P
Plexus
Plexus is a legal operations platform for in house legal teams, sold as an AI powered Legal OS. Business users raise requests through guided intake forms that assign each matter to the right lawyer or team, and AI fills intake answers from an uploaded contract. Contracts are drafted from templates, negotiated, approved under delegation of authority rules and signed through an embedded DocuSign integration. Plexus AI reviews each new contract against the customer's precedents, producing an executive summary, a risk summary and a clause table.
Its redline cards in Word change a document only when a user accepts them. Plexus Counsel answers questions across up to ten documents and follows playbooks set by the legal team. Marketing Wizard checks marketing assets against more than 230 Australian laws and codes and sends high risk items to legal, and Promotion Wizard produces trade promotion terms that Plexus's own lawyers review as legal advice. The AI runs on OpenAI's enterprise models, with contract review on Amazon Bedrock in Australia.
Founded in Melbourne in 2011 as a law firm, Plexus launched its platform in 2017 and sold its legal secondment arm to Axiom in 2022. ENGIE Australia, Caidya and Lion are named customers, and prices are quoted per Professional User license.
Plexus, head to head
Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.
Capability grades
All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.
AI Centrality
How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.
AI runs through a contract, matter and approvals platform that also works without it. With AI features on, each new contract gets an automatic review when its first version is uploaded. The review holds an executive summary, a risk summary covering legal, commercial and operational risk, and a clause table. The table compares the draft with the customer's precedents, or with general drafting principles where none are loaded.
Summaries sit in each document's Key Facts tab, and intake autofill reads an uploaded contract for party names, dates, values and jurisdictions. Marketing Wizard is where the model carries the work, rating each marketing asset high, medium or low risk against more than 230 Australian laws, codes and regulations. Its November 2025 launch said compliant content is approved automatically, and the product page says only high risk items reach legal.
Intake forms, templates, approval routing, signing, the repository and Insights reporting all run with AI switched off. AI features arrived in 2023, six years after the platform launched in March 2017.
Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure
Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.
Grounding differs by feature. Contract review compares a draft with precedents the customer uploads, and its Confirmed Clauses list shows what matched the customer's standard. Since March 2026 Plexus Counsel shows the name of the Knowledge material behind an answer, and Marketing Wizard recommendations carry citation links to the Australian legislation behind them. Where no Knowledge is loaded, features fall back to the broader model, and document summaries and Draft Advice always use it.
No accuracy measure accompanies contract review, summaries, redlines or Marketing Wizard. The one figure comes from Plexus's own testing of intake autofill, which it says fills about 75 percent of custom questions from the document. The AI Security Fact Sheet names hallucination and lists the mitigations: grounding in the customer's documents, prompt guardrails, tags on all AI generated content and review by a person. The Counsel help article warns that answers may include details that seem relevant but are not in the document.
Autonomy and Oversight Model
What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.
Most AI output waits for a person. Redline suggestions arrive as cards showing the current wording, the proposed wording and the reason, stay visible only to the user, and apply as tracked changes once accepted. AI comments follow the same rule, and since August 2026 redlining asks the user to confirm details it is unsure of, such as an address, rather than filling them in. Draft Advice, offered to select organizations, is generated when a matter is raised and stays visible only to the legal team until a lawyer posts it.
A warning appears when it is posted unedited, and once posted it is emailed to the matter's stakeholders. AI filled intake answers are marked, and users are told to check each one because answers can trigger delegation of authority rules. Playbooks are reviewed by their creator before publishing and can route a question to a named person in legal. Two features act without a person. Contract review runs automatically on the first version of each new contract, and Marketing Wizard's launch materials describe compliant content being approved automatically, while its help article routes submissions to a legal stakeholder for approval. How a risk rating is set, and what happens to a medium risk item, is undescribed.
Operational and Outcome Evidence
Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.
Named customers report figures. ENGIE Australia's head of legal and general counsel describe a 90 percent cut in contract execution time, a 50 percent year on year rise in executed volume and workflows finishing in 4.5 hours on average. That covers more than 320 users across 13 business units. Caidya's chief legal officer describes growth from 125 users to about 1,500 across more than 40 regions. Since October 2023 the team has handled more than 15,000 documents and more than 700 legal requests, answered in under two days on average.
Lion's marketing team reports campaign approvals up to 90 percent faster and trade promotion permit costs up to 50 percent lower, across about 1,000 promotions since 2017. Shorter customer cards cite Noumi, with NDAs executed in 1.5 hours, LocalEyes, with promotion approvals seven times faster, and PMG, with approved terms in 24 hours. The case studies carry no dates or method, and Caidya's region count reads 41 in its case study and 43 on the customers page. Plexus says more than 200 legal teams use it, and its about page says more than 250 companies.
Privilege and Confidentiality Posture
How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.
Customer data stays out of shared models by policy. The security page, the AI page and the AI Security Fact Sheet say customer data never trains public or shared AI models. The Counsel help article says it never trains or improves the model for anyone else. Each customer sits in its own databases and vector stores, which Plexus describes as zero data crossover between tenants. Staff reach customer data only with the customer's approval or under authorization from senior management and security.
The Subscription Terms bind both parties to hold each other's confidential information in trust and use it only for the agreement, and their data processing addendum limits processing of personal data to the customer's instructions. Neither contract mentions AI training. Inside an account, permission sets grant review and view rights per document type and organization unit, and legal teams can leave comments on matters that only legal can see.
The Draft Advice article says OpenAI did not keep the data or use it for training. Privilege and work product go unmentioned.
UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture
Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.
The advice line is drawn in the contract and in the product. The Subscription Terms state that the platform is not intended to constitute, or be a substitute for, legal advice, and make the customer solely responsible for the documents and results it generates. The AI Security Fact Sheet calls output general guidance rather than final legal advice and says anything with legal or commercial consequences should be reviewed by someone competent to judge it.
Marketing Wizard results say they are not legal advice and do not replace a full legal review, and the tool is intended for the Australian market only. Draft Advice warns that AI may produce incorrect, non compliant, non standard or incomplete content. Plexus also practices law. Under its Subscription Terms Promotion Wizard counts as legal advice, covered by Plexus's professional insurance as a law firm. Marketing Wizard work from customers without an in house legal team goes to the Plexus legal team.
Plexus Counsel is marketed as a digital lawyer. How the product supports a customer lawyer's competence and supervision duties is unaddressed.
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.
No AI governance framework sits behind the product. There is no responsible AI page, no named owner for model behavior, no description of testing before release, no results on output quality and no ISO/IEC 42001 certification. The AI Security Fact Sheet says AI supports rather than replaces human decisions and that all AI generated content is tagged, and the AI page says every AI output is auditable. The rest of the security material covers ISO 27001, SOC 2, encryption and tenant isolation, which govern information security rather than model behavior.
Whether review quality differs by contract type, jurisdiction or language is unaddressed. Marketing Wizard is built only for Australian law, while Plexus serves enterprises across Australia, New Zealand and Singapore alongside global consumer brands.
AI Safety and Data Stewardship
Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.
Data handling is set out across the security pages and the Subscription Terms. Data is encrypted with TLS 1.2 or later in transit and AES 256 at rest, encrypted backups allow recovery to any point in the previous seven days, and uploads are scanned for viruses and malware. Independent security firms run penetration tests, and staff reach customer data only with the customer's approval or under authorization from senior management and security.
The data processing addendum in the Subscription Terms commits each party to report a personal data breach without undue delay. It deletes personal data at the end of the agreement and promises notice before a new subprocessor is engaged. Its Annex III names 19 subprocessors, including Amazon Web Services, Heroku, Google Cloud, DocuSign, Auth0 and OpenAI, without purposes or locations. Retention periods for documents, prompts and outputs are unstated, and files uploaded to a Counsel thread stay available for the life of the thread.
The older data security page, last reviewed July 2023, still cites ISO 27001:2013, and the privacy policy carries no breach notice of its own.
AI Liability and Recourse
What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.
Two documents set the terms, and both cap and disclaim. The Subscription Terms, which Plexus says it does not amend, cap total liability at the fees paid in the 12 months before a claim. They exclude lost profits, lost data and indirect loss, exclude implied warranties, and make the customer solely responsible for documents and results the platform generates. The Legal Gateway Terms of Use, which carry no date, set the same 12 month cap with remedies at Plexus's election and leave reliance on generated material at the user's own risk.
Their warranty exclusion is subject to warranties implied by the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. Neither document carries an indemnity from Plexus. The AI Security Fact Sheet points to an intellectual property indemnity that OpenAI gives under its enterprise terms. Promotion Wizard output sits under Plexus's professional insurance as a law firm, while the software carries no insurance or service level commitment. Victorian law governs for customers in Australia, New Zealand and Asia Pacific.
Practice Systems Integration Depth
How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.
Word and Outlook are the main connections. The Word add in, released in December 2025, creates documents from templates, saves them as contract records and uploads new versions. Since July 2026 it also runs AI review and redlining inside Word for users with a Microsoft 365 business license. The Outlook add in, also released in December 2025, turns emails into contracts or matters, attaches conversations and sends documents for signature, keeping documents and contract data in sync.
Plexus announced both on Microsoft's marketplace in February 2026. Word Online editing has run since 2023, and a Gmail add in raises matters. Signing runs through an embedded DocuSign integration or a customer's own DocuSign Part 11 account for organizations under FDA rules. Single sign on works with Entra ID, ADFS, Okta, Google and SAML, across up to 1,000 domains. There is no public API yet. Plexus's roadmap, dated July 2026, targeted a documented platform API for September 2026 and a Legal MCP server for Claude, Copilot or ChatGPT for October 2026, and the release notes through September 2026 show neither.
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.
Plexus runs as a multi tenant service on AWS, with each customer in its own databases and vector stores. Personal information is stored on servers in Australia, and the privacy policy says data may also sit in the United Kingdom and the United States. Since August 2026 AI contract review runs on Amazon Bedrock in Australia, which Plexus ties to data residency and sovereignty requirements. The Counsel launch in November 2025 described Australian infrastructure with residency controls for customers that need them.
The other AI features call OpenAI's enterprise API, and where that processing happens is unstated. Region choice is not a product setting, and there is no single tenant or private deployment. The contract management page gives implementation times of one to two weeks, and two to three weeks on average to full deployment.
Security Certifications and Trust Center
Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.
Plexus states ISO 27001:2022 certification on its security page and in its information security policy, last reviewed March 2024. Its AI page and AI Security Fact Sheet add SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, which the security page leaves out. No auditor, certificate number, scope or date appears with either. A security portal holds the disaster recovery report, the ISO 27001 certificate, a penetration test attestation letter and network security, risk management and secure development policies.
Access comes through a request form, and verification takes up to three business days. The portal's document list has no SOC 2 report. Penetration tests come from independent security firms Plexus does not name. The older data security page, last reviewed July 2023, cites the 2013 edition of ISO 27001.
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.
OpenAI is the named provider. The security page, the AI page and the AI Security Fact Sheet describe OpenAI's enterprise GPT models behind Plexus AI, and the Subscription Terms list OpenAI among the subprocessors. Since August 2026 AI contract review runs on Amazon Bedrock in Australia, with the model there unnamed. The Draft Advice article, dated August 2026, still refers to OpenAI's GPT 3 API, and Marketing Wizard's launch post describes a proprietary AI engine.
No model version is mapped to a feature. A change of provider carries notice, since the data processing addendum promises notice before a new subprocessor and its transfer clauses set one month's warning. A change of model within a provider carries none. The Draft Advice article says data sent to OpenAI was not kept or used for training.
Commercial Transparency
Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.
Prices are quoted on request. The help center defines the unit of charge as the Professional User license, charged per person who meets the definition. The Subscription Terms set fees by the number of Professional Users and Workflows in the order form and bill overage pro rata. Fees rise by 7 percent plus CPI on each anniversary, and contracts renew automatically for 12 month periods. A free trial with no payment card includes Approve and eSign, document storage, legal requests, Marketing Wizard and Plexus Counsel, with no stated length.
There are no tiers, feature splits or implementation fees on the open pages. Promotion compliance is sold at 50 percent below traditional legal review with a guaranteed 24 hour turnaround. Random Draw, the trade promotion draw service, asks for sign in only at payment and caps prizes at $200,000.
Firm and Practice Coverage
Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.
Plexus serves in house legal teams in larger companies, with marketing, sales, procurement and operations staff using it to request legal help, approve marketing and run promotions. Its case studies come from energy, consumer goods, clinical research and lending, and its pages show consumer brands such as Nike, Woolworths and Nestlé. Plexus describes its enterprise base as spanning Australia, New Zealand and Singapore.
The Subscription Terms contract through Plexus Gateway for Australia, New Zealand and Asia Pacific and through Legal Gateway International for the rest of the world. Marketing Wizard covers Australian advertising law only, and customers without an in house legal team can send marketing reviews to Plexus's own lawyers. Law firms are not a target segment, and no team size or contract type is ruled out.
8 public documents
The public pages on file for Plexus, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.
-
plexus.co/security3 signals
Client Data in Training, Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation, Court Disclosure Support
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
plexus.co/subscription-terms2 signals
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice, Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
Prompt and Output Retention
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
Bar Guidance Alignment
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
Fabricated Citation Record
Read Oct 9, 2026
-
plexus.co1 signal
Billing and Fee Posture
Read Oct 9, 2026
No published figure
- Plexus does not show prices online. You ask the company for a quote.
- It charges for each professional user, and the contract also counts workflows.
- Fees rise by 7 percent plus inflation each year, and the contract renews every year unless cancelled.
- There is a free trial with no payment card that includes contract signing, legal requests, Marketing Wizard and the Counsel assistant.
- No plan names or setup fees are shown.
Prices are quoted on request, and the pricing page asks buyers to request pricing. The help center defines the Professional User license as the unit of charge, charged per person who meets the definition. The Subscription Terms set license fees by the number of Professional Users and Workflows in the order form and bill overage pro rata for the rest of the term. Fees rise by 7 percent plus CPI on each anniversary, and contracts renew automatically for 12 month periods unless either side gives 30 days' notice.
A free trial with no payment card and no stated length includes Approve and eSign, document storage, legal requests, Marketing Wizard and Plexus Counsel. There are no tiers, feature splits or implementation fees on the open pages. Promotion compliance is sold at 50 percent below traditional legal review, and Random Draw caps prizes at $200,000.
Implementation: Not stated. The contract management page gives implementation times of one to two weeks, and two to three weeks on average to full deployment. The Subscription Terms bill work outside an agreed scope on a time and materials basis.
Confidentiality and data terms: The Subscription Terms include a data processing addendum with standard contractual clauses and a list of 19 subprocessors. No business associate agreement is mentioned. Caidya, a clinical research customer, signs through an eSignature app compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11, and Plexus supports DocuSign Part 11 accounts.
Note: No price is shown, so no entry price is displayed. The unit of charge is a Professional User license per person, with workflows counted in the order form.
Legal Signals
What each signal meansA signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.
Client Data in Training
Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?
A public policy or trust page states no training on customer content, with no matching term located in the published agreement.
Customer data stays out of public and shared models by policy. The security page and AI Security Fact Sheet say customer data never trains public AI models, and the AI page says it never trains public or shared models. The Counsel help article says it never trains or improves the model for anyone else. The Subscription Terms and the Terms of Use leave training unmentioned. They bind Plexus to use confidential information only for the agreement and to process personal data on the customer's instructions, which limits use without naming AI.
The privacy policy mentions integrated AI tools for document discovery and scanning without a training position. Whether Plexus trains models of its own on customer content is unstated. The Draft Advice article says data sent to OpenAI was not used to train its models.
Prompt and Output Retention
How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?
Retention is acknowledged in public materials with no stated period.
Retention is acknowledged without a period. Files uploaded to a Counsel thread stay available for the life of the thread and do not join the document list, and accepted AI summaries, comments and redlines become part of the document record. The Draft Advice article says OpenAI did not keep data sent through its API. The data processing addendum deletes personal data at the end of the agreement unless European or UK law requires it to be kept.
Encrypted backups allow recovery to any point in the previous seven days. There is no stated period for prompts, Counsel conversations or outputs during the subscription, and no customer setting controls it.
Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation
Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?
The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.
Plexus runs its own permission model. Core, full and custom permission sets grant review and view rights per document type, scoped to the company's structure, and since May 2026 legal teams can leave comments on matters that only legal can see. Insights can hide sensitive document types, and only users with account administration rights can upload or change the Knowledge the AI draws on. Draft Advice stays visible to the legal team until a lawyer posts it.
No permission is specific to AI features. Between customers, each tenant has its own databases and vector stores, and Plexus staff reach customer data only with the customer's approval or under authorization from senior management and security.
Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice
If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?
Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.
The Subscription Terms commit to notice. Clause 6.4 allows confidential information to be disclosed where law, a regulator or a court requires it, provided Plexus gives as much notice as possible where legally permitted. It also takes the customer's reasonable requests on the disclosure into account. The standard contractual clauses attached to the data processing addendum add prompt notice of a public authority request for transferred personal data, a review of its legality and periodic information on requests received.
The privacy policy, effective May 2023, separately allows disclosure to regulators, government authorities and parties handling a criminal investigation. There is no transparency report. Personal information is stored in Australia and may also be held in the United Kingdom and the United States.
Primary Law Corpus Provenance
Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?
Coverage is described by jurisdiction with no identification of the underlying corpus.
Most of the AI works from the customer's own material. Contract review compares documents with the customer's precedents, Counsel and Playbooks draw on Knowledge that administrators load as DOCX or PDF files under 25MB, and intake autofill reads the uploaded document. Counsel also draws on what its help article calls publicly available information and licensed data, without naming the sources or licenses. Marketing Wizard checks assets against more than 230 laws, codes and regulations for the Australian market and links each recommendation to the legislation behind it.
Which instruments make up that set, and how they are kept current, is unstated. Where no Knowledge is loaded, features use the general OpenAI model, whose training data is undescribed.
Good Law Verification
Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?
No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.
Plexus reviews and drafts contracts and marketing material and does not cite case law, so a citator sits outside the product. Marketing Wizard links its recommendations to Australian legislation, and how amendments to those laws reach its rules, or which version applied to an asset, is undescribed. When a precedent in Knowledge changes, users regenerate contract review recommendations by hand, and each later version of a contract needs its review regenerated the same way.
Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior
What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?
The vendor describes refusal or abstention behavior in public materials.
Two features hold back when the input is unclear. Intake autofill leaves a field blank when the contract does not contain the answer. Since August 2026 AI redlining asks the user to confirm details it is unsure of, such as an address, rather than filling them in. AI answers in intake are marked, and users are told to check each one because answers can trigger delegation of authority rules. Contract review does not run on documents with unresolved tracked changes, bulk uploads or legacy files, and reviews only the main document.
Plexus Counsel has no described way to decline a question, and its help article warns that answers may include details that seem relevant but are not in the document. Draft Advice warns a lawyer who posts it unedited.
Fabricated Citation Record
Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?
No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.
The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Plexus, Plexus Counsel or Legal Gateway. Plexus reviews and drafts contracts and marketing material for in house teams rather than court filings, and Marketing Wizard's citations point to Australian legislation.
Bar Guidance Alignment
Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?
Public materials refer to professional responsibility in general terms without naming guidance.
The product's language on legal advice is general. The Subscription Terms state that the platform is not a substitute for legal advice, and the AI Security Fact Sheet calls output general guidance rather than final legal advice. It asks that anything with legal or commercial consequences be reviewed by someone competent to judge it, and Marketing Wizard results say they are not legal advice. Promotion Wizard is legal advice from Plexus's own lawyers under its professional insurance as a law firm. No bar opinion, ethics rule or professional conduct guidance is named anywhere in the product material.
Billing and Fee Posture
Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?
The product does not touch a fee between a lawyer and a client. It operates before an engagement exists, or it is bought by a team that bills no client for the work. Savings claims aimed at the buyer’s own cost are recorded in the summary and do not make the row a savings claim, because no client bill is in the loop.
Plexus is sold to in house legal teams and the business teams they support, so no client bill sits in the loop for its main buyers. Its savings claims address the buyer's own costs: a 65 percent lift in legal productivity, 90 percent faster contract execution and 70 percent fewer routine tasks on the home page. For marketing compliance it claims 30 percent lower external counsel spend and up to 70 percent fewer routine escalations, none with a stated method.
Promotion compliance, reviewed by Plexus lawyers, is priced at 50 percent below traditional legal review with a 24 hour turnaround. Fee treatment of AI assisted work for a firm that bills a client is outside the product's scope.
Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness
Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?
A subprocessor and model provider list plus client facing disclosure material is published or available without an agreement in place.
The documents a counterparty's AI clause asks for sit in the Subscription Terms, readable without an agreement. Annex III of the data processing addendum names 19 subprocessors, including Amazon Web Services, Heroku, Google Cloud, DocuSign, Auth0, OpenAI, InfoTrack, Zoho and Intercom, without purposes or locations. The addendum, with standard contractual clauses attached, promises notice before a new subprocessor is engaged.
Cloudflare, named on the data security page for web protection, is not on the list, and the AWS entry covers the Bedrock hosting behind contract review. Further security documents, including a penetration test attestation letter and the ISO 27001 certificate, sit in a portal reached through a request form.
Court Disclosure Support
If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?
Some elements of the record are available, short of a document level export.
Plexus says every AI action is tracked and reviewable, and all AI generated content is tagged in the document. The activity feed records Plexus AI summaries, documents keep a version history with side by side comparison, redlines apply as tracked changes once accepted, and Counsel names the Knowledge behind an answer. Document and matter lists export to CSV up to 10,000 rows at a time, and the Usage and Risk and Suppliers reports in Insights export to Excel.
There is no export of the AI activity log, record of the model used or disclosure template. Plexus's output is contracts and marketing reviews rather than court filings.