FirmPilot vs Scorpion: how they compare in 2026

F
FirmPilot profile
S
Scorpion profile
Last verifiedOctober 11, 2026

FirmPilot and Scorpion sell the same outcome to the same firms, more signed cases from Google, ads and AI answer engines without the firm running its own marketing. The difference is in how the work gets done. FirmPilot is software first. Its engine studies competing firms, and agents write, publish and bid from what it finds, with a success manager alongside. Scorpion is a managed service on its own technology, where an account team runs Ranking AI, Advertising AI and Landing Page AI. Its Convert assistant answers calls and messages and books consultations. Pricing follows the same split, with flat monthly tiers from $4,250 at FirmPilot against quoted prices and a 12 month platform term at Scorpion. On recourse, Scorpion indemnifies the firm for its own content and technology, while FirmPilot caps its liability at $100. Scorpion ties leads to signed cases and case value through Clio, and FirmPilot names no live practice system integration. Scorpion says it uses OpenAI models, and FirmPilot describes a proprietary engine.

At a glance

Category
FirmPilotIntake & Client Development
ScorpionIntake & Client Development
Founded
FirmPilotNot published
ScorpionNot published
Headquarters
FirmPilotMiami, Florida, United States
ScorpionNot published
Last verified
FirmPilotOct 11, 2026
ScorpionOct 11, 2026

All 15 axes, side by side

The same grid applied to every vendor in the index, graded from public sources. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

FirmPilot
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.

The engine is the product. FirmPilot's proprietary model, which it calls a Domain Expertise AI model, decides what a firm publishes and what it bids on. It crawls competing firms' websites, ads, links and rankings every 90 minutes and builds content and campaigns from what it finds. Version 2.0, released in October 2025, added agents for blogs, social media and Google Business Profile that write and publish on their own. Legal specific agents run Google Ads bidding and creative, link agents build backlinks, and on page agents find website problems and fix them automatically. Local work covers the Google Business Profile, citations and geographic content, and link building runs as digital PR. The site organizes all of this into three pillars, content and SEO, website optimization, and AI ads and digital presence. In February 2026 FirmPilot announced a model ten times larger in training data for all clients by the third quarter of 2026. Asked whether it is ChatGPT, it answers that it runs on a proprietary AI engine. A dedicated success manager and a reporting dashboard sit beside the engine.

Scorpion
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

RevenueMAX is a set of named AI products wrapped around a hosted website and an account team, and each one runs a different piece of a firm's marketing. Advertising AI learns which leads become retained cases and feeds that signal to the bidding systems of Google, Microsoft and Meta. The terms describe Scorpion's paid advertising software, the Scorpion Advertising Machine, as proprietary AI. Since July 2026 Advertising AI also plans and manages ads inside ChatGPT. Budgets AI moves spend every day toward the channels producing cases, from Google Local Services Ads to Thumbtack and Angi. Ranking AI adjusts SEO as ranking and lead data change, with Scorpion's specialists putting the strategy in place. On the site itself, Landing Page AI writes copy, chooses layouts and images, and drops layouts that underperform. Convert and Scorpion Connect handle the conversation, answering calls, texts and chats around the clock and booking consultations. Leads AI rates every inquiry and how well the firm's team handled it, and Reputation AI times review requests and replies to five star reviews. Video production, call tracking and the account team round out the service.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

FirmPilot
CC on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureAccuracy is asserted without measurement, or grounding is claimed while output cites sources the reader cannot open and verify.

No accuracy or error figure comes with what the engine publishes. The How FirmPilot Works page calls the content fully compliant, accurate and optimized for law firms and says it passes quality checks, without naming the checks or what they compare against. The engine's legal grounding is described by volume, with no named sources for statutes or case law. Blog posts and practice pages it publishes state the law under the firm's name. Under the user terms, FirmPilot does not guarantee that its content is accurate, complete or current, and it disclaims responsibility for content accuracy. The firm in turn warrants that its own content is accurate and not misleading. No check of generated statements about the law against current authority is described.

Scorpion
CC on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureAccuracy is asserted without measurement, or grounding is claimed while output cites sources the reader cannot open and verify.

Nothing Scorpion's AI produces is legal research. The output is marketing copy, ads, review replies and conversations with prospective clients, and no accuracy or error rate is given for any of it. Grounding comes from the firm's own material and from Scorpion's history with other clients. Convert is pretrained on a firm's services, hours and service areas and trained on thousands of real Scorpion client conversations. Scorpion Connect learns each firm's services, story and selling points and answers from them. Generated pages draw on what people look for online, and review replies are tuned for rankings. Scorpion writes up to ten English content pages for a new website. Once the site is live, generated text can state a firm's results, credentials and practice areas, which lawyer advertising rules govern, and no step holds that text to the firm's actual record. Accuracy and completeness are disclaimed in the terms, and no campaign performance is guaranteed.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

FirmPilot
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.

An always on system that runs largely by itself is what FirmPilot sells. The SEO page's FAQ promises regular strategy reviews, content approvals and performance dashboards, and the social media page says a firm's team may review and approve content. The pages for solo, small and larger firms sell the opposite, a system that runs with minimal input and needs no constant creative briefs or approval cycles. On page agents fix website problems automatically, and the Google Ads agents handle bidding and creative with no approval step described. Link agents act on competitors' link data every 90 minutes, and Google Business Profile updates and citations are managed the same way, also without a described review. A December 2025 post on agentic AI says every task is transparent and reviewable, with human oversight where professional ethics demand it. Two case studies describe publishing with very little input from the firm. No threshold, review queue or default holds content or ads until a lawyer approves them.

Scorpion
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.

The firm decides how much of its phone line Convert takes. It runs in one of four modes, covering missed calls only, after hours only, all day in place of a phone menu, or text follow up with leads that did not book. Its messaging assistant hands leads that are ready to close to the firm's team with context. The marketing side runs with less supervision. Pages are created and updated without configuration, five star reviews get automatic replies, and ad spend shifts daily across channels. ChatGPT ad budgets start small and scale with volume and performance. The account team sets strategy and runs campaigns on the firm's behalf, with results visible in the client platform. A new website goes live only after the firm approves it, and the terms let Scorpion refuse, modify or remove firm content. No review queue or approval setting is described for generated ads, pages or review replies before they run under the firm's name.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

FirmPilot
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Six case studies name firms and lawyers. Telaré Law, a personal injury firm across Washington, Oregon, California and Nevada, doubled its case volume in under 12 months. Ballin & Associates in Boston, founded in 1981, went from zero to two cases a year to more than ten new cases a month. Steele Law, a nursing home abuse firm founded in 2015, grew monthly organic leads three to four times within four months. RS Law Group in Philadelphia reports 200 percent more leads and $36,000 saved. MSD Law Firm's study describes quadrupling its team, and Williams Starbuck's carries no figures. Jesse Soffer of The Soffer Firm reports 300 percent more leads year over year in a testimonial, beside quotes from Jessica Arena, John Romano and Cathy Altizer. FirmPilot's headline claims add 180 percent more cases, a 96 percent client retention rate, more than 12,000 leads and more than $30,000 in average annual savings. The SEO FAQ cites one client with twelve times the case volume within five months. None of the studies gives a baseline, a measurement source or a start date. The About page also says FirmPilot is a Google Partner.

Scorpion
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Named law firm clients come with results attached. Arnold & Itkin reports six times the new cases, Owenby Law 75 percent more cases and DUI Heroes twice as many, each with a named attorney. Coker, Robb & Cannon, a client since 2014, reports a sixfold return, 20 percent revenue growth and doubled leads year over year. Mortensen & Reinheimer attributes 80 percent of its revenue to Scorpion. McGee, Lerer & Ogrin reports four times the clients and three new offices, and Turner Law Group seven times the keyword rankings. On the intake side, a Twilio customer story gives Convert a 39 percent higher booking rate, 6,500 appointments and $8.4 million in revenue in its first three months. Convert's October 2025 launch reported 26 percent higher booking rates in beta. Scorpion says Reputation AI brings two to five times more reviews and a half star rise in rating. Most of these figures come without a time period or method, and Coker, Robb & Cannon appears at a sixfold return on its own page and sevenfold in a blog post.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

FirmPilot
CC on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureConfidentiality is asserted in general terms, or the commitment lives only in a sales conversation and cannot be read in advance.

Customer data is handled with FirmPilot as processor or service provider, under reasonable technical and organizational safeguards, and it is stored and processed in the United States, according to the privacy policy updated February 2026. Its user terms take a worldwide, perpetual, royalty free, irrevocable license to use, modify, publish and distribute content the firm submits, and FirmPilot owns all usage data and feedback. Neither document says whether firm content or campaign data trains the engine, and privilege, work product and the separation of competing client firms are not mentioned. Most of what FirmPilot handles is public marketing material and competitor data, alongside lead and performance figures from the firm's own campaigns. FirmPilot says it does not sell personal information, though it shares contact and preference details with third parties for its own direct marketing.

Scorpion
CC on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureConfidentiality is asserted in general terms, or the commitment lives only in a sales conversation and cannot be read in advance.

Firm data stays the firm's property, and Scorpion holds a worldwide, royalty free license to use, adapt and publish it while delivering the subscriptions. Under section 8.3 of the terms, Scorpion may also pool aggregate data across all subscribers for audience insights that can feed general advertising and consumer profiling. The privacy policy, effective August 2024, lets aggregated or deidentified data serve any business purpose. On the Clio side, Scorpion reads lead source, intake status and case values and says it cannot see confidential case data or privileged information. Scorpion also says data sent through OpenAI's APIs does not train public models. Intake conversations hold what prospective clients tell the assistant about their legal problems before any engagement. The terms carry no privilege, work product or prospect confidentiality clause, and nothing in them keeps one firm's data apart from a competing client firm in the same market.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

FirmPilot
BB on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA real position is published on advice versus tooling, short of full treatment: commonly a disclaimer without the supervision and competence dimension, or silence on jurisdiction limits.

Every FirmPilot page carries a footer saying FirmPilot AI, Inc. and FirmPilot are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. Its user terms repeat that FirmPilot is not an attorney or legal advisor. The services page notes that bar advertising rules vary by state and that testimonials may require disclaimers. September 2026 posts tell firms that content written to be quoted by an AI tool is still attorney advertising. Those posts cite ABA Model Rules 7.1 and 7.2 and say ABA Formal Opinion 512 keeps Rule 7.1 duties intact. Meanwhile the agents publish lawyer advertising under the firm's name across its site, Google Business Profile, ads, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and X. Which state rules that content is written to, and who checks each piece, is not described. No warranty covers compliance with applicable law, and the firm stays responsible for the accuracy of its content.

Scorpion
BB on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA real position is published on advice versus tooling, short of full treatment: commonly a disclaimer without the supervision and competence dimension, or silence on jurisdiction limits.

Scorpion sells marketing technology and services, and none of it is offered as legal advice or legal services. Its intake AI is built to stay out of legal advice, with guardrails against promises, predictions and advice and a handoff to staff. On advertising rules, a 2022 post walks firms through ABA Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3, cautions against implying that results will repeat, and points firms to their state bar. The products themselves write and place advertising under the firm's name across the website, landing pages, ads, review replies and chat. Under the terms, the firm keeps its own data lawful. They say nothing about attorney advertising rules, state filing requirements or who reviews content for compliance, and no jurisdiction limit applies to what Scorpion produces.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

FirmPilot
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible AI principles are published without a mechanism, a testing regime, or anything a buyer could audit.

Governance statements sit in FirmPilot's blog. A December 2025 post on agentic AI in legal marketing says every task is transparent and reviewable and that human oversight applies where professional ethics demand it. The How FirmPilot Works page refers to quality checks without naming them. No testing regime or release review is named, and no result is reported on uneven output across practice areas, markets or audiences. The engine learns from what already ranks in a firm's market and writes content shaped by competitors' material, with no described review of that source material. The larger model announced for the third quarter of 2026 has no stated evaluation. The terms and privacy policy say nothing about how the engine is trained or tested. The About page lists a five person leadership team, including John Fly as chief technology officer, with no one described as responsible for AI risk. Ken Hall of DeepWork Capital joined the board with the February 2026 round.

Scorpion
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible AI principles are published without a mechanism, a testing regime, or anything a buyer could audit.

Scorpion's AI governance lives in its law firm blog rather than in a policy or product document. Its February 2026 intake framework sets out written AI policies covering approved tools, vendors and ongoing reviews, guardrails against promises, predictions and advice, encryption, and access limited by role. A January 2026 post gives four standards for choosing AI vendors, among them private environments with clear rules on data use and retention. Matt Bentley, Scorpion's chief data scientist, spoke for the 2023 AI Chat launch. No owner of AI risk, testing regime or release review is named, and results across practice areas, languages or callers are not reported. The assistants learn from Scorpion client conversations, with no account of how those conversations are chosen. RevenueMAX won a 2025 BIG Innovation Award, and Scorpion won a 2026 MarTech Breakthrough Award for lead management.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

FirmPilot
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA generic privacy policy covers the product without addressing what happens to documents and prompts after processing.

Personal information is kept for as long as FirmPilot deems necessary or advisable, under its privacy policy updated February 2026, with reasonable technical and organizational safeguards. The policy names Google Analytics and describes other recipients by category, such as hosting, security, and ediscovery and data room providers. Under its user terms, the service is not a storage system or system of record, carries no duty to store or back up content, and can delete content when the services end. Firms are told to extract and back up their own content. Campaign data and generated content have no retention period, and no incident notice practice is stated. The privacy policy also refers to extracting and analyzing text, WhatsApp and Signal messages, features outside FirmPilot's marketing products.

Scorpion
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA generic privacy policy covers the product without addressing what happens to documents and prompts after processing.

Scorpion acts as processor for a firm's client data and keeps it as the firm instructs and the law requires, under a privacy policy effective August 2024. Individuals can ask to access, correct, delete or limit sharing of their data through dataprivacy@scorpion.co. Under the terms, Scorpion commits to appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards and to applicable privacy law, and sensitive personal information stays out of subscriber data. Scorpion says it encrypts data in transit and at rest, limits access by role and need, and destroys sensitive data by documented methods. Calls are recorded by default under separate recorded call terms, and recordings sit with texts, emails and notes in the client platform. Recordings, chats and AI conversations have no set retention period, subprocessors are not listed, and no incident notice period is stated.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

FirmPilot
DD on AI Liability and RecourseNothing published on who bears the loss when the system is wrong.

Two agreements sit one after the other on FirmPilot's terms page. The FirmPilot AI, Inc. user terms, updated February 2026 under Delaware law, cap the total liability of FirmPilot, its affiliates and suppliers at $100. They exclude liability for unauthorized access to or loss of customer information, lost profits and business interruption. Services come as is and with all faults, with no warranty that they meet the firm's requirements or comply with applicable law, and the firm gets no indemnity. Claims must be brought within two years, with a jury waiver and a 60 day informal resolution period. Above them, FirmPilot, LLC website terms dated November 2022 cap liability at $50 and require JAMS arbitration with a class action waiver. Those older terms carry no explicit choice of law clause and leave carve outs to Florida courts. The page does not say which agreement governs a subscription, and FirmPilot may change the user terms without prior notice.

Scorpion
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA real published position on liability, short of the full picture: commonly a stated indemnity without scope or caps.

Scorpion's customer terms run indemnities both ways. Scorpion covers the firm against claims arising from Scorpion website content or technology, intellectual property infringement and its own breach of data protection duties. The firm covers Scorpion for claims arising from firm data and its use of the subscriptions. Products are warranted to materially conform to their specifications and are otherwise provided as is, with accuracy and completeness disclaimed and replacement as the sole remedy. No campaign performance is guaranteed. The cap on liability clause carries a heading with no figure, and section 8.36 says the limitations are reflected in the pricing. Disputes go to JAMS arbitration in Salt Lake County under Utah law, with a class action waiver. Suspension for nonpayment makes the rest of the term due, and a chargeback counts as a material breach that cannot be cured.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

FirmPilot
CC on Practice Systems Integration DepthIntegrations are listed as logos or marked as coming, with no documentation an implementer could use.

Google Ads, Google Business Profile, Google Analytics and WordPress are FirmPilot's live connections, all on a firm's public marketing side. Google Ads is the only ad platform named. Agents publish to the firm's WordPress site, and the platform supports no other content system. Practice area pages say FirmPilot integrates with a firm's CRM or intake system, and the SEO FAQ says it works with a wide range of CRM and intake systems, without naming one. The February 2026 funding announcement said FirmPilot is developing direct integrations with leading case management systems. No FirmPilot page names Clio, Filevine, MyCase, Litify or any other system as live. FirmPilot offers no integrations page, API or developer documentation. The dashboard reports lead volume, rankings and ad performance by channel, and the RS Law Group study says a client can see return on investment within 60 seconds of logging in.

Scorpion
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

Clio is the deepest connection, under a partnership in which Scorpion and Clio name each other sole preferred partners. Leads flow into Clio Grow, and Scorpion pulls client data and revenue from Clio Manage every day. Lead source, intake status and estimated and actual case values then tie each signed case to the channel that produced it. Revenue Intelligence turns that into four views, by community, by profitability per practice area, by client and by lifetime value. On the intake side, Convert connects to schedulers and books directly where they allow it, and its release notes name Clio and ServiceTitan. Conversion data goes back to Google, Microsoft and Meta to train their bidding. Inside the client platform, one inbox holds texts, calls, emails and notes beside scheduling, invoicing and payments. Connections to other case management systems, document management or electronic billing are not described, and there is no public API or developer documentation.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

FirmPilot
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment model is stated clearly with partial residency detail, or residency is offered without the processing location being addressed, or the tenancy model is stated on its own with no residency detail published.

Clients work in a hosted portal called FirmPilot Portal, and the privacy policy says data is stored and processed in the United States. The hosting provider is referred to but not named, and no tenancy model, region choice or difference between plans is stated. Client websites must run on WordPress, and FirmPilot's agents publish content and changes directly to the firm's own site, alongside its Google Business Profile and social accounts. Export control law of the United States may apply to the platform, according to the user terms. Firms are told to extract and back up their own content, since FirmPilot may delete it when the services end.

Scorpion
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud delivery is implied and neither the tenancy model nor the region is stated.

Everything runs as a hosted service. Firm websites sit on Scorpion's own content management system, and RevenueMAX, Convert and the client platform are delivered from Scorpion's side. AI work runs in Scorpion managed environments on Microsoft Azure and in Scorpion controlled data centers, according to a February 2026 post. No region, tenancy model or processing location is stated for websites, call recordings, chats or AI conversations, and the setup is the same for every firm. A new site launches in four to ten weeks. Website files pass to the firm after 24 full monthly payments or for a one time fee of $10,000. Scorpion's FAQ says a firm owns its website once the contract ends but not the content management system behind it, so a move means a rebuild with another vendor.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

FirmPilot
DD on Security Certifications and Trust CenterNo independent security attestation located.

No SOC 2 report, ISO 27001 certificate, auditor or penetration test is named, and FirmPilot runs no security page or trust center. Its privacy policy refers to reasonable technical and organizational safeguards and to a hosting provider it does not name, and it makes no encryption claim. Firms must keep their own access credentials confidential, and FirmPilot disclaims liability for unauthorized access caused by the firm. Its terms also exclude liability for unauthorized access to or loss of customer information. Data is stored and processed in the United States, and no breach notice period is stated. Agents publish directly to the firm's WordPress site and Google accounts, and how FirmPilot secures that access is not described.

Scorpion
DD on Security Certifications and Trust CenterNo independent security attestation located.

Scorpion keeps its security documentation on a trust portal at trust.scorpion.co. Its customer terms commit to appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards. The website, privacy policy, acceptable use policy and terms name no SOC 2 report, ISO 27001 certificate, auditor or audit period. The privacy policy adds that Scorpion cannot guarantee absolute security. Sensitive personal information is kept out of subscriber data under the terms, and HIPAA appears only inside that definition. Scorpion indemnifies the firm for its own breach of data protection duties. No breach notice period appears in the terms or privacy policy, and no subprocessor list sits beside them.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

FirmPilot
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe vendor refers to advanced or proprietary models without identifying what sits underneath.

The engine is presented as proprietary, a Domain Expertise AI model protected by pending patents, with no patent numbers given. Its FAQ answers the question whether it is ChatGPT with a flat no. Training material is described by volume, more than five million pieces of legal marketing content and more than 3,000 legal cases, and a September 2026 post repeats those figures. In February 2026 FirmPilot announced a next generation model ten times larger in training data, due for all clients by the third quarter of 2026, and no page says whether it shipped. No model, provider, hosting location or change notice appears in its pages, terms or privacy policy. In a February 2026 interview with Refresh Miami, Jake Soffer said FirmPilot uses OpenAI, Anthropic and all the models out there.

Scorpion
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe supply chain is partly disclosed: providers named without change notification, or architecture described without the providers.

OpenAI is the named model provider. Scorpion's February 2026 intake framework says it reaches OpenAI models through APIs and layers its own tools on them inside RevenueMAX. Convert's voice assistant is built on Twilio ConversationRelay, Voice API and Messaging, according to Twilio's customer story. The 2023 AI Chat launch referred to OpenAI's GPT and to training on hundreds of thousands of real customer conversations. Advertising adds two more dependencies. Scorpion has been a technology partner for ChatGPT advertising since July 2026, with direct access to OpenAI's advertising team, and it trains the bidding systems of Google, Microsoft and Meta. No model or model version is named for any product. Scorpion makes no commitment to tell firms when a model or provider changes.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

FirmPilot
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

Three flat monthly prices sit on FirmPilot's pricing page, Lite at $4,250, Firm at $6,900 and Premium at $9,250. They are pitched against agencies that charge a percentage of ad spend, and the PPC page says FirmPilot charges nothing on ad budgets. Each tier shows an invitation to contact FirmPilot in place of a feature list, so what separates the tiers, how much content each includes and whether onboarding costs extra are not stated. No contract term, minimum commitment or notice period appears on the pricing page, and the user terms do not address fees, renewal or termination. The pricing page was last modified in September 2025. Ad budgets are paid separately from the subscription.

Scorpion
CC on Commercial TransparencyPricing is gated behind a demo request while tier names and feature splits are published, so the shape is visible and the number is not.

Scorpion prices each firm after a consultation, and its FAQ says cost depends on the firm's goals. The contract shape is public. Marketing technology typically runs on a 12 month contract, and advertising on Google Ads, Local Services Ads and Meta is typically month to month. Advertising budgets are paid on top of the subscription, and Scorpion helps the firm set them before Budgets AI moves the money between channels. The platform term renews for 12 months unless the firm gives 30 days' written notice, while other subscriptions renew monthly. A nonrefundable activation fee is due at signing, and charges are billed in advance without refunds. Late payments carry interest of up to 1 percent a month. Website files transfer after 24 full payments or for a $10,000 fee. A promotion through the end of October 2026 adds $1,000 toward advertising for new clients. No monthly rate, unit of charge or advertising management percentage is published.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

FirmPilot
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Nine practice areas get their own pages, personal injury, family law, criminal defense and DUI, employment, estate and probate, immigration, business, bankruptcy and general practice. Three more cover solo practices, small firms and mid to large firms. FirmPilot's February 2026 funding post describes the target as firms of two to fifteen attorneys. Case studies span personal injury, employment, commercial litigation and real estate, estate and probate, and nursing home abuse practices in Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. The site serves law firms only, while a current job posting says FirmPilot is expanding into dental, home services and elective medical businesses. A 2024 funding post had already named dentists, plumbers, electricians, veterinarians and chiropractors. Refresh Miami reported about 40 employees in February 2026, with plans for roughly 70. No jurisdiction limit is stated for content written to state advertising rules, and practice areas it does not serve are not named.

Scorpion
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Law firms get their own section of Scorpion's business, with pages for personal injury, criminal defense, family law, immigration, estate and probate, bankruptcy and employment law. Case studies span family law, personal injury, criminal defense and DUI practices. Clients named on its pages include Arnold & Itkin, Coker, Robb & Cannon, Drexler Law and Owenby Law. Scorpion says it has worked with thousands of firms over more than 25 years. It has been a Google partner since 2014 and calls itself Google's largest Local Services Ads provider. Firm size tiers, practice areas it turns away and geographic limits are not stated, and no market is reserved for a single client firm. The same platform and AI products serve home services, franchise, medical and hospital clients. Scorpion bought the digital agency 1SEO in June 2026. The Clio connection is offered in the United States and Canada.

The 12 legal signals, side by side

Recorded rather than graded. These are the questions a practitioner has to answer before a tool touches a client matter, and the answers are taken from public material only.

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

FirmPilot
Terms silent

Neither FirmPilot's user terms, updated February 2026, nor its privacy policy says whether firm content, campaign data or leads train its engine. The terms license content the firm submits worldwide, perpetually and irrevocably, to use, modify, publish and distribute, and to incorporate into any technology now known or later developed. FirmPilot owns all usage data and feedback, along with any improvements based on them.

The engine's training material is described by volume, without saying whether client material is among it. The engine also studies competing firms' content every 90 minutes, and how long that material is kept is not stated. The older FirmPilot, LLC website terms on the same page say nothing on training either.

Scorpion
Permitted, in policy only

Scorpion's assistants learn from its client base. Convert's voice and messaging assistants are described as trained on thousands of real Scorpion client interactions, and the 2023 AI Chat launch cited hundreds of thousands of real customer conversations. The terms license firm data to Scorpion for delivering the subscriptions and let it pool aggregate data across subscribers for audience insights and consumer profiling, without mentioning model training.

Section 8.30 lets Scorpion use feedback and anonymous usage analytics to improve its products and publish benchmarks. For outside models, Scorpion says data sent to OpenAI's APIs does not train public models and that public AI tools which train on submitted data stay away from client work.

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

FirmPilot
Disclosed without a period

Retention runs as long as FirmPilot deems necessary or advisable, under its privacy policy updated February 2026, without a period. Under the user terms, the service is not a storage system or system of record and carries no duty to store or back up content. FirmPilot may delete all content when the services end, or remove it at any time, and firms are told to extract and back up their own content. Generated content, competitor intelligence, campaign records and leads have no retention period, and no deletion route or export facility is described.

The older website terms add that the company is not obligated to back up user content. The privacy policy names FirmPilot AI, Inc. as data controller, acting as processor for customer data.

Scorpion
Disclosed without a period

Client data is kept as the firm instructs and the law requires, with Scorpion acting as processor under a privacy policy effective August 2024 and no set period. Individuals can ask for deletion through dataprivacy@scorpion.co. Inbound calls are recorded by default, and the firm can turn recording off in the platform, with separate recorded call terms incorporated into the agreement. Sensitive data is destroyed by documented methods once it is no longer needed, Scorpion says.

Convert conversations, chat transcripts, lead records and generated content have no retention window, and no zero retention setting is offered. The platform inbox keeps each firm's texts, calls, emails and notes together.

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

FirmPilot
Not addressed

Competing firms can be clients at the same time, each a subject of the other's analysis. FirmPilot crawls competing law firms in a client's market every 90 minutes and builds the client's marketing from what it finds, and its link building service analyzes every link affecting a client's competitors. No separation between client firms' keywords, campaign results or performance data is described, and no limit of one client per market is set.

FirmPilot publishes no client count by market and offers no exclusivity for a practice area or city. Inside a firm, the dashboard and the success manager arrangement come with no documented roles or permissions.

Scorpion
Not addressed

Competing law firms in the same market can all run on the same Scorpion platform and AI products, with no limit of one firm per market. The terms describe no separation of one client firm's data, campaigns and conversations from another's. Aggregate data is pooled across all subscribers for audience insights, and Advertising AI learns from which leads become retained cases. The client platform also shows each firm how it stacks up against competitors.

The Clio connection reads lead source, intake status and case values for each firm. Inside a firm, one shared inbox holds texts, calls, emails and notes, with no documented roles or matter level permissions.

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

FirmPilot
Disclosure addressed, notice absent

Legal process, including subpoenas, and governmental, court or law enforcement requests all get a response under FirmPilot's privacy policy, updated February 2026, with no commitment to notify the client firm. No confidentiality or compelled disclosure clause appears in the user terms. The older FirmPilot, LLC website terms on the same page reserve a right to report users to law enforcement. FirmPilot may suspend access where continuing would create legal, regulatory or compliance risk.

Delaware law governs the user terms, with courts in Miami Dade County or the firm's home state, while the website terms send disputes to JAMS arbitration. How a request for a client firm's leads or campaign data would be handled is not described.

Scorpion
Disclosure addressed, notice absent

Disclosure as required by law is one of the ways Scorpion's privacy policy says it shares information, with no commitment to tell the client firm first. The same list covers service providers, affiliates and parties to a business transfer. The policy makes Scorpion the processor and the client firm the controller of client data. The acceptable use policy says Scorpion's reporting of misuse may include disclosing appropriate customer information.

The confidentiality clause in the customer terms, governed by Utah law, has no compelled disclosure or notice provision. The privacy policy itself gives a Valencia, California address. Call recordings, chat transcripts and lead records sit with Scorpion, and no process for handling a subpoena for them is described.

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

FirmPilot
Sources named, basis unstated

Training material is described as more than five million pieces of legal marketing content and more than 3,000 legal cases, and FirmPilot has also said it mines cases, legislation, legal news and videos. The services hub says the technology works from more than five million pieces of real legal content. The engine also crawls competing firms' websites, ads and social output every 90 minutes, and whether that material joins the training set is not stated.

No database, publisher or supplier is named for the case collection, and no rights basis, jurisdiction list or update cadence is given. Whether FirmPilot honors robots directives when it crawls competitors' sites is not stated. The engine's patents are described as pending, without numbers.

Scorpion
Not addressed

The material behind Scorpion's AI is marketing data. Its assistants and page generators work from a firm's own services, hours, service areas and website, from Scorpion's history of client conversations and campaign results, and from ranking and advertising signals. Convert is pretrained on the firm's information and trained on thousands of Scorpion client interactions. Keyword and content choices come from ranking and lead data, and landing page copy from what people look for online.

None of it draws on case law, statutes or legal commentary. Scorpion names no source for statements about the law in generated practice area pages or answers.

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

FirmPilot
Not addressed

No citation practice is described for the content FirmPilot publishes, and no check of whether a statute or case behind an article is still in force. Blog posts and practice pages published under a firm's name make statements about the law in its practice areas, and no review of earlier content is described when the law changes. The engine's case collection is described by count alone, with no named court, jurisdiction or date range.

The How FirmPilot Works page calls the content fully compliant and accurate without naming the test behind that claim. Under its terms, FirmPilot does not guarantee that its content is accurate, complete or current.

Scorpion
Not addressed

Scorpion's AI writes marketing copy and intake replies that cite no legal authority. Pages, ads, review replies and conversations can still state the law, and no step tests those statements against current authority before they run under a firm's name. Scorpion writes up to ten English content pages for a new site, which launch after the firm approves them. After launch, pages update automatically and five star reviews get automatic replies.

The terms disclaim the accuracy and completeness of Scorpion's products and leave the lawfulness of firm content with the firm.

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

FirmPilot
Not addressed

Generation and publication run continuously and automatically, and no case is described in which the engine declines a topic, holds a piece back or flags it for a person. The How FirmPilot Works page says content passes quality checks, without saying what a failed check produces. A December 2025 post says every agent task is transparent and reviewable. The pages for solo and small firms say the system runs with minimal input and needs no approval cycles, and on page agents fix website problems automatically.

The social media page says a firm's team may review and approve content. Two case studies, MSD Law Firm and Williams Starbuck, describe publishing with very little input or minimal lift from the firm.

Scorpion
Documented

Guardrails stop Scorpion's intake AI from making promises, predictions or giving advice, with clear escalation to staff when needed, and Scorpion says the AI avoids crossing into legal advice. Convert's messaging assistant escalates when needed and hands leads that are ready to close to the firm's team with context. The firm chooses one of four modes, from missed calls only to answering all day. Scorpion Connect answers questions around the clock, including in other languages, and can book appointments and take payments. Leads AI then rates each inquiry and how well the firm's team handled it.

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

FirmPilot
None located

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming FirmPilot. FirmPilot's engine writes marketing content and ads for law firms rather than court filings, and no accuracy or error figure is given for it.

Scorpion
None located

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Scorpion. Scorpion's AI writes marketing content, ads and intake conversations rather than court filings, and no accuracy or error rate is given for it.

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

FirmPilot
Named guidance addressed

September 2026 posts on generative engine optimization and landing pages tell firms that content written to be quoted by an AI tool is still attorney advertising. They cite ABA Model Rule 7.1 and say ABA Formal Opinion 512 keeps Rule 7.1 duties intact. Posts on divorce and family law advertising cite Rule 7.2, and the services page notes that bar advertising rules vary by state. None of this material describes how FirmPilot's own agents apply those rules.

Product pages do not cite the rules, and results claims such as 180 percent more cases carry no attorney advertising notice. No warranty in the user terms covers compliance with applicable law.

Scorpion
Named guidance addressed

Lawyer advertising guidance comes from a 2022 post on legal marketing rules that cites ABA Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3. It cautions against wording that suggests a past result will repeat and sends firms to their state bar's rules. Scorpion's February 2026 intake framework says its technology supports professional obligations and keeps its intake AI from giving advice. Neither post ties a rule to how Scorpion's AI writes pages, ads, review replies or intake answers.

The terms leave legal compliance of firm content with the firm and contain no advertising rules clause, and no product setting reflects a state's rules.

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

FirmPilot
Outside the fee relationship

Flat subscription fees of $4,250, $6,900 or $9,250 a month pay for FirmPilot, with ad spend outside them and no percentage taken. The work happens before an engagement exists, on visibility, leads and case acquisition, and none of it addresses what a lawyer charges a client. No contract term, minimum commitment or onboarding fee is stated, and the pricing page was last modified in September 2025. Reporting covers lead volume, rankings, ad performance and return on marketing spend. The About page claims more than $30,000 in average annual savings for clients, without a method.

Scorpion
Outside the fee relationship

Revenue Intelligence measures the firm's own marketing in cost per signed client, case value by channel, profitability by practice area and lifetime client value. None of Scorpion's AI addresses what a lawyer charges a client, since the products work before an engagement exists. The client platform does include invoicing and payment tools, and Scorpion Connect can accept payments as well as book appointments. Scorpion charges the firm under its own subscription terms, with a 12 month platform term that renews unless the firm gives 30 days' notice and advertising typically month to month. A promotion through October 2026 adds $1,000 toward advertising for new clients.

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

FirmPilot
Not addressed

No subprocessor or model provider list, data processing addendum or disclosure pack is published. The privacy policy names Google Analytics and otherwise describes recipients by category, including hosting, security, and ediscovery and data room providers. Third party providers, licensors and suppliers appear in the user terms only as a category, and FirmPilot's own pages name no AI provider. No SOC 2 report or ISO 27001 certificate is named, and FirmPilot runs no security page.

In a February 2026 interview with Refresh Miami, its chief executive said FirmPilot uses OpenAI, Anthropic and other models, none of which appears in the privacy policy. FirmPilot may change its user terms without prior notice.

Scorpion
Not addressed

OpenAI and Microsoft Azure are the providers Scorpion names, in its February 2026 intake framework. Its website carries no subprocessor list, data processing addendum or client disclosure pack. The privacy policy names categories of recipients, such as service providers, affiliates and parties to a business transfer. The customer terms describe safeguards in general words and incorporate recorded call terms by reference.

Security documentation sits on a trust portal at trust.scorpion.co, while the website, privacy policy and terms name no SOC 2 report or ISO 27001 certificate. Scorpion's Clio integration FAQ spells out the data it reads, lead source, intake status and estimated and actual case values, and says it has no access to privileged information. An April 2026 post tells firms to get written answers from AI vendors on data storage, subprocessors and breach protocols.

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

FirmPilot
Not addressed

The dashboard reports what campaigns produced, with no record of which content the agents generated, when it published or whether a person approved it. FirmPilot's output is marketing content and ads rather than court filings, and it offers no disclosure guidance or record of AI involvement. By its own terms, the service is not a system of record. Social posts go out on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and X under the firm's name, and blog and Google Business Profile posts publish the same way.

Scorpion
Not addressed

Call recordings, an inbox of texts, calls, emails and notes, and the attribution of leads to signed cases are the records Scorpion's platform keeps. None of them marks which model produced a page, ad or reply. Scorpion offers no court disclosure guidance, since its output is marketing content and intake conversations rather than court filings. Pages update automatically after a site launches. Product pages and terms name no model, and Scorpion makes no commitment to tell firms when a provider changes.

What neither one publishes

The questions both sides leave open

Derived from the records above rather than written, so it cannot favor either vendor. Take these into both conversations and ask each side the same question.

Axes where neither earns credit
  • Security Certifications and Trust Center
Signals neither addresses in public material
  • Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
  • Good Law Verification
  • Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
  • Court Disclosure Support

Which one fits

Choose FirmPilot if

  • You want software doing the work an agency does, at a flat price. FirmPilot's tiers start at $4,250 a month, it takes no percentage of ad spend, and it pairs its engine with a dedicated success manager.
  • You want your marketing shaped by what already ranks in your market. FirmPilot crawls competing firms' websites, ads, links and rankings every 90 minutes, and its agents write blog posts, social posts and Google Business Profile updates and run Google Ads bidding from what they find.
  • You want to be quoted by AI answer engines as well as found on Google. FirmPilot builds its content for both, and its 2026 posts tell firms that content written to be quoted by an AI tool is still attorney advertising under ABA Model Rule 7.1.

Choose Scorpion if

  • You want missed calls and late night inquiries answered and booked. Scorpion's Convert answers calls in place of a phone menu, after hours or only when the team misses one. It replies to texts, chats, forms and Local Services Ads leads and books consultations through connected schedulers.
  • You run Clio and want marketing measured in signed cases. Scorpion is Clio's sole preferred marketing partner, sends leads into Clio Grow, and reads intake status and case values from Clio Manage daily to report case value by channel and cost per signed client.
  • You want a managed team as well as the technology. Scorpion assigns a dedicated account manager and team, builds and hosts the website, and covers SEO, Google, Microsoft, Meta and ChatGPT ads, Local Services Ads, reviews, video and landing pages from one vendor.

In summary

FirmPilot

FirmPilot is an AI marketing engine for law firms from FirmPilot AI, Inc. of Miami, sold as a replacement for a digital marketing agency. It crawls competing firms' websites, ads, links and rankings every 90 minutes. Agents for blogs, social media, Google Business Profile and Google Ads then write, publish and bid from what the crawl finds, for both Google and AI answer engines. According to the AI Legal Index, FirmPilot charges three flat monthly prices from $4,250 and takes no percentage of ad spend, and its 2026 posts cite ABA Model Rule 7.1. Its terms cap liability at $100, and no live integration with a firm's practice systems is named.

Source: AI Legal Index, 2026

Scorpion

Scorpion is a digital marketing company for law firms and other local businesses, run by Scorpion Enterprises, LLC under founder and chief executive Rustin Kretz. Its RevenueMAX offer pairs a dedicated account team with AI products for SEO, paid ads, landing pages and reviews. Convert, its AI voice and messaging assistant, answers leads and books consultations. According to the AI Legal Index, Scorpion uses OpenAI models through APIs and runs its AI work on Microsoft Azure and in its own data centers. It ties leads to signed cases through Clio, quotes prices on a 12 month platform term, and indemnifies the firm for Scorpion's own content and technology.

Source: AI Legal Index, 2026

Questions buyers ask

FirmPilot vs Scorpion: which is better for a personal injury firm?

Both sell to personal injury firms and name personal injury clients. FirmPilot suits a firm that wants an engine built on competitor crawling, flat listed pricing and content aimed at AI answer engines, with a success manager rather than an agency team. Scorpion suits a firm that wants a managed team, AI call and message answering through Convert, and reporting tied to signed cases and case value through Clio. Scorpion's case studies include Arnold & Itkin, and FirmPilot's include Telaré Law and Ballin & Associates. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 11, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How much do FirmPilot and Scorpion cost?

FirmPilot charges three flat monthly tiers, Lite at $4,250, Firm at $6,900 and Premium at $9,250, with ad spend paid separately and no percentage taken. Scorpion quotes prices after a consultation. Its FAQ says marketing technology typically runs on a 12 month contract and advertising month to month. Its terms add a nonrefundable activation fee and a $10,000 buyout for website files before 24 monthly payments. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 11, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Who approves what goes out under the firm's name?

FirmPilot's SEO FAQ promises content approvals and its social page says a firm may review posts, while its small firm pages sell running without approval cycles. Scorpion's terms launch a new website after the firm approves it, but Landing Page AI updates pages automatically and Reputation AI posts replies to five star reviews without a described approval step. Both leave the legal compliance of published content with the firm. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 11, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Which AI models do FirmPilot and Scorpion use?

A February 2026 post on Scorpion's law firm blog says it uses OpenAI models through secure APIs. The same post says its AI work runs on Microsoft Azure and in its own data centers. Twilio's customer story places Convert's voice assistant on Twilio ConversationRelay. FirmPilot describes a proprietary engine trained on legal marketing content and legal cases and says it is not ChatGPT, while its chief executive told Refresh Miami that it uses OpenAI and Anthropic. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 11, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

What do FirmPilot and Scorpion both leave open on data?

FirmPilot names no SOC 2 report, ISO certificate, subprocessor list or data processing addendum. Scorpion keeps its security documentation on a trust portal, and its website names none of those either. Neither sets a retention period for AI conversations or generated content, and neither gives an accuracy measure for what its AI writes. Neither describes how one client firm's data is kept apart from a competing client in the same market, although both sell to competing firms in the same practice areas and cities. From the AI Legal Index, based on each vendor's own published materials as of October 11, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Disclosure

Neither vendor paid for inclusion, placement or a grade, and neither reviewed this page before it published. Everything on it comes from public material on the dates shown. How the index grades.

FirmPilot's terms page carries two agreements, current user terms capping liability at $100 and earlier website terms capping it at $50, and the page does not say which governs. Scorpion's cap on liability clause carries a heading with no figure, and Scorpion keeps the website files until the firm has made 24 monthly payments or pays $10,000. FirmPilot trains its engine on legal marketing content and cases, and Scorpion trains its assistants on its own client conversations. Neither describes how competing client firms' data is kept apart. Neither vendor reviewed this page.

Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 430 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 14, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746