C
CasePeer
CasePeer is cloud case management software built only for plaintiff personal injury and mass tort law firms. The core is the injury case file: medical treatment and provider tracking, injury records, liens and letters of protection, a settlement calculator with distribution and expense tracking, client trust tracking, statute of limitations alerts, timelines, and document management with unlimited storage and electronic signature.
Intake and CRM tools cover leads, case sources, intake forms and a portal, with case grading on higher tiers. Clients get two way texting and a portal. Reporting is a focus, with more than fifty reports plus productivity, medical request and multi office suites. The AI is 8am IQ, included on the Pro and Advanced tiers. Its Writing Assistant fixes grammar, simplifies and adjusts tone, and its Translation Assistant covers English, Spanish and Arabic.
Payments run through sister brand LawPay. Integrations include medical records retrieval, client messaging, and AI demand letter partners such as EvenUp, Novo and Practice AI. Three per user tiers are priced publicly, with no long term contract or setup fee. CasePeer was founded in 2015, is based in Austin, Texas, and is run by 8am, LLC, formerly AffiniPay, which also owns MyCase, Docketwise and LawPay.
CasePeer, head to head
Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.
Alternatives to CasePeer
Vendors in the same categories as CasePeer whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.
Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.
- NNeosNeos is cloud case management software built for plaintiff personal injury firms.
- LLaw Practice AILaw Practice AI is AI software for plaintiff law firms, founded in 2019 and based in Woodland Hills, California.
- PPrecedentPrecedent is a case automation platform for plaintiff personal injury law firms, from Precedent LLC of Charlotte, North Carolina, whose founders the company describes as insurance carrier insiders.
- CCloudLexCloudLex is case management software built only for plaintiff personal injury firms in the United States, covering a case from intake to settlement.
- EEsquireTekEsquireTek is a written discovery platform and service from EsquireTek, Inc. of San Diego, built for plaintiff trial lawyers, litigation firms and corporate legal teams.
- FFilevineFilevine is case management software for law firms and legal teams, built around the life of a matter from intake to settlement.
Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the 15 capability axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.
Capability grades
All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.
AI Centrality
How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.
8am IQ comes down to two features on CasePeer's pricing matrix: a Writing Assistant and a Translation Assistant. They work inside notes, tasks and text messages, fixing grammar, simplifying language, shifting tone between professional, empathetic and assertive, and translating between English, Spanish and Arabic. That is a communication aid on a case management platform that stands without it, and the Basic tier has no AI at all.
CasePeer's own page for machine readers leads with case grading, treatment tracking, lien resolution, settlement distribution and reporting, with 8am IQ as one line of fourteen. Heavier AI work reaches CasePeer customers through partners, such as EvenUp, Novo and Practice AI for demand letters and Arctrieval for records retrieval. Those are other vendors' models.
Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure
Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.
The product produces no legal authority: 8am IQ rewrites and translates the user's own text, so checks on citations and good law do not apply. CasePeer's AI page says every response points back to its source so the user can check it before anything goes out. Nothing explains what a source means for a tone rewrite, how it is shown, or how a user would follow it. Terms of Service Part III says 8am IQ may produce errors, omissions or inaccuracies, that 8am does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any Output, and that the customer alone must check accuracy before relying on it.
Where the page and the agreement differ, the agreement governs. No accuracy figure, test set, error rate or evaluation is published.
Autonomy and Oversight Model
What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.
Terms of Service Part III says 8am IQ does not give legal advice, the customer may not rely on Output in place of professional judgment or human review, and the customer alone must evaluate Output before relying on it. The IQ Usage Policy adds that all outputs should be reviewed and sources checked. The assistant proposes text in a note, task or message that the user edits and sends, so nothing reaches a client until a person sends it.
The firm's Account Owner controls whether 8am IQ is available, and the agreement tells the firm to set this in line with its own policies and professional duties. The control is on or off for the whole firm, so a firm cannot give the assistant to lawyers and withhold it from intake staff or case managers, who also draft client messages here. No threshold, confidence signal or limit by type of work is published, and what happens when the system is wrong is covered only by a disclaimer.
Operational and Outcome Evidence
Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.
Three testimonials on CasePeer's pricing page name a person, role and firm: the founder of Josh Jones Law, P.A., a cofounder of Sam and Ash, LLP, and the founder of Oscar A. Garza Law. No figure is tied to a named firm, no deployment is dated, and no result is given with a basis. Review site scores are published, including G2 at 4.7 from 188 reviews and Capterra at 4.8 from 216. The AI page cites survey findings that 69 percent of legal professionals use AI and 38 percent save one to five hours a week; those describe the profession, not this product, and the page does not claim otherwise. CasePeer also publishes a case studies library.
Privilege and Confidentiality Posture
How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.
The 8am agreement, which CasePeer's footer adopts, bars training on customer content, covering models built by 8am and by third parties. It says the models behind 8am IQ may keep IQ Content for up to thirty days and may not train on it. Access is documented at the level a firm sets up: permission groups, detailed user permissions, two factor authentication and role based access. Privilege and work product are not addressed in the agreement, the AI page, the security material or the page for machine readers, though the platform holds a contingency practice's whole case file, including medical records, treatment histories and settlement talks.
Nothing describes separation between matters or users within a firm beyond the permission model, and no retention period is stated for case content, since the agreement points to an unpublished Data Retention policy.
UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture
Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.
In documents CasePeer adopts, the platform is for legal, accounting and other client based professionals in the United States and Canada, which sets who may subscribe and where. 8am says it does not give legal advice or practice law, and customers must use the platform in line with the professional conduct rules of their profession. Unauthorized practice is banned twice, in the Terms of Service and in the IQ Usage Policy.
The policy bars practicing law without authorization or giving tailored legal advice without a qualified person reviewing it, and says the models are not tuned to give legal advice and should not be the only source of it. 8am IQ is one on or off switch for the whole firm, held by the Account Owner, with no control by role or user; intake specialists and case managers use the platform and the assistant drafts messages to clients, so a firm cannot limit it to lawyers. CasePeer's own marketing pages say nothing about professional responsibility.
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.
The 8am IQ Usage Policy, updated 19 August 2025, names CasePeer IQ, is part of the agreement through the Terms of Service, and sets enforcement steps from a request to change up to suspension or termination. It bars use of 8am IQ for illegal activity, hateful, harassing or violent content, malware, and high risk physical or economic harm, including automated decisions on credit, jobs or public benefits. It also bars fraud, and high risk government decisions in policing, criminal justice, migration and asylum.
Three bans address bias and rights directly: no facial recognition of private individuals, no classifying people by protected characteristics, and no biometric identification. The tool terms add a no training covenant, a thirty day model retention limit, a human review requirement and a firm wide on or off control. No one is named as accountable for AI, nothing describes testing before an IQ feature ships, and no results are published.
The policy governs what the customer may do, not how 8am builds the tool. Nothing addresses whether output is even across the people a personal injury practice serves, including the clients who do not read English that the translation feature is aimed at.
AI Safety and Data Stewardship
Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.
On AI, the agreement says the language models behind 8am IQ may keep IQ Content for up to thirty days and will not train on it. Inputs and outputs may be reviewed by aggregated human and automated means for accuracy, safety and performance. Access control is documented item by item: encrypted connections with multifactor authentication for production access, network segmentation, unique authentication for production data, role based access, and two factor authentication for all users.
There is also a password policy, central log management with alerts, annual third party penetration testing with deadlines for fixes, and background checks on all staff. Customer data is deleted or deidentified after the retention period when a customer leaves, with export and deletion rights kept. No subprocessor list exists: the only third parties named are payment processors, and the AI providers are never identified. 8am does not commit to tell customers of a breach of its own systems; the incident clause runs the other way, requiring the customer to notify within 24 hours and leaving 8am alone to decide whether any notice is given. No retention period is stated for case content.
AI Liability and Recourse
What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.
Total liability under the 8am agreement is capped at the net fees earned in the three months before the event. Indirect, incidental, special, consequential, exemplary and punitive damages, and loss of profits, revenue, goodwill, use and data, are excluded. Claims must be brought within one year. The platform is provided as is, with all warranties disclaimed, including that information will be accurate, complete or lawful.
The AI clause says 8am is not liable for any damages from errors in Output, reliance on Output, or any failure of 8am IQ. No indemnity runs to the customer. The only indemnity runs from the customer to 8am, and covers 8am's staff time if it must answer a subpoena about the customer's account. A certificate of insurance is listed on the trust center, available on request, with no stated scope. No service level, output warranty, data breach indemnity or insurance terms are published.
Practice Systems Integration Depth
How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.
CasePeer's pricing matrix names twenty one connectors. The page for machine readers groups them: LawPay for payments; QuickBooks Online, Milestones and Lead Docket for operations; EvenUp, Novo and Practice AI for AI demand letters and case summaries; and Arctrieval for medical and billing record requests. Case Status, Hona, Kenect and RingCentral handle client messaging, calls and fax; Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft Word and OneDrive handle documents; and Google and Outlook calendars and Zapier complete the list.
Direction is stated for a few: Novo syncs finished documents back to case files, and Arctrieval syncs records and provider details to cases. LawPay, a sister brand, is built in for trust compliant payments. API access is a new Advanced tier feature, but no public API reference for CasePeer is published; the parent's developer portal covers its payments and referral APIs, not this product. For most connectors nothing says what moves, in which direction, or what a firm must set up, and CasePeer describes its API library as growing rather than defined.
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.
Hosting with AWS and automated rolling backups appear in the pricing matrix, and CasePeer's FAQ says data is hosted and backed up with Amazon Web Services in a certified environment. No region is named and no residency option is offered or refused, though the platform is sold in the US and Canada under an agreement that names both. No tenancy model, shared or isolated, is described, and nothing separates where data is stored from where it is processed.
The agreement says the models behind 8am IQ may keep prompts and outputs for up to thirty days and never says where those models run. The parent's trust center at trust.8am.com is hosted by Vanta.
Security Certifications and Trust Center
Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.
Two certifications are claimed specifically: SOC 2 Type 2, stated as current with the report available through the trust center, and PCI DSS v4.0.1 compliance through the built in LawPay payments, along with IOLTA trust accounting compliance. A detailed control list covers infrastructure and application access. It also covers operations, including annual third party penetration testing with deadlines for fixes and annual control self assessments, and personnel and governance, including background checks, confidentiality agreements, an annual board briefing on cyber and privacy risk, and a whistleblower channel.
The parent's agreement names 8am CasePeer expressly, and CasePeer's footer links the parent's trust center as its security page. No auditor, report period or certificate number is given. 8am says the SOC 2 report, PCI attestations, a security questionnaire and a certificate of insurance are available on request through its trust center, which is hosted by Vanta.
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.
The tool terms say 8am IQ runs on large language models, and that those models may keep IQ Content for up to thirty days. No model, version or provider is named, nothing says where inference runs, and no commitment to notify customers of changes is published. There is no subprocessor list, and the only third parties named in the agreement are payment processors. CasePeer's AI page says there is no third party AI, while the agreement says the models 8am uses may keep content for thirty days and bars the customer from using IQ Content to improve any AI system built by 8am or a third party, which contemplates outside models.
The tool terms also name Claude as an example of a third party service that is not an 8am feature and is governed by the customer's own agreement with that provider.
Commercial Transparency
Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.
CasePeer's Basic tier is $79, Pro $119 and Advanced $149, each per user per month, stated on the pricing page and in the FAQ. There is no limit on how many attorneys and staff may use it, and the price depends on active users. A comparison matrix of about seventy rows across nine groups marks each item as included, optional or add on by tier. There is no long term contract or setup fee. Tier changes either way can be made at any time and are prorated, cancellation is possible at any time, and guided implementation and live training are included.
Electronic signature and data migration are optional extras. 8am IQ is included with Pro and Advanced at no extra cost and absent from Basic, as stated on the pricing page, in the FAQ and on the AI page. Prices for electronic signature and data migration are not published, and the agreement reserves extra fees for usage above thresholds in the pricing pages or an order form, without publishing the thresholds.
Firm and Practice Coverage
Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.
CasePeer's segment is named and exclusive: plaintiff personal injury and mass tort law firms, from solo practices to multi office operations, repeated as the product's organizing claim. Roles are listed and the tiers are built around them: managing attorneys and owners, case managers and paralegals, intake specialists, and operations and firm administrators. Practice coverage shows in the data model: medical treatment and provider tracking, injury tracking, liens and letters of protection, a settlement calculator with distribution and expense tracking, case grading, mass tort tracking and statute of limitations alerts.
CasePeer defines itself against general platforms that try to serve every practice area, saying it is built only for plaintiff personal injury and that general tools force firms to retrofit workflows. The agreement adds a geographic limit: the platform is for professionals in the United States and Canada. In house and government use do not apply to a plaintiff contingency product and are not claimed.
4 public documents
The public pages on file for CasePeer, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.
-
8am.com/terms-of-service5 signals
Client Data in Training, Prompt and Output Retention, Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice and 2 more
Read Sep 12, 2026
-
casepeer.com/feature-legal-ai-tools4 signals
Primary Law Corpus Provenance, Good Law Verification, Billing and Fee Posture and 1 more
Read Sep 12, 2026
-
8am.com/iq-usage-policy1 signal
Bar Guidance Alignment
Read Sep 12, 2026
-
casepeer.com/pricing1 signal
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Read Sep 12, 2026
$79 per user per month
- CasePeer publishes its prices plainly, and charges the same rate for everyone at your firm rather than selling different kinds of seat.
- There are three tiers, all per person per month: Basic at $79, Pro at $119 and Advanced at $149. There is no cap on how many attorneys and staff you add, and what you pay tracks how many active users you have.
- The AI is the main thing that separates Basic from Pro. The 8am IQ writing and translation assistant is not on Basic at all, and is included at no extra cost on Pro and Advanced. Advanced mainly adds deeper reporting, an intake investigator portal, case grades and API access.
- There is no setup fee and no long term contract. You can move up or down a tier whenever you like, and the change is prorated. Electronic signature and data migration cost extra, and those prices are not published.
- CasePeer's website says you can cancel at any time, but the contract says canceling takes effect at your next renewal date, with no refund for the rest of a period you have already paid for.
Three published tiers, priced per user per month in US dollars. The rate depends on active users, with no limit on how many attorneys or staff may be added. Basic at $79 covers case and contact management, tasks, the client portal, statute alerts, settlement negotiations, medical treatment tracking, case expense and client trust tracking, calendaring and unlimited document storage. Pro at $119, marked most popular, adds intake management, unlimited two way texting with images, case stage screens, litigation event plans, and the high value cases, medical requests and firm productivity reports.
It also adds more than fifty other reports, twenty plus key integrations, and 8am IQ. Advanced at $149 adds text scheduling, data sync for reporting, multi office reporting, the intake investigator portal, case grades and API access, the last marked new. A comparison matrix of about seventy rows across nine groups marks each item included, optional or add on by tier, with electronic signature and data migration as extras on every tier.
The AI gate is stated in three places, the matrix, the pricing FAQ and the AI page: 8am IQ is included with Pro and Advanced at no extra cost and not available on Basic. The matrix lists the 8am IQ Writing Assistant and the 8am IQ Translation Assistant separately. The page states no long term contract, no setup fee, tier changes at any time with proration, cancellation at any time, guided implementation and free training, and support by phone, email and chat.
The agreement adds terms the page does not. Subscriptions renew automatically monthly or yearly, and fees are final and not refundable. Users or upgrades added mid term on an annual plan are prorated and charged at once. Late payment carries interest at the lesser of 1.5 percent a month or the legal maximum, and price changes apply from the next subscription period after written notice.
Confidentiality and data terms: No business associate agreement is offered and the agreement forecloses the question rather than leaving it open. Terms of Service Part III expressly bars the customer from including protected health information, as defined by HIPAA, in any Input to 8am IQ, alongside export controlled material and cardholder data. That prohibition is pointed on this product, because personal injury practice runs on medical records: the platform itself carries native medical treatment tracking, provider management and an Arctrieval integration for medical and billing record retrieval, so the case file is full of exactly the category the AI tool may not touch, and nothing published explains how a user drafting a case note about a client's treatment is to observe the line. No data processing addendum is published on either estate, so there is also no subprocessor annex, no standard contractual clauses package and no signable processor instrument. PCI DSS v4.0.1 compliance and IOLTA trust accounting compliance are claimed, both through the embedded LawPay payment integration rather than the case management platform itself.
Note: Figures and tier contents come from CasePeer's pricing page, including the comparison matrix of about seventy rows and the seven question pricing FAQ. They match the page for machine readers at casepeer.com/llm-info, last updated 25 June 2026, which shows the same three tiers. Commercial terms come from the 8am Terms of Service, updated August 2026, which CasePeer's footer adopts and which names 8am CasePeer expressly. The entry price is $79, the Basic rate, per user per month in US dollars. The pricing page and the agreement conflict twice. The page and FAQ say a firm may cancel at any time, but the agreement says termination takes effect just before the next renewal date, with no refund for a partial period, a downgrade, fewer users or early termination. And the page shows no usage thresholds, while the agreement reserves extra fees for usage above thresholds in the pricing pages or an order form. Prices for electronic signature and data migration are not published.
Legal Signals
What each signal meansA signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.
Client Data in Training
Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?
The published terms prohibit training on customer content. Not a policy page, the agreement.
CasePeer's agreement bans training on customer content in complete terms. Terms of Service Part III says 8am does not use Customer Content or IQ Content to train or fine tune any large language model or other generative AI model, built by 8am or a third party, and that the content of inputs and outputs is never used to update model weights or otherwise added to any AI model's training data. It binds the model layer too: the models behind 8am IQ may keep content for up to thirty days and will not train on it.
Part I grants 8am a perpetual, irrevocable license over aggregated, anonymized Customer Content, excluding personal information, for internal use to improve and develop the platform; that clause does not name training or machine learning, and Part III controls where they conflict and excludes training. 8am may use inputs, outputs and usage data to monitor and improve 8am IQ through aggregated human and automated review, so a person may read a prompt even though no model trains on it. The customer may not use IQ Content to train any system of its own.
Prompt and Output Retention
How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?
A specific retention period is published and the customer cannot change it.
A fixed window for prompts and outputs applies at the model layer under the agreement. Terms of Service Part III says the large language models behind 8am IQ may keep IQ Content for up to thirty days, and will not use it to train any model. That is a specific, contractual answer about the model provider, not only about 8am. The agreement adds that 8am stores IQ Content under its privacy policy and keeps it as needed to comply with law, provide the services, enforce the agreement or spot misuse.
The thirty day window covers the model layer only. No period is published for case content generally: CasePeer's page for machine readers points to a Data Retention policy whose period is not stated, saying only that data is deleted or deidentified after the retention period when a customer leaves. The agreement says a user's 8am IQ Case Assistant chat history cannot be deleted, but Case Assistant is part of 8am MyCase Advanced, not CasePeer.
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?
The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.
Setting up and maintaining the in product permission model falls to the firm. Permission groups and detailed user permissions appear on the pricing matrix as administration features on all tiers. The page for machine readers adds role based access, two factor authentication for all users, and user roles, permissions and audit logging. The agreement requires a unique login for each user, bans credential sharing, and lets the administrator assign and change access.
Nothing suggests the product inherits another document system's access rules, so getting permissions right falls to the firm's administrator. Nothing describes separation between matters within a firm, or a conflicts or ethical wall feature, on a platform holding a contingency practice's whole case file. The permission model does not reach 8am IQ: the assistant is on or off for every user, set once by the Account Owner, with no way to limit it by role, though intake specialists and case managers use the platform.
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?
Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.
Terms of Service Part I lets either party disclose the other's confidential information as required by law or by order of a court, regulator or government body. The receiving party must then give prompt notice, as far as the law allows, so the other party can seek a protective order or other remedy. The commitment sits in a mutual confidentiality clause about confidential information, not a clause on customer case data, and the agreement says the privacy policy governs personal information and overrides that clause where they conflict, so protection for client data may be narrower than the clause alone suggests.
If 8am must answer a subpoena, court order or other compulsory process about the customer's account, the customer must, on request, pay for 8am's staff time at a rate 8am sets and cover related costs. No transparency report, schedule or aggregate figure is published.
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?
No located public material identifies the corpus behind the product’s answers.
No source corpus sits behind the AI, which does not answer from a body of law. The 8am IQ Writing Assistant works on text the user has already written in a note, task or message, fixing grammar, simplifying, adjusting tone and translating between English, Spanish and Arabic. There is no legal corpus to trace, and 8am is not holding one back. What is unaddressed is what the models were trained on. The agreement says 8am IQ runs on large language models and says nothing about their training data, and no model or provider is named.
The integration catalog names EvenUp, Novo and Practice AI as partners that produce demand letters and case summaries, but their sources are theirs to disclose.
Good Law Verification
Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?
No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.
8am IQ cites no authority. It rewrites and translates the user's own notes, tasks and text messages, and states nothing about the law that a lawyer would need to check. CasePeer's AI page says every response points back to its source so the user can check it before it goes out, which concerns where a rewrite came from, not whether a case is still good law. A firm that needs to confirm a case is current does that elsewhere, and CasePeer does not suggest otherwise.
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?
No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.
CasePeer's AI feature page with its eleven question FAQ, the pricing matrix, the page for machine readers, the tool terms and the IQ Usage Policy say nothing about what 8am IQ does when it cannot produce a usable answer: none says the assistant declines a request, flags low confidence, shows uncertainty in a suggested rewrite, or asks the user to clarify. The agreement says 8am IQ may produce errors, omissions or inaccuracies, disclaims any warranty of accuracy, completeness or reliability, and puts the whole burden of checking on the user.
The IQ Usage Policy says all outputs should be reviewed and sources checked. Nothing says whether a translation the model is unsure of is marked before it reaches a client who reads only that language.
Fabricated Citation Record
Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?
No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.
The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, coverage of it, and reporting on the growing body of sanctions decisions record no case naming CasePeer, 8am IQ or 8am. This covers fabricated citations only, so it is not a litigation history, and other proceedings involving 8am would not appear here. 8am IQ produces no legal authority; it only rewrites and translates text the user has written. Its version of this failure would be a mistranslated or distorted client message, which no tracker records and which would surface, if at all, as a malpractice or fee dispute rather than a sanctions order.
Bar Guidance Alignment
Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?
Public materials refer to professional responsibility in general terms without naming guidance.
The IQ Usage Policy bars practicing law without authorization or giving tailored legal advice without a qualified person reviewing it. It says the models are not tuned to give legal advice and should not be the only source of it, and that all outputs should be reviewed and sources checked. The Terms of Service require customers to follow the professional conduct rules of their profession, and say 8am does not give legal advice or practice law.
No bar opinion is cited, including ABA Formal Opinion 512, no state guidance on generative AI is referenced, and nothing maps any feature to a conduct rule, though the assistant drafts and translates messages that go straight to clients.
Billing and Fee Posture
Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?
Public materials claim time savings without addressing billing or disclosure, and the product sits inside a fee relationship between a lawyer and a client where those savings would change the bill.
The writing assistant saves time and cuts costs, the AI page says, backed by an industry survey rather than product data: 38 percent of legal professionals save one to five hours a week with AI. Plaintiff firms work on contingency, so faster drafting does not shrink a client's bill as it would in an hourly practice, and the firm keeps the saving. The platform sits inside the fee relationship and handles the money end of it: it publishes settlement calculation, settlement distribution, case expense tracking, client trust tracking and fee change management, and processes payments through LawPay, so the client's net recovery is calculated here.
Nothing says whether AI work is recorded, disclosed to the client, or reflected in how fees or costs are charged, and no record of AI use for each matter is described.
Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?
No located public material supports a client side disclosure obligation.
CasePeer publishes no subprocessor list for the platform or the AI, names no model provider, and publishes no data processing addendum, security exhibit or client facing pack. The agreement says only that 8am IQ runs on large language models, so which third party processes client data through the assistant is not stated. What 8am offers on request through its trust center is a SOC 2 report, PCI attestations, a security questionnaire and a certificate of insurance, which are security documents rather than a subprocessor and model provider disclosure. Plaintiff contingency firms rarely receive outside counsel guidelines from corporate clients.
Court Disclosure Support
If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?
No located public material addresses court disclosure or verification certification.
The product offers no way to disclose AI involvement. 8am IQ works on internal notes, tasks and text messages to clients and does not draft filings, so court certification rules do not normally reach its output. Nothing marks which passages a machine wrote, records that the assistant was used on an item, or names the model, and no disclosure template, certification or export is published. The platform's audit logging and case timelines show who did what and when, but they are an activity trail, not a record of AI involvement, and CasePeer does not claim otherwise.
A note or client message the assistant rewrote can become evidence in a fee dispute or bad faith claim, and nothing published would show later which words were the firm's own.