G
GenIA-L
GenIA-L is the generative AI legal assistant of the Spanish legal publisher Lefebvre, built to answer only from the publisher's own library rather than the open internet. One chat brings together modules for answering legal questions (Consulta), building arguments from similar judgments (Argumenta), drafting documents from the user's files and Lefebvre sources (Redacta), reviewing contracts, briefs and claims for citation errors, legality and risk (Revisa) and analyzing a document against a chosen article (Analiza).
It adds a deep reasoning mode and twelve guided workflows. Its sources are the Memento commentaries, consolidated state and regional legislation, case law and administrative doctrine, and each answer carries reference notes that open the original document. GenIA-L also runs inside Lefebvre's LexON practice management software. It is licensed per user to lawyers, in house legal departments, advisory firms and public bodies, and its product conditions commit to processing personal data only within the European Union.
GenIA-L launched in September 2023 and is operated by Lefebvre El Derecho, S.A. of Madrid, part of the Lefebvre Group, which sells editions in France and other European countries.
Capability grades
All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.
AI Centrality
How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.
GenIA-L is licensed under its own product conditions, in the version of 10 August 2026, which grant user licenses to the assistant itself rather than to a database. Every module is model work. Consulta answers questions, Argumenta builds arguments from similar judgments, Redacta drafts documents from the user's files and Lefebvre sources, Revisa reviews contracts and briefs for citation errors, legality and risk, and Analiza reviews a document against a chosen article.
A deep reasoning mode and twelve guided workflows chain specialized agents together. The Memento commentaries, legislation and case law it draws on are Lefebvre's own databases, sold separately as products such as QMemento and Neo, where GenIA-L is also embedded. Lefebvre's FAQ names one deliberate exception: the literal text of a legal article is pulled from the database without generative AI.
Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure
Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.
Lefebvre's FAQ says every answer carries several reference notes linked to the fragments of the sources used, and that each note opens the full judgment, statute or administrative decision. It says the text of a cited article is extracted from the database without generative AI, so nothing is paraphrased or left out, and that every source is reviewed by experts before it is indexed. GenIA-L is described as cut off from the internet by design, and a citation agent checks the references in an uploaded document against Lefebvre's consolidated base.
The same FAQ says GenIA-L cannot invent case law or rules and "elimina por completo el riesgo de alucinaciones", while clause 3.6 of the product conditions says Lefebvre does not guarantee that results are fully reliable or infallible. No accuracy figure, test set or error rate is published.
Autonomy and Oversight Model
What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.
Clause 3.6 of the product conditions says Lefebvre does not guarantee that a result can be used as it stands or serve as legal advice, and recommends human supervision of every result. The security page says the assistant operates under expert supervision, and a blog post of 24 September 2026 says human supervision must be mandatory. Reference notes open each source, the citation agent labels each reference as in force, amended, repealed or under appeal, and in the guided workflows the user selects a strategy before GenIA-L drafts, as in the workflow for answering a claim.
Supervision is recommended rather than required, the workflows are described as automatic flows without saying which steps run unattended, and nothing says what happens after an answer is found to be wrong.
Operational and Outcome Evidence
Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.
The real cases page quotes six named users: the legal department of Línea Directa Aseguradora on resolving legal questions quickly from reliable sources, a law firm on faster research, and the advisory and management firms MADOM Management, DMR Gestión, GM Integra and Acountax. None of the quotes carries a person's name, a date or a figure. The same page claims 50,000 users in Europe, an average of more than five hours saved a week and more than 68 percent of users praising ease of use, speed and security, with no survey or period stated.
Counts disagree across pages: the product home page says more than 30,000 customers work with GenIA-L, and the group's own page says more than 75,000. A post of 25 November 2025 says it answers more than a million queries a month, and Lefebvre agreed preferential terms for members of the Barcelona Bar on 14 November 2025.
Privilege and Confidentiality Posture
How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.
Clause 3.7 of the GenIA-L product conditions guarantees that information the customer enters is not shared with external databases and does not serve GenIA-L's own training, and that it stays hosted only on Lefebvre's systems while the customer uses the product. Clause 2.3 says the conversation history serves no other purpose, is never used for third parties' requests or for training, and can be deleted by the customer at any time.
Clause 13 of Lefebvre's general conditions holds every document and item of information received from the customer in the strictest confidence, binds employees and maintenance staff, and bars disclosure without written authorization. Lefebvre's FAQ says uploaded files are deleted as soon as the answer is produced. No agreement mentions professional secrecy or privilege. Nothing describes separation between users or matters when conversations are shared with a team, or what an underlying model provider receives or keeps.
UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture
Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.
Clause 3.6 of the product conditions says Lefebvre does not guarantee that a result can be used as it stands or serve as legal advice, and recommends human supervision. The general conditions are commercial in nature and license digital products for use in Spain only under clause 5.2, and Lefebvre's FAQ says the product is designed for professional use in the legal field. A blog post of 1 October 2026 says the lawyer must validate the text under their own ethical judgment and that filing invented judgments or repealed articles breaches the code of conduct.
Advisory and management firms and companies receive the same drafting and review tools, and nothing addresses who may give legal advice with them. Supervision is recommended rather than required.
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.
The GenIA-L security page links Lefebvre El Derecho's ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certificate, number 012/25 from IMQ Ibérica, first issued in July 2025 and valid to July 2028. Its scope covers the design, development and deployment of AI driven solutions for internal processes and for the products the company offers. Lefebvre announced on 4 June 2025 that it was the first legal sector company certified to the standard and tied the certification to GenIA-L's principles.
Clause 4.4 of the product conditions says Lefebvre carried out a data protection impact assessment for the GenIA-L processing, and the security page cites its ethics charter and responsible contracting charter. No accountable executive or committee for the AI is named, no evaluation results or release testing are described, and nothing addresses whether answers are weaker in some practice areas, regional laws or languages than in others.
AI Safety and Data Stewardship
Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.
Clause 2.3 of the product conditions keeps the conversation history only for the subscription, lets the customer delete it at any time and deletes it definitively on cancellation. Clause 2.2 requires two step authentication for every licensed user. Lefebvre's FAQ says uploaded files are processed only for the query and deleted immediately, although the launch post of 22 October 2025 says the history saves chats and documents.
As processor, Lefebvre's general conditions commit to breach notice by email within two calendar days with stated contents (clause 12.14), written confidentiality undertakings from staff (12.9), encryption or pseudonymization where appropriate (12.8), and advance notice of any subcontractor with three days to object (12.12). No subprocessor, hosting provider or model provider is named. Clause 12.15 lets Lefebvre keep data after the contract for statutory periods, while clause 2.3 deletes the history on cancellation.
AI Liability and Recourse
What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.
Clause 3.6 of the GenIA-L product conditions says Lefebvre does not guarantee that results are fully reliable or infallible, notes that results vary with the information the customer enters and with the product contracted, and does not guarantee that a result can be used as legal advice. Clause 3.5 disclaims any guarantee that the product meets the customer's expectations or specific needs, which the customer must assess.
Clause 3.3 excludes liability for direct or indirect damage from events outside Lefebvre's control, naming cyberattacks and court or administrative orders among them. Clause 3.1 guarantees only that the content is constantly updated and lets the customer report defects for correction. The general conditions of 6 May 2026, which fill gaps under clause 5.2, repeat the same disclaimers and add no limitation amount, indemnity or insurance. No cap, indemnity or warranty on output is published.
Practice Systems Integration Depth
How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.
Lefebvre's LexON page says GenIA-L is integrated into that practice management software and analyzes documents, identifies relevant information and generates summaries without the user leaving the case file. LexON has its own connection to LexNET, the electronic filing system of the Spanish courts. The how it works page says GenIA-L is also embedded in Lefebvre's Neo and QMemento databases, which is content access rather than a practice system.
Inside GenIA-L, users upload up to ten documents at a time and keep a history that can be filed in folders and shared with a team. No connector for Microsoft Word or Outlook, iManage, NetDocuments or any other practice management software is described, and there is no integration page, API or developer documentation. The LexON page does not say which case file documents GenIA-L can read, whether results are saved back to the file, or whether a separate GenIA-L license is needed.
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.
Clause 3.7 of the product conditions says information the customer enters stays hosted only on Lefebvre's systems while the customer uses GenIA-L, and that personal data used through the assistant is processed within the European Union. The security page says personal data is processed exclusively in the EU with no transfer to jurisdictions with lower protection. Lefebvre's general conditions bar international transfers of the customer's personal data (clause 12.5) while letting Lefebvre place cloud products with a service provider (clause 3.4).
The Esquema Nacional de Seguridad certificate covers the information systems behind the GenIA-L service at medium category. No cloud provider, country or region is named, and nothing separates where model inference runs from where data is stored. The commitment is worded for personal data rather than all client content, and no private or dedicated option is described.
Security Certifications and Trust Center
Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.
The GenIA-L security page links five PDFs. Lefebvre El Derecho's Esquema Nacional de Seguridad certificate, medium category, issued by IMQ Ibérica on 30 June 2026 after an audit on 25 May 2026 and valid to 29 June 2028, lists services on the GenIA-L system within its scope. Its ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate from IMQ, number 1640.2019, was first issued in September 2019, reissued on 2 October 2025 and is valid to 24 September 2028.
It covers the design, development and maintenance of software for legal professionals, public administration and companies under statement of applicability version 7. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 9001:2015 certificates complete the audited set, beside a data protection compliance certificate issued by Lefebvre's own data protection officer. No SOC 2 report, penetration test summary or audit report is published, and the ISO 27001 scope covers the company's software activity rather than GenIA-L by name.
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.
Lefebvre describes specialized agents that collaborate on each task, retrieval only from its curated library with no internet access, extraction of article text without generative AI, a citation agent that checks references against the consolidated base, and a deep reasoning module. A post of 14 January 2026 says new language models adapted specifically to GenIA-L were introduced, and the group's product page says GenIA-L is built on algorithms from the group's own research teams.
A post of 25 November 2025 says OpenAI recognized GenIA-L after it passed 100 billion tokens in just over a year and another 100 billion in under a month, without saying which models serve which feature. No model family, version or inference location is named, no subprocessor list exists, and no commitment to notify customers of a model change is published.
Commercial Transparency
Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.
Clause 2.1 of the GenIA-L product conditions sells a contracted number of licenses equal to the number of users, under a sales order that sets the price. Clause 2.6 gives each user unlimited access within reasonable use, measured against average use over six months, with a right to require changes or end the contract if use is excessive. Lefebvre's general conditions of 6 May 2026 renew subscriptions automatically for twelve month periods unless canceled 30 days ahead (clause 4.1), let the renewal price change with content updates (7.1) and allow deferred payment only above 300 euros (7.3).
No price appears on any Lefebvre page, and every GenIA-L page routes buyers to a demo or contact form. A Galician court order of 7 July 2026 put basic annual plans of the main Spanish publishers' AI tools, GenIA-L among them, at 1,500 to 3,000 euros. That is a court's range across products, not Lefebvre's price.
Firm and Practice Coverage
Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.
The product home page names lawyers, companies, advisory firms and public administration. Lefebvre's FAQ lists litigators, in house legal departments, multidisciplinary advisory firms and independent consultants, and says the product is built for professional use in the legal field. The twelve guided workflows show the practice reach: answering claims, administrative notices, contract clauses, Supreme Court case law, analysis of a procedural filing, preparing a witness examination, comparing collective labor agreements, drafts for out of court negotiation, and tax queries under the regional regimes of the Basque Country and Navarre.
The content is Spanish: state and regional legislation, Spanish case law and administrative doctrine, and the general conditions license digital products for use in Spain. The French edition is sold separately by Lefebvre Dalloz over French content. Coverage depth by practice area, which Memento titles a subscription includes, and the firm sizes and tasks the product does not suit are not stated.
6 public documents
The public pages on file for GenIA-L, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.
-
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice, Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Read Oct 2, 2026
-
lefebvre.es/condiciones/genial2 signals
Client Data in Training, Prompt and Output Retention
Read Oct 2, 2026
-
lefebvre.es/genia-l/faqs2 signals
Primary Law Corpus Provenance, Good Law Verification
Read Oct 2, 2026
-
Bar Guidance Alignment
Read Oct 2, 2026
-
Billing and Fee Posture
Read Oct 2, 2026
-
Fabricated Citation Record
Read Oct 2, 2026
No published figureEUR, as published, never converted
- GenIA-L is sold as one license for each person who uses it.
- Each user can use it as much as they need, within normal use.
- Subscriptions renew every year unless you cancel 30 days before.
- No price is posted, so you ask Lefebvre for a demo or a quote.
Clause 2.1 of the GenIA-L product conditions (version of 10 August 2026) sells a contracted number of licenses equal to the number of users, priced in the sales order. Use is unlimited within reasonable use, measured against average use over six months (clause 2.6). Lefebvre's general conditions (6 May 2026) renew subscriptions automatically for twelve month periods unless canceled 30 days ahead, allow the renewal price to change with content updates, and offer deferred payment only above 300 euros. No rate, tier or minimum is published, and buyers request a demo or contact sales.
Implementation: No implementation, setup or training fee is mentioned on any Lefebvre page.
Confidentiality and data terms: Not applicable in the Spanish market. The general conditions carry processor terms under Article 28 GDPR (clause 12), and the GenIA-L product conditions add processing terms specific to the product (clause 4).
Note: No figure is published on any Lefebvre page. The price is set in the sales order, which prevails over the product and general conditions. An order of the High Court of Justice of Galicia of 7 July 2026 put basic annual plans of the main Spanish publishers' AI tools, GenIA-L among them, at 1,500 to 3,000 euros. That is a court's range across several products, not Lefebvre's published price.
Legal Signals
What each signal meansA signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.
Client Data in Training
Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?
The published terms prohibit training on customer content. Not a policy page, the agreement.
Clause 3.7 of the GenIA-L product conditions, in the version of 10 August 2026, guarantees that information the customer enters is not shared with external databases and does not serve GenIA-L's own training, and clause 2.3 says the stored conversation history is not used to train GenIA-L. The commitment is worded for GenIA-L's own training; nothing addresses what an underlying model provider may do with the data.
Prompt and Output Retention
How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?
The customer controls the retention window, by product configuration or by contractual instruction, but zero retention is not stated as available.
Clause 2.3 of the product conditions keeps the conversation history for the subscription, lets the customer delete stored interactions at any time and deletes the history definitively when the subscription is canceled. Lefebvre's FAQ says uploaded files are deleted as soon as the answer is produced. Clause 12.15 of the general conditions lets Lefebvre keep data after the contract for statutory periods, and no zero retention setting or provider retention is described.
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?
No located public material addresses walls or matter level segregation.
Licenses are personal to each user with two step authentication, and the conversation history can be shared with a team. Nothing on the product, security or FAQ pages, in the GenIA-L product conditions, the general conditions or the launch post of 22 October 2025 describes who can see shared conversations or how matters or teams are kept apart.
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?
Published terms or policy address disclosure to authorities or in response to legal process, and no commitment or reservation regarding customer notice is located anywhere. The vendor has told the customer that data can leave and has said nothing about whether the customer hears of it.
Clause 11.5 of Lefebvre's general conditions of 6 May 2026 says customer data will be communicated to the competent public administrations in the cases the law provides, with no notice language, and the privacy policy says the same. Clause 12.7, covering data Lefebvre processes for the customer, bars communication to third parties without the customer's express instruction and says nothing about legal demands or notice. No transparency report is published.
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?
Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.
Lefebvre's FAQ names the source material as its legal library: the Memento commentaries, consolidated state and regional legislation, relevant case law and administrative doctrine, with each source reviewed by experts before indexing. The security page says all of GenIA-L's knowledge belongs to Lefebvre and is protected by intellectual property rights. The origin of the legislation and case law, their rights basis and an update cadence beyond constant updating are not stated.
Good Law Verification
Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?
The vendor computes and surfaces subsequent history itself, with the method described.
Lefebvre's FAQ says the citation agent extracts the statutory, case law and doctrinal references in an uploaded text and checks them against Lefebvre's consolidated base to show whether each is in force, amended, repealed or under appeal, suggesting the current citation where needed. How the status of a judgment is determined is not described, and no outside citator is named.
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?
No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.
Nothing on the product, how it works, security or FAQ pages, in the product conditions or in blog posts of 14 January, 12 June and 24 September 2026 describes what GenIA-L does when Lefebvre's library holds no support for an answer. Lefebvre's FAQ says it cannot invent case law or rules.
Fabricated Citation Record
Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?
No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.
One record in the AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin names the product. In an order of 7 July 2026, the Social Chamber of the High Court of Justice of Galicia fined a lawyer 1,800 euros over fabricated citations and set the amount by reference to the annual cost of publishers' AI tools, GenIA-L among them, without identifying the tool the lawyer used or making any finding about GenIA-L's output. No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing citations produced by this product is on the public record.
Bar Guidance Alignment
Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?
Public materials refer to professional responsibility in general terms without naming guidance.
A blog post of 1 October 2026 says filing invented judgments or repealed articles breaches the code of conduct and that the lawyer must validate AI output under their own ethical judgment, and other posts discuss the EU AI Act and professional secrecy. No ethics opinion, article of the Spanish legal profession's code of conduct or statute, or guidance of its General Council is named.
Billing and Fee Posture
Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?
Public materials claim time savings without addressing billing or disclosure, and the product sits inside a fee relationship between a lawyer and a client where those savings would change the bill.
A post of 21 September 2026 presents an impact calculator whose base case saves a lawyer 307 hours a year and, at a reference rate of 100 euros an hour with half the freed time billed, adds 15,350 euros of billing. The real cases page claims more than five hours saved a week. Nothing addresses how AI assisted work is recorded, billed or disclosed to clients.
Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?
The material exists behind a sales conversation or an executed agreement.
No subprocessor or model provider list is published. Lefebvre's general conditions commit to provide the information needed to show compliance on request (clause 12.11) and to give advance notice of any subcontractor with three days to object (clause 12.12). The GenIA-L security page publishes its certificates and offers a security whitepaper that is not published as a document.
Court Disclosure Support
If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?
No located public material addresses court disclosure or verification certification.
GenIA-L drafts filings with links to its sources. Nothing on the product, FAQ or security pages, in the product conditions or in blog posts of 22 October 2025, 24 September 2026 and 1 October 2026 addresses recording or disclosing AI use in a court filing.