D
Docketwise

Docketwise is immigration case management software from 8am for immigration law firms, nonprofits and other legal service providers, built around a forms library rather than a case file. A single multilingual questionnaire, sent by email or text, collects a client's details once and fills every matching form in the USCIS, EOIR, DOL and DOS libraries. The vendor updates those forms as agencies revise them. Around the library sit document requests, eSignature, deadline and priority date tracking, automatic USCIS case status updates, a client portal, invoicing, trust accounting and electronic filing with USCIS.

A CRM captures leads from the firm's website, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp and SMS. The AI, DocketWise IQ, comes with the Pro and Advanced plans. Its Document Assistant reads scanned passports and green cards into forms and client profiles, and its Writing Assistant edits client messages and translates them for clients who speak Spanish or Arabic. Docketwise connects to Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, QuickBooks, LawPay, common storage, email and calendar tools and Zapier, and publishes an open API. Founded in 2016 and based in Austin, Texas, it is owned by 8am, formerly AffiniPay.

Compared with

Docketwise, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

DocketWise IQ is a core feature layered on a practice system that works without it. The company was founded in 2016 around its forms library, which fills USCIS, EOIR, DOL and DOS forms from one multilingual questionnaire. Case management, deadline and priority date tracking, USCIS status updates, eSignature, invoicing and trust accounting sit around it. The Basic plan, at $80 per user per month on annual billing, carries no AI and still runs an immigration practice, while DocketWise IQ comes with Pro and Advanced.

The AI adds two assistants. The Document Assistant reads scanned passports and green cards and maps names, dates and other details into forms and client profiles. The Writing Assistant edits client messages and translates them into Spanish or Arabic. 8am launched further IQ capabilities across its products in June 2026, and Docketwise lists AI for immigration firms among its five product areas, beside forms, case management, CRM and reporting.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureAccuracy is asserted without measurement, or grounding is claimed while output cites sources the reader cannot open and verify.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

Docketwise says automatic form filling brings measurable accuracy and time savings, that the Document Assistant reduces manual entry and improves accuracy, and that the platform minimizes filing errors, which it calls the leading source of error in immigration practice. No figure, error rate, sample, test set or evaluation is published, and no failure mode is named. Extraction runs on the customer's own uploaded identity documents and fills named agency forms rather than generating free text.

Nothing describes how a mapped value is traced back to the page it came from or whether the source is shown to the reviewer. The product cites no legal authority, so citator checks and linked primary sources do not apply. The 8am group publishes a Case Assistant that returns answers with citations traced to their source, but its own availability table places it in MyCase rather than DocketWise.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside a supervising lawyer, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

Under 8am's January 2026 AI principles the AI does not hit send: it offers recommendations that the user reviews, edits and approves before anything happens. 8am's AI page adds that the firm decides when AI is used and who can use it, and that nothing runs in the background. The 8am Terms of Service say output may not replace professional judgment or human review. The workflow is attorney driven, from questionnaire to populated form to signed filing, with Reverse Autofill and shared questionnaire editing as review points.

An extracted value carries no confidence indicator and no marker showing that the AI filled it. Nothing describes what happens when a scan is illegible or a field cannot be matched. On a government form signed under penalty of perjury, a wrong alien registration number looks the same as a right one.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

Five customer firms appear by logo, among them Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt, Davis & Associates, Rushton Hoffmann & Associates and Fogle Law Firm. Three testimonials carry a named attorney, title and firm, from Saja Raoof of Saja Raoof, Inc. Law Corporation, Shahzad Khan of Shahzad R. Khan Legal and Anna Ernest of Ernest Law Group. Published success stories include Jane Lee's move from LawLogix after ten years, Immigrant Justice Corps on nonprofit use, and Ismail Mohammed, a sole practitioner who reports cutting case preparation time by 50%.

Docketwise's headline claim is that firms spend 75% less time on admin, with no method or sample given. Law360 reported that the AILA Marketplace Study 2022 ranked Docketwise the most used immigration case management software.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureSubstantive published commitments on confidentiality and training use, short of the full picture: commonly silence on segregation between users or matters, or on what the underlying model provider may retain.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

Customer content and AI inputs and outputs may not be used to train or fine tune any model, 8am's or a third party's, under the 8am Terms of Service, which name 8am DocketWise. They limit the models behind DocketWise IQ to keeping that content for up to 30 days without training on it. 8am's AI page says the AI reaches only data a user already has rights to view, and that the safeguards keeping one customer's data from another extend to the AI.

Data is encrypted at rest and in transit, administrators set role based access, and two factor authentication comes with every plan. The terms reserve aggregated human and automated review of inputs and outputs to monitor accuracy, so a person may read a prompt that no model trains on. Nothing addresses privilege or work product directly, and access separates by user and office rather than by matter.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA boilerplate disclaimer sits in the terms while the marketing describes the product in advice terms, or the intended audience is left ambiguous.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

Both the 8am Terms of Service and the 8am IQ Usage Policy name DocketWise or DocketWise IQ. Both say the platform serves legal, accounting and other client based professionals in the United States and Canada. They say 8am gives no legal advice and does not practice law, and that customers must follow their own professional conduct rules. Unauthorized practice of law is prohibited, and output may not replace professional judgment or human review.

Docketwise sells to attorneys and also to legal service providers and nonprofits, in the one field in the United States where accredited representatives who are not lawyers may lawfully practice before the agency. The terms do not say whether a DOJ accredited representative falls inside their audience, or what such a representative may do with the drafting tool.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible AI principles are published without a mechanism, a testing regime, or anything a buyer could audit.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

8am's January 2026 statement of AI principles, written by its principal product manager for AI, covers 8am IQ, which includes DocketWise IQ. It commits to AI that assists rather than decides, to fair, transparent and explainable output, and to continuous evaluation. 8am says it uses proprietary evaluation metrics to monitor accuracy and detect errors, with prompts preconfigured for specific legal tasks. The metrics and their results are not published, and no owner is named for AI decisions or for what is tested before a release.

The Document Assistant reads passports and green cards issued in many formats, scripts and transliterations, and nothing is published on how its accuracy varies across document types, issuing countries or scripts other than Latin.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipSubstantive published policy covering most of the ground, short of the full set: commonly no named subprocessor list or no stated incident practice.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

Administrators set role based permissions at user level, Advanced adds permission groups and multiple admin roles, and two factor authentication is available on every plan. Inside the vendor, access to customer data is limited to employees who need it, and staff must use single sign on or two factor authentication for systems holding sensitive data. Data is encrypted with AES 256 at rest and over HTTPS in transit, on AWS across several availability zones, with encrypted snapshot backups about every five minutes.

Annual third party penetration tests with remediation bound by service levels, continuous vulnerability scanning and annual control self assessments are listed. A written incident protocol covers escalation, mitigation and post incident review, customers are told of critical system changes, and customer data is purged from production when a customer leaves. Docketwise also publishes a notice of a data incident. In October 2025 an unauthorized party used valid credentials to copy third party partner repositories, some used in a data migration pipeline that held law firm records.

Personal information of clients of some customer firms, including Social Security and passport numbers, was taken. Notices went to affected individuals from 3 April 2026 with two years of identity monitoring, and the FBI was told. Docketwise says it has added security measures since and is reviewing its policies to prevent a repeat. No subprocessor list is published.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on AI Liability and RecourseLiability is addressed only through a standard limitation clause that disclaims the exposure the product creates.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

The 8am Terms of Service, updated August 2026 and naming 8am DocketWise, exclude indirect and consequential damages. They cap 8am's total liability at the net fees it earned from the customer in the three months before the event giving rise to the claim. For the AI, 8am gives no warranty on the accuracy, completeness or reliability of output, says it is not obliged to verify output, and disclaims liability for errors in output or for reliance on it.

The customer indemnifies 8am against third party claims connected with its use of the services, and no indemnity or warranty runs the other way. Document Assistant output goes onto forms filed with federal agencies, so an incorrect alien registration number or date of entry on a submitted form is a loss these terms leave with the firm.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

Connections cover Clio, MyCase and PracticePanther for practice management, QuickBooks for accounting, Dropbox and OneDrive for storage, and Gmail, Outlook and Google Calendar for email and calendar. Payments run natively through 8am LawPay, Zapier opens a route to thousands of other applications, and the product is listed on the Google Workspace Marketplace. Clio and PracticePanther compete with 8am's own MyCase, and Docketwise presents those connections as serving firms that run both.

An open API is published, and Gmail and Outlook appear as add ons in the plan comparison. No page sets out which objects sync, in which direction, what authentication is required or what a firm must configure.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud delivery is implied and neither the tenancy model nor the region is stated.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

Amazon Web Services hosts Docketwise, in data centers with security staff around the clock, biometric scanning and video surveillance. Infrastructure and data are spread across several AWS availability zones for failover and disaster recovery, with encrypted snapshot backups through AWS Elastic Beanstalk about every five minutes. No AWS region or country is named and no residency option is offered. Nothing separates where documents are stored from where the Document Assistant processes them, and no tenancy model or single tenant option is described, for a product that holds identity documents and immigration histories.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

A SOC 2 Type 2 attestation at the level of 8am LLC, the parent, covers Docketwise, and Docketwise's own pages say so, pointing to 8am's public trust center at trust.8am.com. Listed there are the 2025 SOC 2 Type 2 report, a 2026 bridge letter, and PCI DSS v4.0.1 attestations of compliance for the LawPay payment side. Docketwise's own security page describes AWS hosting with AES 256 encryption, continuous third party vulnerability scanning, and SSO or two factor authentication for staff with access to sensitive data.

Annual third party penetration tests and annual control self assessments with documented corrective actions are listed beside them.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe supply chain is partly disclosed: providers named without change notification, or architecture described without the providers.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

OpenAI is named as the AI partner for 8am IQ in 8am's January 2026 statement of AI principles. It says OpenAI does not train on customer data under that agreement and may keep data for up to 30 days for abuse detection. The 8am Terms of Service hold the models behind 8am IQ to the same 30 day limit without naming the provider. The privacy policy says AI inputs also pass to document parsing and optical character recognition providers, none of them named. No model or version is identified, and nothing commits to notice if the provider changes.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Commercial TransparencyA buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, and what implementation adds.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

Docketwise publishes per user monthly rates in both billing cadences. Basic is $80, Pro $100 and Advanced $120 on annual billing, and $90, $120 and $140 billed monthly. The unit is a seat per user with unlimited cases. Plan contents appear in three plan cards and in a comparison table of about forty rows covering case management, forms, CRM, DocketWise IQ and administration. The table shows the AI in Pro and above, and where eFiling, eSignature and permission groups sit.

The terms around the price are published too, with a seven day free trial, no setup fees for standard accounts and free data migration on annual Advanced plans. Advanced can be started through a free trial signup, with a demo route beside it. There is no unpriced enterprise tier, and the one variable cost, LawPay transaction processing, is disclosed with fees waived for new subscribers.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Firm and Practice CoverageWho the product serves is documented precisely: firm segments, in house and government use, and the practice areas actually supported, with the limits stated.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

Docketwise declares immigration law its only practice area and builds its positioning on that boundary, saying its data model, workflows and forms library are built around immigration practice rather than general practice. It lists solo attorneys, boutique firms, larger immigration teams, and legal aid and nonprofit immigration organizations, with roles for attorneys, paralegals, support staff, firm administrators and consultants.

Coverage is defined at the level a practitioner checks, with the forms library set out by agency across USCIS, EOIR, DOL and DOS and the electronic filing subset named form by form. Firms wanting general practice management are pointed to Clio or MyCase alongside, through published integrations. Six common use cases are published, from multilingual intake for solo practices to nonprofit caseloads.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

6 public documents

The public pages on file for Docketwise, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

From $80 per user per month, billed annually

USD, as published, never converted
  • Docketwise publishes its prices in full and charges per user per month, with unlimited cases on every plan.
  • Basic is $80 per user per month on an annual plan, or $90 monthly. It covers the immigration forms library with automatic form filling, case management, multilingual intake questionnaires, priority date and case tracking, the client portal, document requests, calendaring, time tracking and unlimited storage. It has no AI.
  • Pro is $100 annually or $120 monthly and includes the AI. DocketWise IQ brings the Document Assistant, which reads scanned passports and green cards into your forms, and the Writing Assistant. Pro also adds electronic filing with USCIS, electronic signatures, CRM and lead management, text and bulk messaging, custom attributes, an HR portal and QuickBooks.
  • Advanced is $120 annually or $140 monthly and adds multiple branches, permission groups, multiple admins, priority support, tailored setup, a 5GB file size limit and free data migration on the annual plan.
  • There is a seven day free trial, no setup fees on standard accounts, and LawPay transaction fees are waived for new subscribers.

Per user subscription pricing is published in full, with both cadences, plan contents and a feature comparison. Basic is $80 per user per month billed annually or $90 monthly. It covers forms, case management, multilingual intakes, case and priority date tracking, the client portal, document requests, calendaring, time tracking, storage, invoicing, trust accounting, LawPay, workflows, chat, reporting and two factor authentication.

Pro is $100 annually or $120 monthly and adds eFiling, eSignatures, a human resources portal, CRM and lead management, custom attributes, text and bulk messaging, QuickBooks and DocketWise IQ. Advanced is $120 annually or $140 monthly and adds multiple branches, permission groups, multiple admins, priority support, tailored setup, free data migration on the annual plan and a 5GB file size limit. A seven day free trial, no setup fees for standard accounts and waived LawPay transaction fees for new subscribers are published, and there is no unpriced enterprise tier.

Confidentiality and data terms: No Business Associate Agreement is offered or mentioned. Docketwise holds immigration records rather than protected health information and makes no HIPAA claim, though immigration files can carry medical records such as the Form I-693 report of medical examination and vaccination record. Its notice of the October 2025 data incident lists medical condition or treatment information among the data involved.

Note: Both billing cadences are published on the pricing page, with a full feature comparison table. The entry price is the Basic annual rate of $80 per user per month, a real purchasable entry point; there is no free plan, only a seven day trial. The display carries the annual qualifier because the monthly Basic rate is $90.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Never, in the contract

The published terms prohibit training on customer content. Not a policy page, the agreement.

Part III of the 8am Terms of Service says 8am does not use customer content or AI inputs and outputs to train or fine tune any large language model or other generative model. The rule covers 8am's own models and third party models. The models that deliver the AI may keep content for up to 30 days and may not train on it, and the terms name 8am DocketWise as a covered product. Part I grants 8am a perpetual license over aggregated and anonymized customer content, excluding personal information, to improve the platform, and the terms reserve aggregated human and automated review of inputs and outputs. 8am's AI page says inputs and outputs may be used to develop and improve its products, while the agreement rules out training.

Source: Vendor PublishedWe do not use Customer Content or IQ Content to trainAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Disclosed fixed window

A specific retention period is published and the customer cannot change it.

The large language models behind 8am IQ may keep inputs and outputs for up to 30 days under Part III of the 8am Terms of Service, and may not train on that content. 8am's AI principles name the provider as OpenAI and the purpose as abuse detection. 8am itself stores that content under its privacy policy, keeping it as needed to comply with law, provide the services, enforce the agreement or identify misuse. No period is published for case content generally, and on departure the terms let 8am keep account data under its privacy policy or a data management policy whose period is not stated.

Source: Vendor Publishedmay retain IQ Content for up to thirty (30) daysAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Own model, documented

The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.

Role based permissions are set by administrators at user level on every plan. Advanced adds permission groups, multiple account admins and multiple branches, so a firm with more than one office can separate them. 8am's AI page says the platform enforces user permissions so the AI reaches only data a user already has rights to view. Inside the vendor, production access is limited to employees who need it. The firm configures the permission model itself, and no default configuration is published.

Nothing separates access at matter level, so screening one person from one client's file inside an office has no published mechanism.

Source: Vendor PublishedDocketWise admins can configure permissions at the user levelAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Notice committed

Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.

Part I of the 8am Terms of Service lets either party disclose the other's confidential information when a law, court, regulator or other government body requires it. The receiving party must give prompt notice where the law allows, so the other can seek a protective order. The terms name 8am DocketWise as a covered product, and no transparency report is published. The commitment sits in a mutual confidentiality clause, and the agreement says the privacy policy governs personal information and prevails in a conflict.

When 8am must answer a subpoena or other compulsory process about an account, the customer pays on request for the staff time it takes.

Source: Vendor Publishedwill provide prompt notice to the disclosing partyAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Sources named, basis unstated

Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.

The forms library is defined by issuing agency across USCIS, EOIR, DOL and DOS, and Docketwise calls it the core of the product, maintained as agencies revise forms. Forms are filled from the customer's own client record and from the identity documents the Document Assistant reads. These are United States government forms, and nothing published addresses licensing or gives an update schedule, version history or review date for any form. Nothing identifies the data behind the AI models themselves.

Source: Vendor Publishedthe core product, maintained for accuracy as forms changeAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

Docketwise cites no cases, statutes or regulations. It fills agency forms from a client record, tracks deadlines and priority dates, and pulls case status from USCIS, so its output carries no legal proposition to check for later treatment. The nearer currency question is the form edition, since agencies reject filings made on superseded versions. Docketwise commits to maintaining the library as forms change but publishes no update cadence, version indicator or review date.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.

The Document Assistant reads scanned passports and green cards, extracts names, dates and other key details, and maps them into USCIS forms and client profiles. Nothing describes what it does when it cannot read or map a value with confidence, whether by a flag, a blank field, a highlight or a confidence rating, and no evaluation is published. Behavior on a poor scan, an unfamiliar document format, a script other than Latin or a field missing from the source is not described.

A plausible but wrong alien registration number in a filled field looks the same as a correct one on a form filed under penalty of perjury.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases database, which tracks court decisions worldwide on hallucinated AI content, lists no matter naming Docketwise, 8am or AffiniPay. Docketwise produces no citations to legal authority; its output is client data entered on government forms.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Mapped by jurisdiction

The vendor publishes a mapping of its product to named ethics opinions across more than one jurisdiction.

An 8am post of 9 February 2026 on choosing ethical AI takes Texas Opinion 705 and Oregon Formal Opinion 2024-205 topic by topic. It sets 8am IQ's commitments on data security, model training, confidentiality, review of output and technical competence against each opinion and quotes both. The 8am IQ Usage Policy, which names DocketWise IQ, prohibits unauthorized practice of law and tailored legal advice without review by a licensed professional.

The terms require use in line with professional conduct rules. The mapped opinions address lawyers, while Docketwise also sells to legal service providers and nonprofits whose accredited representatives practice immigration law without being lawyers, and nothing published addresses their use of the AI.

Source: Vendor PublishedBar associations across the country have issued ethics opinionsAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Savings claims only

Public materials claim time savings without addressing billing or disclosure, and the product sits inside a fee relationship between a lawyer and a client where those savings would change the bill.

Docketwise's savings claims are aimed at firms that bill clients: firms spend 75% less time on admin, manual data entry and filing errors fall, and a sole practitioner reports cutting case preparation by 50%. Docketwise also ships the billing side, with time tracking, invoicing, trust accounting and LawPay payment processing on every plan. Nothing published says whether AI assisted work is marked on a bill, whether a client is told the tool was used, or how a flat fee per petition should change when form preparation takes minutes.

Source: Vendor Publishedhelps firms reduce manual data entry, minimize filing errors, automate drafting, and move cases forward more efficientlyAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Not addressed

No located public material supports a client side disclosure obligation.

8am's public trust center at trust.8am.com lists the 2025 SOC 2 Type 2 report and a 2026 bridge letter, which Docketwise's own pages say cover it. 8am's AI principles name OpenAI as the model provider, and the privacy policy says AI inputs also go to document parsing and optical character recognition providers it does not name. No subprocessor list is published, so a firm cannot give a client the full list of third parties that processed a passport scan.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses court disclosure or verification certification.

Docketwise does not mark which values on a form the Document Assistant extracted and which a person entered, keeps no record of the model used, and captures no human check of an extracted field. It offers no export, certification form or disclosure template for AI involvement, and its eSignature and form review steps are not presented as a record of machine involvement. The output goes to federal agencies on forms signed under penalty of perjury, with a Form G-28 naming the attorney or accredited representative of record.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 462 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 21, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746