I
Iberley IA
Iberley IA is the AI assistant built into Iberley, the Spanish legal information database run by Iberley Información Legal, S.L. of A Coruña. The company shares a business group with the legal publisher Editorial Colex and the practice software company Sudespacho Cloud. The current version, Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía, analyzes and drafts legal queries and documents, with answers grounded in Iberley's collection of current legislation, case law and doctrine together with Colex content.
Every Iberley subscription now includes AI. The basic legal plan allows ten AI queries a day without documents or history. The advanced plan allows unlimited queries, up to ten documents per query, conversation history and Copilot, which runs nine guided workflows such as analyzing a claim or answering an administrative notice. A free seven day demo is offered. Iberley's general conditions commit that client documents are never used to train its own or third party models, that providers do not access their content, and that storage, processing and backups stay inside the European Union. It is sold to lawyers, legal departments and tax, labor and business advisers.
Capability grades
All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.
AI Centrality
How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.
The AI drives the plans Iberley now sells, on top of a legal information database that existed before it and still supplies the content. The subscription page is headed with the statement that all Iberley subscriptions include artificial intelligence, and both plans are named and metered by the AI. The basic legal plan has ten AI queries a day, one question per chat, no documents and no history. The advanced plan has unlimited queries, up to ten documents per query, conversation history and Copilot.
Both run the model the page calls Uxía 5.4. The product page describes Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía as a professional assistant to analyze, draft and support queries and documents, with nine guided workflows, transcription of audio and video, image analysis and diagrams. Behind it sits Iberley's own collection of legislation, case law, doctrine and forms, with content from the Colex publishing house in the same group. A subscriber can read and search that collection without asking the assistant anything. The plans price access to the AI, and the archive they open is the older product.
Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure
Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.
Answers are said to rest on Iberley's sources, and the accuracy figures published are the model provider's, not the product's. The product page says answers are grounded in legal sources of the highest quality, lists current legislation, contrasted case law, specialized doctrine and Colex content, and says responses are founded on Iberley's legal sources. It then gives 33 percent fewer factual errors and 83 percent performance on professional tasks, and states beneath them that these are performance data communicated by OpenAI for GPT 5.4 against earlier versions of the base model.
Those figures measure a general model against its predecessors, not Iberley IA's answers on Spanish law. No evaluation of the product, test set or error rate on legal questions is published. Neither the product page nor the subscription page says how an answer shows the provision or judgment it relies on, or whether a user can open that source from the answer. The general conditions say answers are for general information only and never binding or equivalent to legal advice. A buyer is not told how often the product itself gets the law right.
Autonomy and Oversight Model
What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.
The conditions disclaim the answers, and no review mechanism for the assistant's drafts or workflows is described. Iberley's general conditions say responses to queries are in no case binding and cannot be treated as legal advice. Responses on the site should be used only for general information, not as a substitute for personal evaluation or specific professional advice. The product page says the assistant can analyze, draft and support queries and documents.
The advanced plan adds Copilot, with nine professional workflows that the AI guides step by step, such as analyzing a claim, preparing a reply or handling an administrative notice. Nothing published says where a lawyer reviews a workflow's output, whether a step waits for approval, what the assistant will not do, or what happens after an answer proves wrong. The conditions also forbid queries containing personal data or questions on foreign law.
Those limit what users put in, not what the system puts out. For a product sold to lawyers and legal departments to draft and analyze case documents, the supervision model is a disclaimer, not a described control.
Operational and Outcome Evidence
Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.
No production evidence for Iberley IA is published. The Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía product page, the subscription page, the general conditions, the privacy policy and the legal notice were checked. None names a customer, firm, legal department or adviser using the assistant, and none carries a case study, testimonial or user count. The product page's figures, 33 percent fewer factual errors and 83 percent performance on professional tasks, are attributed on the page itself to OpenAI's published data for GPT 5.4 against earlier versions of the base model.
They describe the underlying model, not any customer's results with Iberley IA. The subscription page describes two plans by audience, lawyers or legal departments and tax, labor or business advisers, which is a market rather than evidence of use. A free seven day demo lets a buyer test the product directly. No deployment, firm of similar size or measured change in research time is published.
Privilege and Confidentiality Posture
How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.
Training, provider access, encryption and location are committed in the general conditions, and privilege and separation inside a firm are not addressed. The conditions say expressly that Iberley does not reuse, analyze, index, exploit or incorporate the client's documents or information into any AI model of its own or of third parties, into internal databases or shared repositories, or into systems for training, improving or tuning AI models.
Where Iberley IA uses technology providers' tools or infrastructure, the conditions guarantee that those providers do not access the content of the client's documents and that their models are not trained or improved with it. All client information is encrypted in transit and at rest, and all storage, processing and backup takes place only inside the European Union. As processor, Iberley treats personal data only on the client's behalf and discloses it only to authorized staff bound by confidentiality.
It deletes the data within six months of the end of the contract or on a request for destruction. The conditions ask users not to put personal data in queries. Professional secrecy, privilege and separation between users or matters are not mentioned.
UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture
Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.
The advice line and a jurisdiction limit are written into the conditions, and the supervision dimension is not. Iberley's general conditions say responses are in no case binding and cannot be treated as legal advice, that they serve general informational purposes only and do not substitute for personal evaluation or specific professional advice, and they forbid queries about foreign law, which keeps the assistant to Spanish law.
The subscription page addresses its plans to lawyers or legal departments and to tax, labor or business advisers, and the product page presents the assistant as a professional tool for analyzing, drafting and supporting queries and documents. The conditions apply to professionals and consumers alike without distinguishing them, and the same conditions govern Iberley's human answered legal query service, so the advice line is written for the whole site rather than for the assistant.
Nothing published explains how a lawyer's duties of competence and supervision apply to the assistant's drafts or workflows, or asks the user to check the authority behind an answer. A consumer who subscribes receives the same tool and the same general disclaimer.
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.
No governance position for the AI is published. For an assistant sold to lawyers, legal departments and advisers to analyze and draft from Spanish law, the questions that matter are who at Iberley is accountable for model behavior, what is tested before a new version such as 5.4 reaches users, and what has been found about uneven output across practice areas. The pages checked were the Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía product page, the subscription page, the general conditions, the privacy policy and the legal notice.
None names an accountable owner, a testing or evaluation regime, an AI policy, a classification under the EU AI Act, or any finding about the assistant's output. The performance figures on the product page are OpenAI's for its base model and say nothing about how Iberley tests its own product. The conditions' commitments on training and provider access protect client data, which is a confidentiality matter, not governance of what the model produces. Nothing published says how a new version is assessed before release or how errors are found and corrected.
AI Safety and Data Stewardship
Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.
Encryption, location, deletion and the processor role are committed in the general conditions, and no AI subprocessor list or incident practice is published. The conditions say all client information is encrypted in transit and at rest, and that all storage, processing and backup takes place only on infrastructure inside the European Union. Technology providers used by Iberley IA do not access the content of client documents.
As processor under the GDPR, Iberley processes personal data only on the client's behalf, limits access to authorized staff under confidentiality, and deletes the data within six months of the end of the contract or on a request for destruction. According to the subscription page, the basic plan keeps no conversation history and the advanced plan does. The privacy policy names the website's processors, among them Google Analytics, HubSpot, Stripe and Cloudflare.
It shares data with the group companies Editorial Colex and Sudespacho Cloud, keeps former clients' data five years for promotional purposes, and says no international transfers are planned. It does not mention Iberley IA. No model or hosting provider, breach notice period or access control description for the AI is published.
AI Liability and Recourse
What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.
Liability is excluded broadly and capped at the amount paid or 100 euros, whichever is higher. Iberley's general conditions say Iberley is not liable for damage arising from use of its services or the inability to use them, including lost projects, business interruption, lost business information or any other financial loss. In no case will its liability for legal queries exceed the amount paid by the user or 100 euros, whichever is greater.
The conditions give no warranty, express or implied, on the products, their performance or fitness for a particular purpose. They say Iberley is wholly separate from the information in its databases because it does not create or control it beforehand, and exclude liability for connectivity problems outside its control. Answers are described as never binding and not legal advice. No indemnity for the customer, warranty on output, insurance or service level for Iberley IA is published on the product page, the subscription page or the conditions.
Under the withdrawal clause, monthly subscriptions are non refundable once started because of prepayments to the AI provider. A wrong answer carried into a filing stays with the lawyer who filed it.
Practice Systems Integration Depth
How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.
No integration of Iberley IA into practice systems is published. The Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía product page, the subscription page, the general conditions, the privacy policy and the legal notice were checked. None describes a Word or Outlook add in, document management connection, practice management integration, API or export route for the assistant. Documents reach it by upload, up to ten per query on the advanced plan, and answers, drafts and diagrams are produced inside Iberley.
The legal notice and privacy policy name Sudespacho Cloud, a practice management software company, as a member of the same business group, but no page read describes a connection to it, what it would move or how a firm would set it up. Copilot's nine workflows run inside the assistant and are not described as reading from or writing to a firm's own systems. A lawyer working from a case management system would carry documents to Iberley and results back by hand. Nothing published lets an implementer plan an integration.
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.
Storage, processing and backup are placed in the European Union by contract, without a provider, country or deployment option. Iberley's general conditions say all storage, processing and backup takes place only on infrastructure inside the European Union, and that client information is encrypted in transit and at rest. Technology providers used by Iberley IA do not access client document content. The privacy policy says no international transfers of data are planned and names Cloudflare among the services used for the website.
Iberley IA is delivered as part of the Iberley web service under a subscription, with the same hosted environment for both plans. Not stated are the cloud or hosting provider, the country or region within the EU, where the model runs as distinct from where documents are stored, and whether a dedicated or private option exists for larger firms or legal departments. The product page cites OpenAI's data for GPT 5.4 without saying which service delivers the model to Iberley or from where; the conditions answer that only at the level of the Union.
Security Certifications and Trust Center
Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.
No independent security attestation is published. Checked the Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía product page, the subscription page, the general conditions, the privacy policy and the legal notice on 2 October 2026: no ISO 27001 certificate, Spanish National Security Scheme certification, SOC 2 report, penetration test, trust center or security page is named for Iberley IA or for Iberley Información Legal, S.L. The general conditions describe encryption of client information in transit and at rest and processing inside the European Union, and the product page describes a secure confidential environment, which are statements about design rather than independent checks.
The privacy policy names a data protection officer and the website's processors, including Cloudflare for security and content delivery, whose certifications, if any, would belong to Cloudflare. No route for a firm or legal department to request security documentation is described on the pages read. A buyer considering the assistant for client documents has no published evidence that anyone outside Iberley has assessed how it is secured.
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.
The base model is identified through the provider's own figures, and the route, hosting and notice of change are not. The product page presents Iberley IA 5.4 Uxía with two performance figures and states that they are data communicated by OpenAI for GPT 5.4 against earlier versions of the base model. The subscription page names the model in both plans as Uxía 5.4, so the product's version follows the OpenAI model it is built on.
The general conditions refer to technology providers whose tools or infrastructure Iberley IA uses. They guarantee that those providers do not access client document content and do not train or improve their models with it, and they place all processing inside the European Union. Not stated are whether the model is reached through OpenAI directly or through a cloud service, which provider and region host it, what other models or embedding services are used, and whether customers are told before the base model changes. No subprocessor list for the AI is published.
Commercial Transparency
Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.
Two plans are named with their AI allowances and features, and no price for either is published. The subscription page sets out the basic legal plan with AI, for occasional use, with ten queries a day, one question per chat, no documents and no history. The legal plan with advanced AI, recommended for intensive professional use, has unlimited daily queries, up to ten documents per query, conversation history and Copilot.
Both are billed monthly, and a seven day demo is offered free without a card. The subscription page, the product page and the general conditions were checked, and no amount in euros for either plan and no price list is published. The general conditions set the commercial terms: prices as shown on the website or order form, adjusted yearly by the consumer price index; monthly prices that may rise with provider costs; annual contracts at a discount; automatic renewal with one month's notice for annual and 15 days for monthly contracts; and no refund of monthly subscriptions once started.
Firm and Practice Coverage
Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.
Two audiences and a jurisdiction are stated, and the practice limits are not. The subscription page addresses its plans to lawyers or legal departments and to tax, labor or business advisers, and Iberley publishes separate AI pages for lawyers and for tax work. The product page grounds answers in Spanish legislation, case law and doctrine from Iberley's own collection and Colex content, and the general conditions forbid queries about foreign law, which states the jurisdiction boundary plainly.
The nine Copilot workflows named on the product page, among them analyzing a claim, preparing a reply and handling an administrative notice, show the litigation and administrative practice the tool is built around. Not stated are the areas of law the collection covers well or poorly, whether regional law of the autonomous communities and lower court decisions are included, how the plans serve a small firm as against a legal department, and whether public bodies are served.
The conditions apply to professionals and consumers alike, so the audience in the terms is wider than the one on the subscription page. A buyer can see who it is for and that it stops at Spanish law.
1 public document
The public pages on file for Iberley IA, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.
-
Client Data in Training, Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
Read Oct 2, 2026
No published figureEUR, as published, never converted
- Iberley IA comes with every Iberley subscription.
- The basic plan gives ten AI questions a day.
- The advanced plan gives unlimited questions and lets you upload documents.
- You can try it free for seven days.
- The price of each plan was not shown on the page.
Structure without a figure. Two plans, billed monthly. Plan Jurídico Básico IA: ten AI queries a day, one question per chat, no documents, no conversation history, no Copilot. Plan Jurídico + IA Avanzada: unlimited daily queries, up to ten documents per query, up to ten questions per chat, conversation history and Copilot. Both use the Uxía 5.4 model and include access to Iberley content. A free seven day demo is offered without a card. No price for either plan was located.
Implementation: None stated.
Confidentiality and data terms: Not applicable in the Spanish market. The general conditions make Iberley the data processor for client data.
Note: The general conditions say prices are those shown on the website or order form, adjusted each year by the consumer price index; monthly prices may rise with provider costs; annual contracts carry a discount; contracts renew automatically unless canceled one month (annual) or 15 days (monthly) before expiry; monthly subscriptions are not refunded once started.
Legal Signals
What each signal meansA signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.
Client Data in Training
Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?
The published terms prohibit training on customer content. Not a policy page, the agreement.
Iberley's general conditions say expressly that Iberley does not reuse, analyze, index, exploit or incorporate client documents or information into any AI model of its own or of third parties, or into systems for training, improving or tuning AI models, and that technology providers used by Iberley IA do not train or improve their models with that information.
Prompt and Output Retention
How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?
The customer controls the retention window, by product configuration or by contractual instruction, but zero retention is not stated as available.
The general conditions say Iberley deletes personal data within six months of the end of the contract or on a request for destruction. The subscription page says the basic plan keeps no conversation history and the advanced plan includes it; no retention period for queries, documents or answers while a subscription runs is stated.
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?
No located public material addresses walls or matter level segregation.
Checked the product page, the subscription page, the general conditions and the privacy policy on 2 October 2026; nothing addresses separation between users, firms or matters in Iberley IA.
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?
Published terms or policy address disclosure to authorities or in response to legal process, and no commitment or reservation regarding customer notice is located anywhere. The vendor has told the customer that data can leave and has said nothing about whether the customer hears of it.
The general conditions say Iberley may retain evidence of the information, registration data and stored content when formally required by a competent authority, and may suspend the service without prior notice on knowledge or notification of unlawful use. No commitment or reservation about telling the client of an authority's request was located, and no transparency report.
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?
Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.
The product page says answers rest on Iberley's own collection and the main legal sources, naming current legislation, contrasted case law, specialized doctrine and content from the group publisher Colex. The origin of the legislation and case law, the rights basis and an update cadence are not stated.
Good Law Verification
Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?
No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.
Checked the product page, the subscription page and the general conditions on 2 October 2026; the product page describes case law as contrasted, and nothing describes a check of whether a cited judgment or provision was later reversed or amended, or an instruction to verify citations.
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?
No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.
Checked the product page, the subscription page and the general conditions on 2 October 2026; nothing describes what the assistant does when Iberley's sources do not support an answer. The conditions let Iberley reject queries it considers excessive or inappropriate, which concerns the query service rather than the assistant's answers.
Fabricated Citation Record
Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?
No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.
Searched the AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin on 2 October 2026 for Iberley and Uxía, and no recorded case was returned. No court order, opinion or disciplinary record naming the product was located. This is a statement about the public record rather than a finding about the product.
Bar Guidance Alignment
Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?
No located public material engages with bar or ethics guidance.
Checked the product page, the subscription page and the general conditions on 2 October 2026; no located material engages with the Spanish legal profession's guidance on AI, the Estatuto General de la Abogacía, the Código Deontológico or professional secrecy.
Billing and Fee Posture
Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?
The product sits inside a lawyer to client fee relationship and no located public material addresses billing, fee or disclosure treatment, with no savings claim published either.
Checked the product page, the subscription page and the general conditions on 2 October 2026; nothing addresses how AI assisted work is recorded, billed or disclosed to clients, and no time saving claim for the product was located.
Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?
No located public material supports a client side disclosure obligation.
Checked the product page, the general conditions and the privacy policy on 2 October 2026. The privacy policy names the website's processors, and no subprocessor or model provider list or client facing disclosure material for Iberley IA was located; the product page refers to OpenAI only for its published model figures.
Court Disclosure Support
If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?
No located public material addresses court disclosure or verification certification.
Checked the product page, the subscription page and the general conditions on 2 October 2026; nothing describes a record of the model, sources and human verification behind a draft for a court filing, or guidance on disclosing AI use to a court.