I
IntelAgree

IntelAgree is an enterprise contract lifecycle management platform for legal, procurement, sales and finance teams, covering drafting, redlining, approvals, eSignature, a searchable repository, obligation tracking and renewals for both buying and selling contracts. Its generative AI layer, Saige Assist, is sold in five nested levels: comparison and summaries in every plan, then chat across a contract and up to 20 related agreements, redlining in Microsoft Word against the customer's playbook, data extraction from a plain description, and risk scoring built from the customer's own attributes.

Saige Assist proposes changes and legal approves them; redlines within thresholds the customer sets can be accepted automatically, approval gates hold contracts on chosen terms, and an agent mode asks for confirmation at every action. IntelAgree says it has built its own contract AI since 2017, starting with models trained on contracts from SEC EDGAR filings. Native integrations cover Salesforce, Workday, Bullhorn, Microsoft Dynamics 365, DocuSign and Adobe Acrobat Sign, with Workato and a REST API for others.

The platform runs on Microsoft Azure in the United States with a separate database for each customer, and holds a SOC 2 Type II report. Named customers include MultiPlan, Bullhorn, Casey's, Enlyte and Pebble Beach. IntelAgree, LLC was founded in Tampa by David Hull, Marc Miller and John Wagner.

Compared with

IntelAgree, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

IntelAgree describes itself as AI native since 2017, with extraction and metadata as the foundation and workflow built on top. The AI story page traces that history: models trained on contracts from SEC EDGAR filings in 2017, AutoML for customer trained extraction in 2018, contract classification for migrations in 2019, generative redlining against playbooks in 2021, contract question answering and risk scoring in 2022, configurable risk scores, approval gates and authority limits in 2025, and an agent with a prompt library in 2026.

Saige Assist, the generative layer, runs in the app and inside Microsoft Word. The platform also delivers conventional CLM functions that would run without the models: templates, approval routing, eSignature, a repository, obligation tracking, renewals and integrations. Saige Assist is sold in levels, with comparison and summaries in every plan and the higher levels added as the customer chooses.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureGrounding is real and documented, with linked primary sources and a described retrieval method, short of published accuracy figures an outsider can test.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

Saige Assist grounds its output in the customer's own material and shows where it came from. Every suggested edit traces to the customer's approved positions and clause library, a redline log records the clause source, and Saige Assist: Agent answers questions from the customer's contracts with a citation to the exact clause. The worked example on the Saige page shows a proposed liability clause pulled from the approved library with the edit tracked in Word.

Answers draw on the customer's playbooks, precedent and approval rules rather than the open web. No accuracy figure, error rate, test set or evaluation is published for extraction, redlining, risk scoring or answers. The only figures near accuracy describe audit coverage: 100 percent audit traceability across AI assisted actions, on the legal solution page.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system runs alone, what constrains it, and how a lawyer checks it are all published: modes, thresholds, review surfaces, and the route a matter takes back to human judgment. A categorical limit on a named mode or tier, stating what its output may not be used for, meets the threshold limb without a number.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

IntelAgree publishes what the AI does alone and where a person decides. Saige Assist proposes language and legal accepts, edits or rejects each change, with every edit tracked in Word and tied to the playbook. On the legal solution page, Saige classifies each counterparty redline by intent and risk, accepts it automatically only within thresholds the customer has set, and sends material changes for human approval, with the reason and authority recorded.

Approval gates hold a contract before signature when chosen terms appear, and authority limits route each approval to the person empowered to sign, synced from systems such as Workday. Saige Assist: Agent, an early release, asks for confirmation at every action. Risk scores use attributes, weights and bands the customer configures. IntelAgree's security FAQ adds that humans keep approval rights at every gate. Nothing published says what happens after an automatically accepted redline is found to be wrong.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

IntelAgree publishes more than 25 named customer stories. Headlines include Emmes cutting drafting time by nearly 85 percent, Everon saving 20 hours a week, Central Maine Healthcare saving $30,000 a year with eSignatures, Olsson reviewing routine contracts in about 15 minutes, Pebble Beach finalizing a contract in 9 minutes, GQR cutting a three day offer turnaround to seconds, Employbridge standardizing contracting across more than 300 branches, Enlyte making more than 10,000 contracts searchable and Spartan Race going live in 35 days.

The home page quotes Eleanor Daugherty of MultiPlan and Casey Ralston of Command Alkon. The legal page states an annual renewal rate above 95 percent across enterprise customers. The story titles do not give deployment dates or say how the figures were measured, and most outcomes concern workflow and eSignature rather than the AI features.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureSubstantive published commitments on confidentiality and training use, short of the full picture: commonly silence on segregation between users or matters, or on what the underlying model provider may retain.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

IntelAgree's published Terms of Service treat customer data as Confidential Information, to be used only for the purposes of the agreement and protected from third parties (section 7). The Data Protection Agreement treats personal data as the customer's confidential information and limits access to personnel who need it, and its security annex describes a separate SQL Azure database for each subscriber. The privacy policy, effective 21 July 2025, says the generative AI features do not share customer data with AI models accessible to third parties or the public.

On the other side, the terms grant a perpetual license to customer data once aggregated and anonymized into Resultant Data, which IntelAgree owns and may publish, and Saige Assist is described as trained on the customer's playbooks and decision history. Privilege and work product are not addressed.

Source: Vendor Published
DD on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureNothing published on the advice line for a product that produces legal work, including where it is sold to people who are not lawyers.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

IntelAgree's terms, privacy policy, trust center and product pages contain no statement on the line between the product and legal advice and no reference to lawyers' professional duties. The product is sold to procurement, sales, finance and business leaders as well as legal, and one Saige Assist level is named Contract Advice. The agent answers questions such as how to approach a renewal from the customer's own precedent, and Saige drafts redlines that favor the customer's side.

The positions published are about control rather than advice: Saige proposes and legal approves, the expert stays in the loop, and approvals run through gates and authority limits the customer sets.

Source: Operator Verified
BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureA published governance framework with real substance, short of testing results or a named owner.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

IntelAgree publishes a governance framework it calls governed AI, centered on how a customer controls the AI: thresholds for automatic acceptance, approval gates, authority limits, configurable risk scores whose attribute weights and bands the customer sets, and an audit log of every user action and AI recommendation that exports to a SIEM. On its own side, it describes building training data from labeled SEC EDGAR contracts so it owns that data, and James Parks, its Chief Data Scientist, speaks publicly for its approach to where AI agents should and should not be used.

No release testing process, test results or accountable owner for model behavior is published, and nothing addresses whether output differs across contract types, industries or languages.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on AI Safety and Data StewardshipRetention, deletion, access control, subprocessors and incident practice are all published, current, and specific enough to hold the vendor to.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

IntelAgree's trust center describes TLS 1.2 on every connection, SQL Transparent Data Encryption at rest, 256 bit AES file storage that is FIPS 140-2 compliant, secrets in Microsoft Key Vault, single sign on with SAML and OIDC, SCIM provisioning, role based access with custom roles, multifactor authentication on by default, an audit log of every action exportable to a SIEM, and point in time backups every 5 to 10 minutes with layered retention up to 10 years.

The Data Protection Agreement commits to breach notice by email without undue delay, return and destruction of personal data within 30 days of a request or termination, a subprocessor list in its Annex III with notice of changes and 15 days to object, and a separate database per subscriber. The HIPAA agreement requires breach reports within five business days.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on AI Liability and RecourseLiability is addressed only through a standard limitation clause that disclaims the exposure the product creates.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

The Terms of Service published on IntelAgree's site are effective 17 December 2018 and name the provider as CoLabs, the company's earlier name, in square brackets. They provide the services as is and disclaim all implied warranties. The customer indemnifies the provider for its data and use of the services, and the terms contain no indemnity from the provider. Liability is capped at fees paid in the 12 months before the event, and the provider excludes liability for lost data and breaches of data or system security along with indirect damages.

Florida law governs, with courts in Tampa. Nothing addresses loss from an AI redline, extraction or risk score that is wrong, and no insurance is published. Enterprise customers sign order forms whose terms are not published.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on Practice Systems Integration DepthDocumented, verifiable integrations into the systems legal work already lives in, with the depth described: what syncs, in which direction, and what a firm must configure.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

IntelAgree documents each integration on its own page with what it does, the data flow, governance notes and evaluator questions. The Salesforce connector is native and two way: a rep starts a contract from an opportunity, counterparty and deal data fill in automatically, Saige Assist extracts terms and flags risk, and status and the signed contract mirror back to the Salesforce record, with Salesforce roles honored.

Workday is a certified integration that connects contracts to supplier, vendor and worker data and can supply authority limits. Bullhorn contracts start from Company, Placement and Candidate records. Microsoft Dynamics 365, DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign, HubSpot and Google Drive have their own connectors, Saige redlines inside Microsoft Word, and IntelAgree works in Outlook and Teams. Workato recipes reach more than 1,200 apps, and an open REST API with webhooks logs every sync event. No law firm document management system is listed.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment model is stated clearly with partial residency detail, or residency is offered without the processing location being addressed, or the tenancy model is stated on its own with no residency detail published.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

IntelAgree runs on Microsoft Azure and is listed on Microsoft Marketplace. The security annex to its Data Protection Agreement places all customer data in Azure's US East data center with active geo replication to US West, and provides a separate SQL Azure database for each subscriber, with an IP restricting firewall and Key Vault keys per subscription. For customers in the European Economic Area, transfers to the United States run under the Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK Addendum, with Portugal chosen for governing law and courts.

No storage region outside the United States, private deployment or on premises option is published, and nothing states where AI processing runs as distinct from storage.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

IntelAgree's trust center states a SOC 2 Type II examination by an independent third party each year against the Trust Services Criteria, with the full report available under NDA through a request form. The security annex to its Data Protection Agreement adds an annual HIPAA Type 1 audit by a third party. HIPAA and GDPR compliance are stated, with a published business associate agreement and data protection agreement.

The auditor, report period and scope are not named on the public pages, no ISO certification is listed, and the report is released on request rather than downloaded directly.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe supply chain is partly disclosed: providers named without change notification, or architecture described without the providers.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

IntelAgree describes its AI as its own: extraction models trained in house since 2017 on labeled contracts from SEC EDGAR filings, AutoML that lets customers train extraction for their own attributes, and Saige Assist as a contract specific generative layer with its own ontology and feedback loop rather than a generic model. The privacy policy, effective 21 July 2025, says the generative features do not share customer data with AI models accessible to third parties or the public.

The subprocessor list in the Data Protection Agreement names Microsoft Azure for hosting and ABBYY for optical character recognition and names no model provider. Which foundation models sit under the generative features, and whether any is licensed from a third party, is not stated, and there is no commitment to notify customers of a model change.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Commercial TransparencyPricing is gated behind a demo request while tier names and feature splits are published, so the shape is visible and the number is not.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

IntelAgree publishes no prices; its pricing path is a demo request and an ROI calculator. The package structure for the AI is published. Saige Assist comes in five nested levels, each including everything below it: Basic, with side by side comparison, summaries and help, in every plan; Chat, across a contract and up to 20 related agreements; Negotiation, with playbook redlining in Word; Data Extraction, with markup and bulk markup; and Risk Management, with risk scoring.

IntelAgree presents this as paying only for capability a customer is ready to use. The 2018 Terms of Service set a one year initial term that renews month to month unless notice is given. Implementation is led by a dedicated team with a named account team, and its cost is not stated.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

IntelAgree has solution pages for legal, procurement, sales and revenue operations, finance, administrators and business leaders, and industry pages for construction, financial services, healthcare, hospitality, insurance, manufacturing, retail, software, staffing, technology and transportation and logistics. It is built for both buying and selling contracts, with role specific views for procurement and revenue teams on one platform, and its healthcare offering includes a business associate agreement.

Named customers range from staffing firms and health plans to construction, engineering and sports and leisure companies. Nothing published sets a minimum size, names contract types or languages the AI does not handle, or describes law firm use.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

6 public documents

The public pages on file for IntelAgree, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

No published figure

  • IntelAgree does not publish a price. You get one through a demo.
  • Its AI assistant, Saige Assist, comes in five levels that stack on each other, so you can start small and add more later.
  • The basic level, with summaries and side by side comparison, is in every plan. Chat, redlining in Word, data extraction and risk scoring are higher levels.
  • A dedicated team handles setup, but the cost of setup is not shown.

Structure published, figure withheld. Saige Assist is sold as a modular suite of five nested levels, each including everything beneath it: Basic (side by side version compare, conceptual summaries and help), included in every plan; Chat (search and contract advice across a contract and up to 20 related agreements); Negotiation (playbook redlining and editing in Word); Data Extraction (markup and bulk markup of attributes); and Risk Management (risk scoring).

IntelAgree describes this as never paying for capability a customer is not ready to use. The pricing path is a demo request, with an ROI calculator on the site. The Terms of Service, effective 17 December 2018, set a one year initial term that then renews for successive one month terms unless either party gives notice.

Implementation: Implementation is a phased rollout led by a dedicated enterprise team, covering configuration, data migration and workflow setup, with a named account team. Implementation partners named in the subprocessor list are Waypoint, Cimplifi and Koho Consulting, with Cloud Factory and EPIQ for data migration. No fee is published.

Confidentiality and data terms: A HIPAA Subcontractor Agreement is published as a template, with breach reports within five business days of discovery and Florida governing law. A Data Protection Agreement with the 2021 Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK Addendum is published for EU customers.

Note: No figure appears on any IntelAgree page, so no entry price is shown. The published Terms of Service date from 2018 and carry the earlier company name, CoLabs; enterprise order forms are not published.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Permitted, in policy only

Public material states that customer content trains, refines or personalizes models, with no matching term located in the published agreement. Any de identification, anonymization or aggregation qualifier is recorded in the summary.

IntelAgree's own pages describe customer material training its AI. The Saige Assist page says the assistant is trained on the customer's playbooks and contract data rather than the open web and that every result teaches it, and the AI story page says that from 2020 every extraction a user corrected or confirmed made the whole platform smarter for everyone. The 2018 Terms of Service do not name training; they grant a perpetual license to customer data once aggregated and anonymized into Resultant Data, which IntelAgree owns and may use or publish in any lawful way.

The privacy policy, effective 21 July 2025, says the generative features do not share customer data with AI models accessible to third parties or the public. No opt out is described.

Source: Vendor Publishedtrained on your playbooks and contract dataAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Customer controlled, no zero option

The customer controls the retention window, by product configuration or by contractual instruction, but zero retention is not stated as available.

The Data Protection Agreement commits IntelAgree to return personal data on request and make reasonable efforts to destroy it within 30 days of the customer's written request or the end of the agreement, with exceptions for data it has a legal right or duty to keep. The 2018 Terms of Service add return or destruction of customer data on written request within 30 days of termination. The trust center describes point in time backups every 5 to 10 minutes with layered retention up to 10 years, and an audit log of every user action and AI recommendation. No separate retention period is stated for Saige Assist prompts, answers or redline suggestions.

Source: Vendor PublishedWithin 30 days after a written request by Customer or the terminationAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Own model, documented

The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.

Between customers, the security annex to the Data Protection Agreement provides a separate SQL Azure database for each subscriber, with Key Vault keys per subscription and a firewall that can restrict access by IP address. Within a customer, IntelAgree runs its own role based access control with custom roles, SCIM provisioning and multifactor authentication on by default, plus approval gates and authority limits that decide who signs off on what, and the Salesforce integration honors Salesforce roles.

Procurement and revenue teams work on one platform with views and controls set by role, and out of office coverage hands approvals to audited stand ins. The Saige page shows redline logs marked as permission gated. No published guide sets out the permission levels or how Saige Assist: Agent applies them when it searches across agreements.

Source: Vendor PublishedA Separate SQL Azure database provided per subscriber.As of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Notice committed

Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.

Exhibit B to the Data Protection Agreement commits IntelAgree to notify the customer promptly of any request for personal data from a government, regulator or law enforcement authority unless law or a binding order forbids it, to help the customer respond, to seek the customer's consent before any voluntary disclosure of unencrypted personal data, and to keep an internal procedure for such requests. It also states that no back doors have been built for government access.

The privacy policy reserves disclosure to meet a subpoena, legal process or an enforceable governmental request. No transparency report is published.

Source: Vendor PublishedCompany shall promptly notify Customer of any request for the disclosure of Personal DataAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Sources named, basis unstated

Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.

IntelAgree names where its first models came from: in 2017 it pulled contracts from public SEC EDGAR filings and labeled them by hand to train extraction of clauses such as renewal dates, governing law and indemnity, which it says gave it ownership of that training data. Saige Assist works from the customer's own playbooks, templates, clause library and decision history. The product does not retrieve case law or legislation.

Nothing describes later training sets, any licensed data or the data behind any foundation model under the generative features.

Source: Vendor PublishedWe turned the SEC's EDGAR database into our training ground.As of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

IntelAgree manages a customer's own contracts and does not cite case law or legislation, so a citator is not part of the product. Nothing on the Saige Assist, AI story, legal or trust center pages addresses checking authority for later history. The agent page says the questions a team asks of its contracts change when a new tariff, regulation or force majeure event arrives, and nothing describes the product checking playbook positions against changes in law.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 8, 2026

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.

No path for declining to answer is documented, and no confidence score is shown for Saige Assist answers or extractions. The routing that is published runs on risk rather than confidence: counterparty redlines are classified by intent and risk, accepted automatically within thresholds the customer sets, and sent to a person when material, and the agent asks for confirmation before each action. Nothing says what the agent does when the customer's contracts do not answer a question.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 8, 2026

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming IntelAgree, Saige Assist or CoLabs. This is a statement about the public record rather than a finding about the product, and it covers fabricated content only. IntelAgree manages commercial contracts rather than producing court filings, so its output does not ordinarily reach a brief.

Source: Bar Guidance or Court RecordAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Not addressed

No located public material engages with bar or ethics guidance.

No bar opinion, ethics rule, statement that the product does not give legal advice, or other reference to lawyers' professional obligations appears in IntelAgree's Terms of Service, privacy policy, Data Protection Agreement, trust center or Saige Assist and legal pages. The compliance positions published are HIPAA, GDPR and SOC 2, which bind IntelAgree as a provider. A general counsel, Lee Rone, is named on the team page as responsible for IntelAgree's own contracts and as an advisor on product design.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 8, 2026

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Outside the fee relationship

The product does not touch a fee between a lawyer and a client. It operates before an engagement exists, or it is bought by a team that bills no client for the work. Savings claims aimed at the buyer’s own cost are recorded in the summary and do not make the row a savings claim, because no client bill is in the loop.

IntelAgree is bought by companies to run their own buying and selling contracts, and its named customers are staffing firms, health plans, construction and engineering companies, retailers and leisure businesses rather than law firms, so no client bill sits in the loop. Its savings claims are aimed at the buyer's own time and cost, such as Emmes cutting drafting time by nearly 85 percent and Everon saving 20 hours a week. Nothing published addresses fee treatment of AI assisted work for a firm that bills a client.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Subprocessors listed

A current subprocessor or model provider list is published.

Annex III to the published Data Protection Agreement lists IntelAgree's subprocessors: Microsoft Azure for hosting, ABBYY for optical character recognition, SocketLabs for email, Elevate for systems integration, WalkMe for digital adoption, Cloud Factory and Epiq for data migration, Citrix for file transfer, Gong for recorded sessions, and Waypoint, Cimplifi and Koho Consulting for implementation. The list names no AI model provider.

The Data Protection Agreement and a HIPAA business associate agreement are published as templates, the latter with breach reports within five business days of discovery and Florida governing law, and the SOC 2 Type II report is released under NDA on request. No client facing AI disclosure material is published.

Source: Vendor PublishedMicrosoft Azure Hosting servicesAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Partial record

Some elements of the record are available, short of a document level export.

IntelAgree keeps an audit log of every user action and AI recommendation, exportable to a customer's SIEM, and its legal page says the full provenance chain for an AI assisted action, covering the clause source, the approver, the context and the threshold applied, exports on demand, with 100 percent audit traceability across AI assisted actions. Saige redlines are tracked in Word and tied to the playbook position they came from.

Nothing published says the record names the model that produced a suggestion, and no disclosure template is published. The output is contracts and contract records rather than court filings.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Oct 8, 2026Evidence
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 303 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 8, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746