L
Legisway

Legisway is legal department management software from Wolters Kluwer for corporate legal teams. It keeps contracts, legal entities, claims and litigation, powers of attorney and deeds, privacy and risk, vendors, intellectual property and real estate in one system. Legal ticketing takes requests from the business, and document generation, workflows and eSignature run around it. Legisway Expert AI, included in every package, answers questions about documents and matters, summarizes, rewrites in plain language and compares up to ten contracts in a table, using Azure OpenAI in Sweden.

Its terms bar training on customer input. Legisway Analyzer captures key data from uploaded contracts for a user to validate, and its own terms let Wolters Kluwer train it on customer data weekly. Legisway Advisor, launched in February 2026 and also sold on its own, reviews contracts in Word against the customer's playbooks. Data is hosted on AWS in Germany with backups in Ireland. Legisway began as a French startup that Wolters Kluwer acquired in 2019, and Wolters Kluwer says more than 900 legal departments and 130,000 users in Europe use it. Legisway Meetings, launched in Germany in 2026, adds board meeting management. UK packages start at €8,000 a year.

Compared with

Legisway, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

Legisway is a legal department system of record, and AI powers its contract work. Expert AI, a generative feature included in every package, answers questions on a document and summarizes provisions, obligations, risks and deadlines. It also rewrites legal language in plain terms and builds a comparison table across up to ten contracts. Schedule 3 limits Core to a single document and adds multiple documents and saved conversation history in Advanced, and Advanced and Premium can query every document in a matter at once.

Analyzer, which Schedule 3 calls a generic question answering model, captures title, contract type, language, parties, key dates and applicable law in advance for a user to validate. A Mass Import and Contract Audit option runs it across up to 10,000 contracts. Advisor, launched in February 2026, reviews a contract in Word against a chosen playbook and redrafts clauses one by one. The entity, claims, power of attorney, privacy, real estate, ticketing, workflow and document generation modules run without AI.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureAccuracy is asserted without measurement, or grounding is claimed while output cites sources the reader cannot open and verify.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

Accuracy goes unmeasured across Expert AI, Analyzer and Advisor, with no error rate or evaluation. The Legisway AI page says answers are grounded in the customer's contracts, matters, entities and legal records. A September 2025 Wolters Kluwer article describes human review with citations, versioning and full auditability, while the product pages do not show how an Expert AI answer points back to its source passage. The Expert AI Supplemental Terms, valid from January 2026, say output may be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading and that Wolters Kluwer does not verify its accuracy or truth.

Schedule 3 leaves it to the user to validate or correct the data points Analyzer captures, and Advisor's suggestions are described as explainable.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system runs alone, what constrains it, and how a lawyer checks it are all published: modes, thresholds, review surfaces, and the route a matter takes back to human judgment. A categorical limit on a named mode or tier, stating what its output may not be used for, meets the threshold limb without a number.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

Each AI component carries a stated control. Expert AI answers questions users ask on a document and produces summaries on demand. Its terms open it to Editor and Contributor profiles, and the access guide also lists administrators. The Expert AI Supplemental Terms state that output is not legal advice and require the customer to verify it, including by human review. They bar automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals without adequate human review.

Schedule 3 says the user validates or corrects the data points Analyzer captures, and only administrators and editors can create a contract record with AI. Advisor shows changes in a redline view, applies edits as native redlines in Word and lets the user modify each suggestion. A daily fair use limit applied during the free trial, and the current terms keep a fair use and monitoring clause. A September 2025 Wolters Kluwer article describes proactive AI agents that would monitor renewals, as a plan rather than a shipped feature.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

Named users are quoted without figures. Kim Philips, paralegal and lease lead at Interstate Waste Services, describes reaching the platform from anywhere, and the full Interstate Waste Services story sits behind a form. Maria Knutson, legal and contract affairs manager at Ergotron, describes how it handles contract volume and onboarding. Country pages show logos including Decathlon, Hochtief, Renault, Evonik, JCDecaux, Safran, DHL eCommerce and Jack Wolfskin.

Wolters Kluwer says more than 900 legal departments and 130,000 users across Europe use Legisway, and its United States page says more than 1,000 corporate legal teams worldwide. Its 2025 benchmark of more than 700 legal departments found 42 percent using contract management software, up from 33 percent. No outcome figure is attributed to a customer or to the AI features.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureSubstantive published commitments on confidentiality and training use, short of the full picture: commonly silence on segregation between users or matters, or on what the underlying model provider may retain.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

The Expert AI Supplemental Terms, valid from January 2026, state that Wolters Kluwer shall not use customer input to train Expert AI or the language models. They allow technical, usage and performance information and feedback to improve the feature, aggregated or anonymized where feasible. The Analyzer Supplemental Terms take the opposite position, granting rights to use input and output to train Analyzer, and customer data is processed to train the model weekly.

Personal data is partitioned, and the security factsheet says unique encryption keys are generated for each client. Every profile can be limited by country, division, legal entity or department, and retention and deletion are set out in the contract schedules. Privilege and work product go unmentioned, and what Azure OpenAI keeps is unstated.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA real position is published on advice versus tooling, short of full treatment: commonly a disclaimer without the supervision and competence dimension, or silence on jurisdiction limits.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

The Expert AI Supplemental Terms state that output shall not be considered legal advice, that it may be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, and that the customer must verify it, including by human review. Expert AI is intended solely for professional use by the customer's own profile holders. Schedule 1 says the services form no attorney client relationship between the parties. Advisor's suggestions are described as supporting legal judgment.

Legisway is sold to corporate legal departments and the procurement, HR, finance and business teams that work with them. Jurisdiction limits are unstated, and the product's support for a lawyer's competence and supervision duties goes no further than the duty to verify output.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureA published governance framework with real substance, short of testing results or a named owner.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

Wolters Kluwer's five AI principles cover privacy and security, transparency and explainability, governance and accountability, fairness, and a human focus. Its AI Center of Excellence runs a governance review so that sensitive, confidential or personal information is not used, and a November 2025 Wolters Kluwer article says Alex Tyrrell oversees that center. Advisor is described as built on these principles, while the principles page does not say which products it covers.

There are no testing results, bias findings or ISO/IEC 42001 certification. The Expert AI terms bar discriminatory use and automated decisions about individuals without human review.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on AI Safety and Data StewardshipRetention, deletion, access control, subprocessors and incident practice are all published, current, and specific enough to hold the vendor to.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

Legisway's contract schedules and security factsheet set out its data handling. Databases are backed up nightly within the same region, backups are deleted after four weeks, and recovery targets are three hours of data and 24 hours of downtime. After termination the databases are kept for four months and then destroyed, test copies made with the customer's consent go within two months, and the data processing agreement lets the customer choose deletion or return.

Wolters Kluwer commits to notify the customer of a data breach without undue delay. Schedule 2bis names the subprocessors, including Wolters Kluwer affiliates in France, Italy and the Netherlands, ABBYY for OCR, Claranet for email to Legisway and Teleperformance Portugal for support. The Expert AI terms add AWS in Germany and Azure OpenAI in Sweden. Data is encrypted in transit with TLS 1.3, encryption at rest is available, and penetration tests run regularly.

Customers get 14 days to object to a new subprocessor. Expert AI keeps personal data for the period appropriate to performing the service, with no fixed figure.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA real published position on liability, short of the full picture: commonly a stated indemnity without scope or caps.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

Schedule 1 of the Legisway terms for the French and Dutch contracting entities, version of March 2025, caps liability at the fees paid in the 12 months before the first event. It excludes indirect damage and lost profit, limits data loss to restoring the last backup and requires claims within one year. The intellectual property indemnity sits outside the cap. Wolters Kluwer warrants conformity with the documentation in all material respects, with error correction as the remedy.

The German schedule sets no fee based cap and keeps liability unlimited for intent and gross negligence, following the German Civil Code. The Expert AI terms provide the feature as is and as available, within the agreement's limits and caps. The Legisway Service Terms for the United States, effective December 2022, cap liability at fees for the prior 12 months under New York law. No insurance is described.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

Schedule 3 lists standard connectors for Salesforce, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, Box and KvK, with a variant adding the German BeA connector. In Salesforce, a new account creates a matching external company in Legisway and opportunity milestones create contracts. SAP passes vendor data through SAP Process Orchestration, and in Dynamics vendors are approved before they are created in Legisway. The Box connector syncs daily into folders named by matter number.

Microsoft 365 for the web handles document editing, with collaboration from Advanced upward, and eSignature runs through DocuSign, Signaturit, Universign, Scrive, Adobe Sign, LuxTrust and Lex Personae. Advisor works inside Word. API access comes with Premium, and the Files API now returns signature status, modification times and owners, without public documentation. The UK integrations page names SharePoint among connected platforms without describing the connection.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment options and data residency are published, including the regions available, what changes between tiers, and where processing happens as distinct from where data is stored.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

Schedule 2bis hosts Legisway on AWS data centers in Germany with backups in Ireland. The security factsheet places the servers in Frankfurt, in a virtual private cloud with live synchronization and failover servers. Processing for each AI component is named separately. Expert AI runs its infrastructure on AWS in Germany and its language model on Azure OpenAI in Sweden, Analyzer runs on Microsoft Azure in the Netherlands, and Analyzer's OCR runs on AWS in Ireland.

The service is SaaS with shared bandwidth, and there is no customer choice of region. In the United States the service terms say Legisway is hosted by CCH or its licensors, with no region stated. The older Enterprise edition was also offered on premises.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

The security factsheet says GBS Global Hosting, part of Wolters Kluwer Italy, keeps a management system in line with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for third level support, cloud infrastructure management and database administration. A Wolters Kluwer Italia certificate issued through RINA, valid to December 2027, covers software design and ICT services delivery without naming Legisway. The factsheet also cites the ISO 27001 and PCI DSS certifications of the AWS data centers.

The United States data privacy page shows an AICPA logo under its certifications heading, linked to nothing, and no SOC report is named. Under the data processing agreement Wolters Kluwer provides the information needed to demonstrate compliance on request, and Legisway has no self serve trust portal.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe supply chain is partly disclosed: providers named without change notification, or architecture described without the providers.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

The Expert AI Supplemental Terms name Azure OpenAI, in Sweden, as the language model provider and AWS in Germany as the infrastructure provider. No model name or version is given. Schedule 3 calls Analyzer a generic question answering model, and its terms list its own processors, including Holistics and Okta in Germany and MongoDB Atlas and Elastic in the Netherlands, without naming a model provider. Wolters Kluwer describes its AI platform as using several models.

A change of subprocessor carries 14 days' notice with a right to object, and a right to terminate on three months' notice if the objection is not resolved. Schedule 3 may be updated from time to time.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

The UK pricing page gives three packages with starting prices: Core from €8,000 a year, Advanced from €13,000 and Premium from €16,000. Expert AI for documents comes in every package, Expert AI across a whole matter comes with Advanced and Premium, and API access comes only with Premium. In the United States, Core and Advanced carry no price and Premium is quoted on request, with Advanced adding AI checklists and Premium adding KPI dashboards.

Ten add on modules, from contracts to invoice management, are listed without prices. Professional services and travel are billed separately, with no implementation fee stated, and licenses are personal and nominative across four license types.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

Legisway serves corporate legal departments of all sizes, with legal ticketing for business requesters and four license types from editor to requestor. Its FAQ names procurement, HR, finance and business leaders as users alongside legal, and industry pages cover retail, energy, finance, automotive and pharmaceuticals. It is sold across Europe, with local sites in English, French, German, Dutch and Spanish, and launched in the United States in 2022.

Expert AI is available in Europe and the United States. Legisway Meetings, launched in Germany in May 2026, runs board and supervisory board meetings with online voting through Microsoft Teams and minutes drafted by Expert AI. Interface languages are not listed, team size limits are unstated, and law firms are not named as buyers.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

9 public documents

The public pages on file for Legisway, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

From €8,000 per year

EUR, as published, never converted
  • Legisway shows starting prices on its UK website.
  • The Core package starts at €8,000 a year, Advanced at €13,000 and Premium at €16,000.
  • Every package includes the Expert AI assistant for documents, and the two higher packages also use it on matters.
  • Only Premium includes access to the API, and extra modules and setup help cost more.
  • In the United States you ask for a quote.

The UK pricing page lists Core from €8,000 per year, Advanced from €13,000 per year and Premium from €16,000 per year. Core includes Expert AI for documents; Advanced and Premium include Expert AI for documents and matters, and API access is in Premium only. Add on modules are listed without prices. Licenses are personal and nominative across four user types (Editor, Contributor, Reader, Requestor). The packages page for the United States shows no price for Core or Advanced and quotes Premium on request.

Implementation: Not stated. Schedule 1 bills professional services and travel separately from the license.

Confidentiality and data terms: A Legisway data processing agreement and subprocessor schedule are readable without an agreement in place. No business associate agreement is mentioned.

Note: The €8,000 floor is the UK starting price for the Core package per year. Starting prices may rise with users and modules, and the per user basis is not published. Prices in the United States are not published.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Permitted, in the contract

The published agreement expressly reserves a right to train on customer content, with no opt out located. Any de identification, anonymization or aggregation qualifier is recorded in the summary.

Legisway's published terms take two positions. The Legisway Analyzer Supplemental Terms, version of March 2025, grant Wolters Kluwer rights to use customer input and output to train or improve Analyzer. They state that customer data is processed to train the model weekly, with no opt out described, and Analyzer sits inside the Contracts module. The Expert AI Supplemental Terms, valid from January 2026, state that customer input shall not be used to train Expert AI or the language models.

They allow usage, performance and feedback data to improve the feature, aggregated or anonymized where feasible. The Legisway Service Terms for the United States, dated December 2022, allow customer data to be used to provide and improve machine learning features.

Source: Vendor PublishedCustomer Data are processed to train the model on a weekly basisAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Disclosed without a period

Retention is acknowledged in public materials with no stated period.

The Expert AI Supplemental Terms keep personal data for the period appropriate to performing the service, with no fixed figure, and saved conversation history comes with Advanced and above. The contract schedules fix the surrounding periods. Backups are deleted after four weeks, databases are kept for four months after termination and then destroyed, and test copies go within two months. Analyzer keeps daily backups for seven days and weekly backups for four weeks.

There is no stated period for prompts or AI output, no customer setting controls it, and what Azure OpenAI keeps is undescribed.

Source: Vendor Publishedthe period of time appropriate for the performanceAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Own model, documented

The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.

Legisway keeps its own permission model, documented in its guide to access types. Users hold one of four license types, and the editor license can carry any of five profiles: administrator, editor, contributor, reader and requestor. Every profile can be limited by country, division, legal entity or department. The Expert AI terms open the feature to Editor and Contributor profiles, and the access guide also lists administrators.

Only administrators and editors can create a contract record with AI. Between customers, personal data is partitioned and unique encryption keys are generated for each client. Licenses are personal and nominative.

Source: Vendor Publishedaccess rights by domain (Country, Division, Legal Entity or Department)As of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Notice committed

Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.

Section 4.4 of Legisway's data processing agreement commits Wolters Kluwer to inform the customer of any legally binding request for disclosure of personal data by a law enforcement authority, unless prohibited. Section 8 of Schedule 1 allows confidential information to go to a regulator or law enforcement agency where law requires. Wolters Kluwer then uses reasonable efforts to notify the customer and give it a chance to seek a protective order.

The Legisway Service Terms for the United States commit to prompt notice before such a disclosure. There is no transparency report. European data is hosted in Germany with backups in Ireland, and the language model runs in Sweden. In the United States the service is hosted by CCH or its licensors.

Source: Vendor Publishedlegally binding request for disclosure of the Personal Data by a law enforcement authorityAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Sources named, basis unstated

Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.

Legisway's AI works from the customer's own records. Expert AI answers are grounded in its contracts, matters, entities and legal records, Analyzer reads uploaded contracts, and Advisor reviews a contract against playbooks the customer creates and maintains. The product does not retrieve case law or legislation. The training data behind the Azure OpenAI model and the Analyzer model is undescribed. Advisor, launched in February 2026, can also be bought on its own.

Source: Vendor Publishedgrounded in your contracts, matters, entities, and legal recordsAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

Legisway manages contracts, entities and matters and does not cite case law or legislation, so a citator sits outside the product. Advisor reviews contracts against playbooks the customer maintains by hand, and Expert AI answers from the customer's own records. How a playbook, a contract template or a stored opinion in the Reference Legal Advice module, part of the Knowledge Center from Advanced upward, is flagged when a change in law affects it is undescribed.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 9, 2026

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.

There is no described path for declining a question and no confidence indicator for Expert AI, Analyzer or Advisor. The Expert AI terms say output may be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading and that Wolters Kluwer does not verify it. Schedule 3 leaves it to the user to validate or correct the data points Analyzer captures, and Advisor's suggestions can be modified before they reach the document. What Expert AI does when the documents in front of it hold no answer, and how Analyzer marks a data point it fails to capture, is undescribed. Advisor reviews clauses and rules one by one, so each redraft is the user's choice.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 9, 2026

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Legisway, Legisway Expert AI, Legisway Advisor or Legisway Analyzer. Legisway manages contracts and matters for corporate legal departments and produces no court filings. Expert AI answers from the customer's contracts, matters, entities and legal records and compares up to ten contracts in a table.

Source: Bar Guidance or Court RecordAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Generic reference

Public materials refer to professional responsibility in general terms without naming guidance.

The Expert AI Supplemental Terms state that output shall not be considered legal advice and must be verified by the customer, including by human review. They also bar automated decisions with legal effects on individuals without adequate human review. Schedule 1 says the services form no attorney client relationship. Wolters Kluwer's AI principles cover accountability, fairness and a human focus in general terms. No bar opinion, ethics rule or professional conduct guidance is named in the Legisway material or its terms.

Source: Vendor PublishedLEGISWAY Expert AI Output shall not be considered legal adviceAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Outside the fee relationship

The product does not touch a fee between a lawyer and a client. It operates before an engagement exists, or it is bought by a team that bills no client for the work. Savings claims aimed at the buyer’s own cost are recorded in the summary and do not make the row a savings claim, because no client bill is in the loop.

Legisway is sold to corporate legal departments that bill no client for their work, so no client bill sits in the loop. Invoice Management, an optional module, stores and follows up invoices and engagement letters, and the product does not describe AI review of law firm invoices. Its savings claims are qualitative and aimed at the buyer, saying it saves time and resources and removes the need to read every document manually, with no figure.

Pricing is per package per year, with personal licenses. Professional services are billed separately, with no implementation fee stated, and add on modules are listed without prices.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Disclosure pack published

A subprocessor and model provider list plus client facing disclosure material is published or available without an agreement in place.

Legisway's contract schedules are readable without an agreement in place, indexed by country with validity dates. Schedule 2bis lists the subprocessors with their roles and locations, the Expert AI Supplemental Terms add AWS in Germany and Azure OpenAI in Sweden, and the Analyzer terms list Analyzer's own processors. The data processing agreement and AI terms sit alongside them. Beyond those documents, there is no plain language summary of how the AI uses customer documents.

A change of subprocessor carries 14 days' notice with a right to object, and a right to terminate on three months' notice if the objection is not resolved.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Partial record

Some elements of the record are available, short of a document level export.

Legisway logs user actions, content access and changes, administrators see usage statistics and the audit trail, and the United States material gives Advisor its own audit trail. Expert AI keeps conversation history from Advanced upward, and the Files API returns file properties such as signature status, modification times and owners. At the end of a contract data is returned in the agreed format. Nothing records which model produced an output, and there is no disclosure template. Legisway's output is contract and matter work rather than court filings.

Source: Vendor PublishedTrack user actions, content access, and changes for full transparency.As of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 303 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 9, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746