T

Turivius

Case law search, jurimetrics and knowledge management over more than 130 million decisions from over 100 Brazilian courts make up Turivius Clássica. GPTuri+, launched in 2025, is the AI environment, with its own login and subdomain, and Turivius says the two accesses are independent, so a customer can hold the platform without the AI. The assistant builds searches from a plain language or spoken description, answers against uploaded contracts and pleadings with the exact source passage, and drafts opinions, tables, risk maps and pleading outlines.

The Jurimetria Agent analyzes up to 500 decisions on a thesis and returns tables, charts, divergences between courts and outcome predictions; Turivius calls it the first of its kind in Brazil. Without the models, the corpus, search, collections and jurimetrics remain, which is what Turivius sold for six years before GPTuri.

Every answer is built on Turivius's own corpus of Brazilian decisions, each analysis cites the decision it rests on, and source tracing is a named feature. Answers on uploaded documents point to the exact passage. The assistant identifies the legal elements in a plain language description and builds the search itself. Turivius publishes a comparison with general purpose assistants on whether each works from real case law, shows full text and traces sources.

No accuracy figure, error rate, test set or evaluation of GPTuri is published; the one figure, up to 70 percent time saved, measures effort, not correctness. Turivius's terms say it exercises no editorial control over the database and gives no warranty on its quality or content, and that automatic reports, charts and classifications may contain errors, are not exact predictions and are only a guide.

Turivius frames the work as you direct, it prepares, you finalize: the assistant delivers material for the user to review. Each analysis cites the decision it rests on, and users are told to verify before using it. Answers on uploaded documents carry the exact source passage, and the full text of every cited decision is in the platform. Turivius publishes its own guide to validating a legal AI, aiming for answers that can be checked rather than trusted blindly.

Users choose GPT, Claude or Gemini per task. Nothing describes a point where the system stops or escalates, a confidence signal, or what happens when it is wrong or when the Jurimetria Agent's evidence across 500 decisions is thin. The terms say automatic reports may contain errors and are only a guide, but those terms date from 21 September 2020 and cover the older jurimetrics reports, not the 2025 assistant. For GPTuri itself, the only commitment is a general promise of human review.

Deloitte, Nestlé, Gerdau, Suzano, BASF, Unimed, BTG Pactual, Tozzini Freire and Machado Meyer are on the client list. Ten case studies have their own pages, covering Nestlé, Cosan and Suzano, and the firms Velloza, Bichara, KLA, FNCA, Bergamini, Benvenutti and GDM Consultoria Jurídica. Testimonials name individuals at named firms: Julia Moreira at Tortoro, Madureira & Ragazzi, Sávio Andrade at Machado Meyer, and Walter Cesar Vasconcelos at Laerte Fonseca & Advogados Associados.

Turivius won Nestlé's global innovation prize in 2022 for a project joining jurimetrics and AI, and Nestlé is also a customer. The only outcome figure is up to 70 percent time saved, with no source, date or method, and no figure is tied to a named customer.

Turivius's privacy policy says all user data is treated as confidential, only authorized staff with a need can reach it, server access is logged, data is encrypted and passwords hashed. That describes security rather than a confidentiality commitment for client material, though the product invites lawyers to upload contracts, pleadings and case files. The policy permits use of user data in AI models to personalize the platform, analyze use and improve services, and reserves anonymized data for aggregate commercial use.

Where a firm buys the platform, the employer may see a user's profile data, and colleagues may see name, photo and email. Nothing describes walls between matters, clients or users, though Projects group material by case or client. Retention is stated only as six months for access logs and otherwise as long as needed. Nothing says what GPT, Claude or Gemini may keep of a prompt or upload. Privilege and professional secrecy are not addressed.

Reports, charts, decision classifications and statistics are generated automatically, may contain errors, are not exact predictions, and are only a guide, under Turivius's terms, and the product framing repeats that users review and finalize. The terms limit use of the database and outputs to conducting and analyzing legal proceedings. They expressly bar marketing, campaign targeting, profiling people, candidate selection, passing data to third parties and business intelligence, and any use that conflicts with why the public data was released, invades privacy or discriminates.

Turivius publishes analyses of Brazilian courts sanctioning lawyers for fabricated citations, and a guide to validating legal AI, linking its product to the duty to verify. Who may use the product, any supervision or competence duty, a jurisdiction limit and any rule of professional conduct are not stated, though the corpus is wholly Brazilian.

ISO 42001, ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 marks and a DPO as a Service arrangement appear on Turivius's About page, under a heading about commitment to the highest standards of security, privacy and AI governance. ISO 42001 is the standard for AI management systems. The marks have no scope, certificate number, certifying body, dates or report. There is no responsible AI or ethics page, no AI policy or acceptable use position, and no accountable owner for model behavior.

The DPO arrangement is a data protection role, not AI governance. No testing regime or evaluation result is described, and bias is not addressed, although the Jurimetria Agent predicts outcomes and success rates by court and rapporteur and nothing shows whether those predictions are even across courts, regions or parties.

Site access records, meaning IP address with date and time, are kept for six months. Everything else is kept only while needed for the stated purposes, or where law or a legitimate interest requires. Users can request deletion, subject to legal retention. Only authorized staff with a need can reach data, and server access runs through authorized channels and is logged. Data is encrypted at rest, passwords are hashed, and traffic uses TLS.

Subprocessors are named: Amazon AWS for hosting, Mixpanel, Hotjar, Google Analytics and PostHog for analytics, and Mercado Pago, Stone, Pagar.me and PagSeguro for payments. No breach notice commitment, window or incident response description is published. The policy allows user data to be used in AI models to personalize and improve the service, and reserves anonymized aggregate data for other reasonable commercial uses.

Turivius's terms say it collected and processes a large body of public court decisions, related data and legal doctrine, which may include personal data. Turivius takes full and exclusive responsibility for the legality of that database and its use, and for title, originality and any breach of third party secrecy, intellectual property or image rights, relieving the user of responsibility; that is a vendor warranty, with a hold harmless, on supplying collected court data.

Turivius and its affiliates, partners and staff are not liable in any case for damage from use of the jurimetric outputs, including outcomes that differ from predictions, nor for any direct or indirect, material or moral damage, including lost profit, from using or being unable to use the platform. No liability cap, service level or insurance is stated, and no warranty covers AI output.

None of the systems legal work already runs on connects to Turivius. Its navigation and footer show no integrations page, developer or API documentation, connector list or authentication model, and no practice management, document management, billing or CRM system used by Brazilian firms is named. Projects hold files and saved decisions inside the platform, documents are uploaded rather than synced, and web search brings legislation and doctrine into the platform rather than sending anything out.

The one outbound provision is contractual: users may present platform reports to third parties, individually and in their original format. Nothing describes exporting structured data, and the terms bar running any program to scrape or index the platform.

Data storage exclusively in Brazil, on trusted infrastructure, is one of three security commitments on Turivius's home page, alongside full LGPD compliance and encrypted traffic. The privacy policy says data is stored on external servers, for example Amazon AWS. Nothing says whether a firm's uploads and collections sit in a shared or isolated environment, and no on premises or private option is offered or refused. The commitment covers storage, while the AI sends prompts and uploaded documents to GPT, Claude or Gemini, none of them Brazilian services. Nothing says where AI processing runs or whether anything leaves Brazil to generate an answer.

A heading about commitment to the highest standards of security, privacy and AI governance sits over ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 marks and a DPO as a Service arrangement on Turivius's About page. No certificate number, certifying body, dates, certified scope, audit record or report is published by any route, and there is no trust center, security page or compliance page. The heading speaks of commitment to standards, not certification, so whether audits were completed is not stated.

The home page asserts LGPD compliance, storage only in Brazil and encrypted traffic, and the privacy policy describes access controls, logging, encryption and hashed passwords; those are Turivius's own statements, not independent attestation.

GPTuri offers GPT, Claude and Gemini in one interface, and the buyer picks one for each task. Turivius describes each: speed and versatility for everyday analysis, deep reasoning for complex work and long contracts, and long context across several documents. All three read the same corpus of more than 130 million decisions. The privacy policy names Amazon AWS for hosting. No model version is named, and the provider companies behind the product names are never written out.

Nothing says where inference runs, despite the promise to store data only in Brazil, what any provider may keep of a prompt or uploaded document, or whether customers are told of changes.

Two environments are named and described: Turivius Clássica for case law, jurimetrics and knowledge management, and GPTuri+ for AI research, documents and jurimetrics, sold separately with separate logins. The terms set the mechanics. The subscription is monthly and renews every thirty days. The license is personal and not transferable, and password sharing is banned and grounds for suspension. Cancellation takes effect at the end of the paid month, with no refund.

Turivius may change the price at any time, but guarantees the rate in force on the first day of the current billing month. No price is published. The terms send the reader to the site or to email for prices, and every purchase path, including the create an account button, leads to a demo booking form with client logos and no rate card. No entry price, price range, per seat rate or minimum is published, and enterprise deals are contracted separately.

For law firms, Turivius offers faster research, more relevant results, organized theses and collections, and quicker delivery to clients. For in house teams it offers more reliable data, clearer reporting for the business, less routine work and faster internal answers. Named customers cover both: Deloitte, Tozzini Freire and Machado Meyer on the firm side, and Nestlé, Gerdau, Suzano, BASF, Unimed and BTG Pactual in house.

Coverage is stated as more than 100 Brazilian courts and more than 130 million decisions, updated daily, and jurimetrics is said to cover the main areas of law. No practice area is named as supported or not. Nothing says which courts or years the corpus reaches, whether coverage differs between the two environments, or whether the Jurimetria Agent covers the whole corpus. Coverage is Brazil only, though this is never stated as a limit.