects legal outcomes.

LinkSquares describes LinkAI as carefully designed with governance in mind and keeps AI features off until LinkSquares enables them and an administrator grants access. It sets out no AI policy, responsible AI principles, named owner for model behavior, release testing, model cards or bias testing, and holds no ISO/IEC 42001 certification. Risk criteria for the risk agent are written and weighted by the customer, so the standard that agent applies is set by the legal team. Section 5.2 of the SaaS Terms of Service lets LinkSquares train its models on anonymized, aggregated client data without describing how that training is reviewed. The annual SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 audits cover information security rather than model behavior. Nothing describes how extraction or redline quality varies across contract types, drafting styles or the languages the help center says the platform does not support.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

eBrevia
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipSubstantive published policy covering most of the ground, short of the full set: commonly no named subprocessor list or no stated incident practice.

The customer agreement provides deletion of live Licensee Data at termination or on written request, while allowing encrypted backup copies for six months and retention required by law. The Privacy Notice supplies a similar rule for service personal data. Contract Analyzer describes encryption in transit and storage, and the wider platform offers access controls for enterprise use. Public materials also describe monitoring and independent security audits. They do not name a complete current subprocessor chain or establish a specific incident notification deadline. The service terms exclude protected health information, payment card data, and certain financial personal information from authorized uploads.

LinkSquares
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipSubstantive published policy covering most of the ground, short of the full set: commonly no named subprocessor list or no stated incident practice.

LinkSquares' Data Processing Addendum covers GDPR, UK GDPR, the CCPA and PIPEDA, with the 2021 standard contractual clauses for transfers. It points to a subprocessor list in the help center that requires a login. A new subprocessor comes with at least 10 calendar days' notice before it processes EU personal data, and 5 days to object. The Security Addendum commits LinkSquares to notify the client without undue delay of unauthorized use of client data, with no period in hours. It also keeps records of staff access to client data for at least 90 days. Data is encrypted with TLS 1.2 in transit and AES 256 at rest, and customers can hold their own keys through AWS Key Management Service. The terms return or destroy client data on request within 90 days after termination, while one archival copy may be kept. The audit log keeps 365 days of activity by default, longer on request. No retention period is set for AI output during the term.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

eBrevia
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA real published position on liability, short of the full picture: commonly a stated indemnity without scope or caps.

The service agreement provides an intellectual property indemnity for claims that eBrevia's technology infringes third party rights, subject to a customer modification exclusion. That indemnity is expressly outside the general liability limit. Ordinary direct damages are capped at fees paid during the preceding 12 months, with consequential losses excluded and a one year limit for bringing an action. Separate exceptions cover specified personal injury, misconduct, and fraud claims. The functionality commitment uses commercially reasonable efforts, while accuracy and completeness are disclaimed. These terms provide defined recourse for technology infringement, but no specific indemnity or correctness warranty for generated legal output.

LinkSquares
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA real published position on liability, short of the full picture: commonly a stated indemnity without scope or caps.

LinkSquares' SaaS Terms of Service, governed by Massachusetts law, cap each party's total liability at the fees paid or payable in the year the claim arose. They exclude indirect, consequential and punitive damages, except for gross negligence or willful misconduct, and cap liability for early access and evaluation products at the greater of those fees or $100. LinkSquares defends the client against third party intellectual property claims about the services, excluding claims arising from client data, combinations and misuse, and the client indemnifies LinkSquares against claims arising from client data. The warranty covers only the functions described in the order form, with correction as the sole remedy, and everything else, accuracy included, is disclaimed as is. The Standard SLA targets 99.5 percent monthly availability, with credits of 1 to 5 percent of the annual price. No term addresses AI output, and no insurance is stated.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

eBrevia
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

DraftPro works inside Word and obtains clause language from the licensed eBrevia repository; users inspect suggestions and apply selected redlines to the draft. Connect handles incoming agreements and pushes extracted data into downstream systems. Its listed connections include iManage, NetDocuments, HighQ, Relativity, Salesforce, SharePoint, Microsoft applications, and reporting tools. Described operations include tagging files, assigning employees, validating data across systems, and generating reports. This establishes movement into and out of the contract platform. The public descriptions do not provide connector specific field mappings, permission synchronization rules, or installation procedures showing what each firm must configure.

LinkSquares
AA on Practice Systems Integration DepthDocumented, verifiable integrations into the systems legal work already lives in, with the depth described: what syncs, in which direction, and what a firm must configure.

LinkSquares documents its integrations in a public help center. The REST API, with keys an administrator issues, pulls Smart Values, terms, types, tags and parent child hierarchies from Analyze in bulk or by agreement. A date filter supports incremental syncs, results include only agreements the API user may view, and calls are limited to 15 a second, with an OpenAPI 3.0 specification available in the app. The Salesforce package pushes default and custom Smart Values into Salesforce records, with the liability cap fields excluded. Box, SharePoint, Dropbox, Google Drive, Egnyte and Amazon S3 connect as inbound syncs that ingest any contract added to a chosen folder, set up with LinkSquares' implementation team. A connector for Claude lets Team and Enterprise users create agreements, manage legal requests and look across the repository under their own LinkSquares permissions, once a Claude administrator enables it. Slack, a Word add in, DocuSign and Adobe Sign complete the set, and no iManage or NetDocuments connector exists.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

eBrevia
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment model is stated clearly with partial residency detail, or residency is offered without the processing location being addressed, or the tenancy model is stated on its own with no residency detail published.

eBrevia operates as a hosted contract platform with a Word add in connected to the licensed environment. Its Privacy Notice says hosting defaults to the United States unless the customer instructs otherwise, while also identifying facilities across several continents. The same notice explains that business processes cross borders and processing cannot always be confined to the individual's country. No public tier matrix identifies the alternative regions available for every product, and no separate location is supplied for each generative model task. A hosting instruction therefore provides some regional control without a complete account of storage, processing, and provider locations.

LinkSquares
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment model is stated clearly with partial residency detail, or residency is offered without the processing location being addressed, or the tenancy model is stated on its own with no residency detail published.

LinkSquares runs as software as a service on AWS, with multi tenant and single tenant options hosted in the United States. Customers can create their own AWS KMS key in the same region as their data and can revoke and restore LinkSquares' access at any time, knowing that a deleted key leaves the data unrecoverable. The privacy policy says data is transferred to and processed in the United States, and the Data Processing Addendum relies on standard contractual clauses for EU and UK data. No EU hosting region or on premises deployment is offered. LinkSquares does not say where its outside language models process content, and the Claude connector runs through Anthropic under Anthropic's own terms. Status for the agentic platform, Analyze, Finalize, Prioritize, the Word add in and the Salesforce integration is tracked on a public status page.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

eBrevia
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

eBrevia states that it is independently certified for SOC 1 and SOC 2, and Contract Analyzer specifically names SOC 2 Type II infrastructure. The security description refers to continuing audits and monitoring, encryption, and controls for authorized access. It also claims GDPR and HIPAA compliance, which are separate from a disclosed audit report. No accessible report supplies the audit period, exceptions, or precise service scope. The public customer agreement additionally restricts protected health information, so the HIPAA marketing statement does not override that upload restriction or establish that a customer has an applicable business associate agreement.

LinkSquares
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

LinkSquares' security page lists a SOC 2 Type 2 report, ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance, and its post quantum cryptography statement says both certifications are audited annually. The SaaS Terms of Service commit LinkSquares to independent SOC 2 Type II audits and penetration testing every year. No auditor, certification body or report period is named. Customers reach the security materials through a request form linked from the help center, and the Data Processing Addendum makes the SOC 2 Type II report available on written request. There is no self serve trust portal. Controls listed include AWS Security Hub, a web application firewall, DDoS protection, daily vulnerability scans, monitoring and incident response around the clock, customer managed encryption keys and audit logs.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

eBrevia
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe vendor refers to advanced or proprietary models without identifying what sits underneath.

The suite distinguishes structured extraction from Lens, its generative layer for questions across contract material. Contract Analyzer has prepared fields and optional custom models, while DraftPro combines AI classification, playbook review, and clause reuse. eBrevia describes its own long development history in machine learning and natural language processing, but does not identify the foundation model providers serving current Lens or DraftPro requests. No version inventory, provider retention arrangement, or notification commitment for model changes is published in the product and contract materials. Named business integrations identify connected applications, not the model services that may process a customer's agreement.

LinkSquares
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe supply chain is partly disclosed: providers named without change notification, or architecture described without the providers.

LinkAI combines LinkSquares' own models with outside large language models. The LinkAI page says LinkSquares pulls language models into its system alongside its in house models so that no customer data is shared with or retained by the providers. The February 2025 introduction of LinkAI described hundreds of proprietary models. LinkSquares says its extraction models are trained on more than 10 million real contracts with 6 million human annotations, and Custom Smart Values are trained on a customer's own agreements. It names none of the outside model providers or model versions, and the subprocessor list sits behind a login. LinkSquares notes that a customer's zero data retention agreement with Anthropic does not extend to traffic through its Claude connector. The DPA gives 10 days' notice of new subprocessors, with no separate notice of model changes.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

eBrevia
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

eBrevia quotes review projects according to contract volume, review scope, and required capabilities. Its service agreement sets fees and access in a proposal and defines a processed Document as no more than 300 pages. The default contract period is one year with annual renewal unless the proposal changes it, and nonrenewal requires 30 days' notice. Contract Analyzer, DraftPro, and Connect can form part of the licensed services. No numeric subscription rate or implementation charge is supplied publicly. Training and support appear within the service definition, but their inclusion and any additional cost depend on the negotiated proposal.

LinkSquares
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

Subscription quotes depend on contract volume, user count, selected modules, implementation and onboarding support, and custom integrations or advanced features. That establishes the units and scope used to price a deployment, without a numeric starting rate. Implementation and onboarding costs are included in the upfront discussion, and the product can expand with the customer's team. The platform combines contract intelligence, drafting, review, workflows, and business reporting, so the selected capabilities affect the package. A published per-user amount, fixed implementation fee, and standard price for each module are not available. The total therefore depends on the agreed configuration and contract volume.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

eBrevia
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

The product addresses law firms, corporate legal departments, financial institutions, and audit or consulting teams. Law firm workflows include mergers and acquisitions diligence, bankruptcy and financing review, and compliance reporting. Contract Analyzer also supports leases, repapering, and migration of agreement data. DraftPro covers repeat commercial, employment, privacy, technology, finance, real estate, and corporate agreements, with sample playbooks for selected types and custom positions for others. Command extends contract information to procurement, sales, finance, and related business teams. Coverage is described through these tasks and examples, without a complete list of supported jurisdictions or performance boundaries for each language.

LinkSquares
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

LinkSquares is built for in house legal teams and the business teams around them, with pages for legal, procurement and sales. Its use cases run from contract review and vendor management to M&A and data privacy compliance. Power users with full access are usually legal staff, while Standard users in collaborating departments get read access. Smart Types sort uploads into 26 agreement types, and LinkSquares says it supports every contract type from NDAs and MSAs to M&A agreements, including documents over 500 pages. The help center says the platform runs in English only, while the Smart OCR page claims it detects different languages. Named customers span media, gaming, software, insurance and life sciences, from TIME and DraftKings to Commvault, OutSystems, Accession and ProPharma. Law firm use is not covered, and the research feature names no jurisdictions.

The 12 legal signals, side by side

Recorded rather than graded. These are the questions a practitioner has to answer before a tool touches a client matter, and the answers are taken from public material only.

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

eBrevia
Permitted, in the contract

The service agreement incorporates the Privacy Notice for uploaded material and service personal data. That notice permits personal information to support developing and improving products and services, without expressly excluding model training from that permission. The scope is personal data covered by the notice, not an assertion that every uploaded agreement is used for training. Public event material separately promises no training on client data, but a matching prohibition does not appear in the customer contract.

LinkSquares
Permitted, in the contract

Section 5.2 of LinkSquares' SaaS Terms of Service gives LinkSquares an irrevocable right, during the term and after it, to use client data in aggregated and anonymized form. The permitted uses include improving its products and training its AI algorithms and machine learning models. Confidential information and anything that could identify the client are carved out, and no opt out is offered. Building Custom Smart Values also involves the data science team working with agreements supplied by that customer.

LinkSquares' AI pages say contract data and legal work product are never shared with or used to train third party language model providers, and that none of it is retained by them.

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

eBrevia
Customer controlled, no zero option

The customer can instruct eBrevia in writing to delete live Licensee Data, and termination also triggers that deletion duty. The Privacy Notice similarly permits removal of personal data from live services on request. Encrypted backups may remain for six months, and legal retention requirements create an exception. This is control through a contractual instruction, rather than a published retention slider. No mode promises that prompts and generated answers are never retained during processing.

LinkSquares
Disclosed without a period

LinkSquares says it pulls language models into its own system so that no customer data is shared with or retained by the model providers. Inside the platform, no retention period applies to AI summaries, redlines, research answers or drafts during the term, and AI Legal Assistant drafts stay under Recent Drafts until a user removes them. After termination, section 8.3 of the SaaS Terms of Service returns or destroys client data on request within 90 days, while LinkSquares may keep one archival copy and need not purge backups.

The audit log keeps 365 days of activity by default. For the Claude connector, a customer's zero data retention agreement with Anthropic does not cover connector traffic.

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

eBrevia
Not addressed

DraftPro ties user access to the licensed eBrevia environment and can filter clause material by project, matter, contract type, or jurisdiction. Contract Analyzer supports assignments and enterprise access controls. Those features do not establish that retrieval enforces a firm's ethical walls or inherits the permissions of an upstream document repository. A matter filter organizes material for review; it is not, by itself, a documented security boundary preventing access to another client's information.

LinkSquares
Own model, documented

LinkSquares keeps its own permission model, documented in its help center. Analyze has Power, Standard and IT Admin user types with Administrator, Manager and Standard permission levels, and administrators can create unlimited custom roles that allow or restrict access by agreement type and tag. Finalize has five license types with their own permissions. The API returns only agreements the API user may view, and the Claude connector inherits each user's LinkSquares permissions.

Legal, sales, procurement and finance users share one instance, and LinkSquares describes no ethical wall, matter level barrier or inheritance of permissions from a document management system.

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

eBrevia
Disclosure addressed, notice absent

The Privacy Notice allows disclosure in response to an information request when eBrevia determines that law, regulation, or legal process permits or requires it. It also covers disclosures to protect rights and defend legal claims. Neither that provision nor the service agreement commits to informing the customer before producing material, and no transparency report is supplied. The confidentiality clause limits ordinary sharing but does not add a separate notice procedure for compulsory demands.

LinkSquares
Notice committed

LinkSquares' SaaS Terms of Service let either party disclose confidential information when law, rule or order requires it. Where reasonably practicable and legally permissible, the disclosing party must give prior written notice so the other can seek a protective order, and must disclose no more than necessary. The privacy policy, last updated February 2026, allows disclosure in response to a subpoena, a warrant or a court or regulatory order.

The Data Processing Addendum's standard contractual clauses govern public authority requests for EU personal data. LinkSquares issues no transparency report.

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

eBrevia
Not addressed

eBrevia's contract answers and clause library derive from agreements supplied to its repository. Lens asks questions of that material, while DraftPro reuses provisions from earlier contracts with filters for the current context. The service terms require the customer to hold the rights needed for uploaded material. No separate primary law collection, publisher license, or legal update schedule is described. Contract source traceability therefore establishes where an agreement answer came from, rather than the provenance of external legal authority.

LinkSquares
Not addressed

LinkSquares describes its extraction models as trained on more than 10 million real contracts with 6 million human annotations, rather than on templates. It does not say where the contracts came from or on what rights basis they are used. Section 5.2 of its terms adds anonymized, aggregated client data to the training material, and Custom Smart Values train on a customer's own agreements. The AI Legal Assistant answers research questions from more than 100 public and government sources and cites each answer, without listing the sources or saying how often they are refreshed.

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

eBrevia
Not addressed

A reviewer can follow an extracted provision back to the contract and assess it against a playbook. Neither that process nor a Lens answer checks whether a judicial authority has later been reversed or limited. The products focus on contract language, obligations, and company positions, with no named citator or subsequent treatment mechanism. A governing law field identifies a contract term; it does not establish that the law applied to the agreement remains current.

LinkSquares
Not addressed

The AI Legal Assistant answers legal research questions with citations to public and government sources, and LinkSquares markets it for checking contract language against current regulations. LinkSquares names no citator and describes no check of whether a cited statute, regulation or case is still good law. The rest of the platform extracts and compares contract terms rather than citing authority, and playbook rules come from the customer's own templates and drafting rules.

The Assistant can generate playbook rules from an existing template, and nothing marks a clause or rule for review after the law behind it changes.

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

eBrevia
Not addressed

Lens is described as producing contextual answers linked to contract material, but no public example specifies what it returns when the agreement cannot support an answer. DraftPro's pass or fail result concerns compliance with a chosen playbook, not uncertainty in the model's interpretation. Users can correct extraction, add missing clauses, and reject revisions. Those review controls leave room for human judgment without defining an automatic refusal or abstention path for unsupported output.

LinkSquares
Documented

Each Smart Value in Analyze carries a status. Inconclusive, shown as a blue light bulb, marks a value the AI was not confident enough to extract and that needs further investigation. Not Present records a term the AI judged absent from the agreement. Values a manager or administrator corrects show a pencil icon, and Smart Types mark an agreement Uncategorized when its type cannot be determined. The AI Legal Assistant has no described abstention path for research questions, and LinkSquares gives no confidence measure for redlines or drafts.

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

eBrevia
None located

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin has no entry naming eBrevia or e Brevia. The database records court decisions involving hallucinated AI material and identifies tools when the proceedings do so. eBrevia mainly analyzes agreements and proposes contract language, rather than preparing briefs from judicial authorities. That focus does not make its output infallible, and the absence of a named court case is not a test of extraction accuracy or drafting quality.

LinkSquares
None located

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming LinkSquares or LinkAI. The AI Legal Assistant answers legal research questions with citations to public and government sources, while the rest of LinkSquares works on contracts rather than court filings.

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

eBrevia
Not addressed

The service agreement separates software assistance from legal advice and places responsibility for decisions with the customer. DraftPro also keeps proposed changes subject to lawyer approval. These provisions establish a supervised product role, but no named bar opinion or jurisdiction specific ethics mapping accompanies them. The public materials do not connect use of Lens, shared client material, or automated contract revisions with particular duties of competence, confidentiality, disclosure, or supervision under a professional rule.

LinkSquares
Not addressed

LinkSquares names no bar opinion, ethics rule or professional conduct guidance, although its AI Legal Assistant answers legal research questions and its pages address general counsel, legal operations and compliance teams. The only statement on legal advice in its terms appears in the Onboarding Services Terms, which say onboarding services do not constitute legal advice or counsel. The AI Legal Assistant page says attorney client confidentiality is protected at every stage, without tying that to a professional rule.

Its research feature is offered to compliance teams and to legal operations staff as well as lawyers, with no guidance on supervising answers before they are relied on.

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

eBrevia
Savings claims only

eBrevia markets reduced review time and cost to law firms as well as corporate buyers. Its law firm use cases include diligence, financing review, and compliance reports, and the customer license expressly permits sharing resulting analysis with clients. These uses place the product inside legal service delivery where efficiency can affect a bill. The public product and contract materials do not explain how lawyers should record saved time, adjust billed hours, or disclose an AI related charge.

LinkSquares
Outside the fee relationship

LinkSquares is bought by in house legal teams to run their company's own contracts, so AI assisted work does not reach a client bill. Its savings claims address the buyer's own costs. Softonic cut outside counsel spend by 40 percent, Accession calculated a $1.4 million return against its legal team's blended rate, and the commissioned Forrester study found a 360 percent return over three years. The executive dashboard in Finalize lets a legal team value its own time this way.

Comparison pages and case studies speak to general counsel and legal operations leaders rather than to firms billing clients, and law firm use is not covered.

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

eBrevia
Not addressed

The service agreement, Privacy Notice, and security statements provide general information about confidentiality, retention, and permitted data. They do not include a current named model provider chain, a complete subprocessor register, or a client disclosure package for outside counsel use. Lists of supported applications describe integrations rather than organizations processing data on eBrevia's behalf. A firm can use the public contract material in diligence, but it does not resolve a client's AI specific notification requirements.

LinkSquares
On request only

LinkSquares' Data Processing Addendum, Security Addendum, Standard SLA and SaaS Terms of Service can all be read without an agreement. The subprocessor list the DPA points to sits in a help center article that requires a login. SOC 2 and security reports come through a request form, and the DPA also makes the SOC 2 Type II report available on written request. The outside language models behind LinkAI are not named, so a legal department cannot hand its own stakeholders a model provider list from LinkSquares' open material. New subprocessors come with at least 10 days' notice and 5 days to object.

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

eBrevia
Partial record

Contract Analyzer retains extracted terms beside source language and supports review status, annotations, and exported reports. DraftPro leaves selected revisions visible as Word redlines, while Command records contract activity and status changes. Those elements can help reconstruct what was reviewed. No public export combines the generating model, the full set of material used for an answer, and a named person's verification in one certificate. Contract analysis records therefore cover only part of a filing disclosure.

LinkSquares
Partial record

LinkSquares records activity in an audit log that administrators filter by event, date and user and download as a spreadsheet, kept 365 days by default and longer on request. AI Legal Assistant redlines arrive as tracked changes with a comment explaining each deviation, and accepted changes save as a new version with its date and time. Smart Values show whether the AI extracted a value or a person entered it. Nothing records which model produced an output, and LinkSquares offers no disclosure template, since its output is contracts and reports rather than court filings.

What neither one publishes

The questions both sides leave open

Derived from the records above rather than written, so it cannot favor either vendor. Take these into both conversations and ask each side the same question.

Axes where neither earns credit
  • AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Signals neither addresses in public material
  • Primary Law Corpus Provenance
  • Good Law Verification
  • Bar Guidance Alignment

Which one fits

Choose eBrevia if

  • A diligence team needs assigned review work and structured findings across a large agreement set.
  • New contract questions should be answered without preparing a separate extraction model.
  • Contract results need to move into other repositories, reporting tools, or legal applications.

Choose LinkSquares if

  • Corporate legal wants agreement intelligence alongside assistance with amendments and business communications.
  • Standard extracted contract values should feed recurring internal reports.
  • The purchase concerns an ongoing legal operating environment around contracts and requests.

In summary

eBrevia

eBrevia places extracted provisions beside their original contract text and allows reviewers to edit, annotate, and complete assigned work. The AI Legal Index highlights Lens's ability to answer a new contract question without preparing example files or training a new extraction model. Structured findings can be exported or moved through Connect to other systems. DraftPro adds playbook review in Word and a clause library built from previous agreements in the repository.

Source: AI Legal Index, 2026

LinkSquares

LinkSquares extracts standard contract values for analysis, reports, and visibility over obligations and dates. Its AI Legal Assistant also drafts amendments and stakeholder communications alongside contract questions. The AI Legal Index identifies that combination of agreement data and related legal drafting as a broader workflow capability. The platform supports corporate legal teams managing contracts and requests, with connected review and signing functions available through its wider product offering.

Source: AI Legal Index, 2026

Questions buyers ask

What does Lens mean by working without model training?

It means the reviewer can ask a new question without supplying example agreements or training a custom extraction model for that question. It is a workflow claim and does not, by itself, determine the contractual rules for customer data. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 16, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How can an eBrevia reviewer inspect an extracted term?

Contract Analyzer displays results beside the agreement and lets the reviewer jump to the relevant source language. The reviewer can edit, annotate, or add missing material before completing the work. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 16, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Does LinkSquares' assistant only summarize agreements?

No. Its described uses also include drafting amendments, producing stakeholder communications, redlining, and legal research with citations to public sources. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 16, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Can eBrevia analysis leave its own platform?

Yes. Reports provide structured outputs, and Connect supports importing agreements and pushing extracted data into other systems. The available setup depends on the selected connections and workflow. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 16, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Disclosure

Neither vendor paid for inclusion, placement or a grade, and neither reviewed this page before it published. Everything on it comes from public material on the dates shown. How the index grades.

The shared purchase is contract intelligence, but eBrevia also serves law firm review projects while LinkSquares centers corporate legal operations. Extraction field counts do not establish a comparative measure of legal accuracy.

Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 462 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 16, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746