&

&AI

Every capability &AI sells is model work: agentic prior art search across patents, nonpatent literature and product materials, claim chart evidence proposed element by element with a relevance rationale, claim constructions generated from the patent and its history, drafted contentions and expert reports, structured analysis across thousands of documents, and the assistant Andy working across all of it. &AI's pricing page says credits pay for the AI and the actions that use heavy compute, which is every action a customer buys. Without the models, what is left is a document store and an export formatter.

The claim charts page says every citation points to a specific passage, figure or timestamp in the source, and that exported charts contain only exact quotations and references. The Charts post says each proposed piece of evidence carries a short relevance rationale, and reports that in an internal review of exported charts about 83 percent of the evidence in the final export was present in the first pass, for both invalidity and evidence of use charts.

The test set is described only as exported charts, the measure is closer to recall than to accuracy, and no failure mode is named. Nothing states what the system does when no support is found. Drafted contentions and reports, which do contain generated text, carry no published measure. The terms say AI output can be incorrect and place responsibility for it on the user.

For claim charts, the product page states that every citation requires the user's approval before it appears in any exported work product, and that no generated content appears in any part of an exported chart, from citations to boilerplate: only exact quotations and references. The product separates modes clearly (search, charts, drafts, tables, pitch and the Andy assistant), and &AI's stated purpose is that the AI handles volume while lawyers make the judgments.

The approval gate applies to Charts only; Drafts and Andy produce generated text under a general expectation of review, with no equivalent gate.

Early customers at large law firms used the platform to build thousands of claim charts and reported average time savings of 70 to 90 percent, according to &AI's February 2025 release. The product pages say its charts are used in active IPR and district court proceedings. The pricing page publishes average credits per claim chart and per search over the 90 days to July 2026, which shows production use at volume. No customer is named; the named practitioners on the home page are an advisory board, not customers.

The home and security pages say data stays private and under the customer's control, that &AI and its subprocessors never train on customer or client data, and that zero data retention agreements are in place with model providers. The Terms of Service, effective 18 June 2026, grant &AI a nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, sublicensable and transferable license to reproduce, modify, prepare derivative works of and otherwise use content users upload.

They also state that &AI may make that content available to other users of the platform. The privacy policy lists artificial intelligence engine providers among the service providers that may receive information and contains no training commitment in its body. Nothing addresses privilege or work product, segregation between matters, or retention of uploaded case material.

&AI's terms state that AI sometimes produces incorrect or inapplicable outcomes and that the user is solely responsible for the accuracy and use of output. Self serve accounts are limited to verified patent practitioners and other approved users, which expressly include investment funds and universities, and the product is marketed for analysis ready for trial and for invalidity arguments. No statement says the output is not legal advice, nothing addresses competence or supervision duties when relying on a chart or contention, and no jurisdiction limits are stated.

No responsible AI policy, testing regime, accountable owner or discussion of uneven output is published. &AI's post on its name sets out a view that AI handles volume and lawyers handle judgment, and its home page lists an advisory board of patent litigators; neither is a governance framework for model behavior.

The security page states encryption in transit and at rest, single sign on and access control by role aligned to least privilege, and cites zero data retention agreements with model providers, so inputs are not retained by them. It says &AI's trust center lists subprocessors. The privacy policy states only that personal information is kept as long as necessary, says nothing about uploaded case material, and gives no deletion commitment or incident notification; the terms' perpetual content license survives termination. No retention or deletion period for &AI's own storage is published.

&AI's terms provide the service and all output as is, with no warranty that output is free of errors. They state that the user is solely responsible for the accuracy, quality and usability of output and that &AI has no liability for it, and they cap aggregate liability at the greater of one hundred dollars or fees paid in the prior twelve months. The indemnity runs from the user to &AI. No vendor indemnity, output warranty or insurance position is published.

No integration into practice systems is published. The platform draws on patent and product data sources and exports charts with configurable formatting, and the Enterprise plan offers custom integrations, but no document management, Microsoft Word, docketing or matter management connection is named or documented.

The pricing page offers Enterprise customers single tenant architecture or self hosted models, and the terms and privacy policy state that information is transferred to and processed in the United States. No region choice is offered, the self hosted option is not described further, and the processing location for calls to third party models is not separated from storage.

The security page says &AI holds a SOC 2 Type II attestation and that the report can be requested through its trust center, which also lists certifications and subprocessors. The auditor, the report period and whether the request is self serve are not stated outside the trust center.

The security page refers to agreements with &AI's model providers for zero data retention, the privacy policy lists artificial intelligence engine providers among its service providers, and the Enterprise plan offers self hosted models. No model, provider or version is named on the site or in the terms, and no change notification is described; the terms reserve the right to change the services without notice.

The pricing page publishes credits at $0.40 each with no commitment, a Pro plan at $625 per user per month including 2,500 credits with further credits at $0.25, a 20 percent annual discount, and custom Enterprise terms. An Opportunities option costs $175 per user and $50 per attorney who is not a user. The page converts the unit into work: over the 90 days to July 2026 an average claim chart used 241 credits and an average prior art search 176, so a chart costs $96.40 or $48.20 depending on plan.

The terms add automatic renewal and a seven day trial with 1,000 credits. What implementation adds is not stated, and Enterprise rates are withheld.

&AI names law firms from the Am Law 100 to IP boutiques, plaintiff and defense counsel, and in house teams for litigation preparation, infringement mining and transactions. It covers invalidity under sections 101, 102, 103 and 112, evidence of use, IPR and district court work. Its comparison page says work centered on prosecution and drafting is better served by a named competitor. Patent coverage is described as major jurisdictions without a list, and government use is not addressed.