J

Jurisphere

Every working tool on the platform runs on models. Ask Juris answers research questions through named agents: a master agent that breaks the question into steps, Judgment Search, Legislation Search and Web Search, and a final step that writes the research note. The same surface reviews uploaded documents and drafts in a drafting mode. Skills and Review Playbooks package repeatable review and drafting tasks, and the Word add in brings review, edits, Skills and Playbooks into the open document.

Translation, List of Dates, Parallel Review across large document sets and Redline Analysis run as background model jobs. Projects, the file library and task management organize material for those tools and are not sold separately. The one business line outside the software is the Network, announced with the May 2026 funding, which matches clients with independent lawyers working in the same workspace. The vendor states that all legal services there are delivered by those firms and professionals.

Research answers carry inline citations and a View Sources tab. A citation opens the source in a side viewer, and a View Source button brings up the original judgment as a PDF to download. Research runs through named agents. A master agent breaks the question into steps, Judgment Search looks through the vendor's own database by meaning, Legislation Search adds statutes and rules, Web Search draws on curated sites, and a final research note combines them with references.

Web Search can also run on its own, turning the tool into a general purpose assistant. In the Word add in, answers cite back to the passage of the open document they rely on. No accuracy rate, hallucination rate, test set or evaluation result is published. The help center lists limits: research is a starting point, not a substitute for independent research or a final opinion, and not a replacement for a dedicated legislation database.

Section 1 of the terms requires that every output be subject to human review, independent verification and the user's own professional judgment before it is relied on. Section 5 forbids using outputs to advise anyone without prior review by a legal professional, or to make decisions with a material effect on a person's rights without human oversight. In the product, the research agent plans and runs its own research steps, which the help center calls a free thinking agent working within protocols the platform defines, and it may ask clarifying questions before answering.

Edits proposed in the Word add in arrive one at a time with Show in Document, Apply, Apply with Comment and Dismiss, and Review Playbook flags are accepted, escalated or fixed by the user. Background jobs such as translation, List of Dates and Redline Analysis run unattended once started and cannot be cancelled. Nothing says at what point the agent stops and hands a task back to a person.

The customers page shows the logos of 36 organizations, among them ICICI Bank, Tata Capital, Unilever, Philips, Zomato, CMS IndusLaw, Khaitan & Associates, Argus Partners and Veritas Legal. Nilanjan Sinha, General Counsel of ICICI Bank, is quoted by name and role, as are partners at CMS IndusLaw, Argus Partners, Touchstone Partners and Trace Law Partners, two senior advocates and a senior arbitrator. Majid Afsar Siddiqi, cofounder of Lex Consult, gives the one figure tied to a name, a task that took five hours now taking half an hour.

Arun Sri Kumar of Keystone Partners says the firm renewed this year after early doubts about hallucinated precedents. The site gives 15 million documents processed, more than 500 teams and an average of 88 hours saved a month, with no method or named customer behind the figures. None of the quotes is dated.

Section 3 of the terms leaves ownership of uploads, prompts and outputs with the customer and states that Jurisphere does not use Customer Content to train, fine tune or improve any AI model. The privacy policy says automated systems process that content on a transient basis, that staff reach it only for security investigations, legal compliance or at the customer's request, and that uploads may carry legal professional privilege, which its architecture and contracts are designed to preserve.

Projects are isolated from one another, and membership in an organization does not open every project. The confidentiality clause in section 7 runs one way, binding the customer to protect the vendor's information with no matching duty on the vendor. Two retention statements conflict. The terms and privacy policy say content is held in memory only as long as it takes to answer, while the help center says History keeps every task and output and is never deleted, though users can delete matters from it. What third party model providers may keep is not stated.

Section 1 of the terms describes outputs as research aids that are not legal advice and states that no lawyer client relationship arises with Jurisphere. A professional responsibility paragraph keeps the duties of competence, diligence and independent judgment with the advocate, together with confidentiality and conflicts, under the conduct rules of the user's own jurisdiction. Section 5 forbids using outputs to advise anyone without prior review by a legal professional.

The services are offered to businesses for professional use, and the account settings list Student among the roles a user can pick. The terms name no Bar Council of India rule, Indian court direction or other specific guidance, and no jurisdiction is excluded from use. The Network page invites clients to find a lawyer and lawyers to join. The funding announcement says all services on the Network are delivered by independent firms and professionals, a statement the Network page itself does not carry.

The vendor states that Skills in the Word add in are built and approved by expert lawyers, and that the research agent works within a framework of legal protocols the platform defines. The privacy policy says aggregated, deidentified feedback and ratings are used to evaluate and improve accuracy and reliability. Admins set workspace defaults, and each user's memories stay scoped to that user. No AI governance framework, accountable owner, testing before release, evaluation result or AI management standard such as ISO/IEC 42001 is published.

Nothing addresses bias or uneven output across languages, courts or regions, although the platform translates more than 22 Indian languages and researches across nine jurisdictions.

The privacy policy states that customer content is encrypted in transit and at rest, without naming a standard, and section 3 of the terms rules out training on it. Users can turn on two step verification and review active sessions by browser, IP address and last seen time. Organization admins invite and remove members and assign user or admin roles, and project admins grant admin, write or read access. Matters can be deleted from History and projects by their creator, and the privacy policy says residual copies stay in backups for a limited period.

Subprocessors are described by category only (hosting and cloud, AI model and API providers, payments, IT and productivity, analytics and marketing) and none is named. No incident response or breach notification commitment is published. The terms ask customers not to upload sensitive personal data as India's SPDI Rules define it, and the privacy policy says Jurisphere acts as data processor for customer data under the customer's agreement.

Section 8 of the terms caps Jurisphere's total liability at the fees paid in the twelve months before the claim and excludes indirect, consequential and punitive damages, lost profits and lost data. The indemnity runs from the customer to Jurisphere, covering breach, unlawful use and claims over customer content, and nothing runs the other way, including for intellectual property. Section 1 supplies the platform as is, disclaims any warranty that outputs are complete or accurate, and warns that outputs may contain errors.

No service level, uptime target, output warranty or insurance is published. Fees are not refundable on termination, and disputes go to arbitration seated in Mumbai under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. A separate written agreement with a customer prevails over the published terms where the two conflict.

The Word add in is documented in depth. It reviews the open document, proposes edits typed as insertion, deletion, rewrite or replacement that the user applies with or without a comment, runs Skills, applies Review Playbooks built on the web platform, and cites answers back to passages in the document. SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox each have a setup page: a user links the account under Settings, picks a destination project and a folder, and Jurisphere syncs that folder in, carrying over edits, deletions, restores, moves and the folder hierarchy.

Sync runs one way, into Jurisphere, and an Activities page shows each incoming file's status. DocuSign connects for signing workflows, files can be forwarded into a project by email, and the terms name an Outlook add in. No document management system such as iManage or NetDocuments, and no matter management or billing system, is supported. Whether synced files keep their SharePoint permissions is not stated.

Jurisphere runs as a cloud service on the web, with a mobile app and Office add ins. The privacy policy says the services combine proprietary models operated in the vendor's own local cloud infrastructure with models and APIs from third party providers, and that third party cloud and hosting providers run the platform. No hosting region, country or cloud provider is named, and nothing states where uploads are stored or where model processing happens.

No tenancy model, single tenant option, private deployment or on premises installation is published. Within an account, projects are isolated from one another. The customer list includes Alfanar of Saudi Arabia, and nothing addresses where a customer outside India has its data stored or how transfers are handled.

The privacy policy states that Jurisphere is certified to SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and the homepage and security page describe the SOC 2 attestation as Type 2. No auditor, audit period, certificate date or scope statement is published on the website or in the policies. The homepage, the security page and the privacy policy each link to a trust center at trust.jurisphere.ai, hosted on Scrut, as the place for detail on security controls and certifications. The homepage pairs the ISO certification with a statement that contracts and matter data stay confidential and intact.

The privacy policy says the services run on a combination of proprietary AI models, operated in the vendor's own local cloud infrastructure, and models and APIs from selected third party providers, engaged only where they give contractual and technical assurances consistent with its privacy commitments. No model, model family or provider is named, and nothing says which tools use which models or whether customer content reaches an outside provider.

The Fair Usage Policy adds that requests above a seat's usage threshold may be served by a lighter weight model, without naming either model. No subprocessor list appears on the website or in the policies, and no notice of model or provider changes is committed.

No price appears on any Jurisphere page. The Fair Usage Policy licenses seats per named user. Each question asked in Research, Document Review, List of Dates or the Word add in counts against the seat, and translation is counted separately in pages. Usage resets each monthly billing cycle, and above a threshold requests move to a lighter model or a queue rather than stopping. The thresholds themselves are not published.

Section 4 of the terms sets fees as communicated by Jurisphere and accepted in writing, excludes GST, charges 12 percent annual interest on late payment, allows fee changes at renewal on 30 days notice and makes all fees nonrefundable. Every page carries a Sign up link and a Book a demo link, and no plan tier or free trial is described.

The help center's Client Handbook covers twelve practice areas, from due diligence, M&A and commercial transactions to arbitration, commercial litigation, white collar crime, capital markets and real estate. Each has a capability matrix mapping every subtask to the tool that handles it, the lawyer input the output still needs (minimal, moderate or substantial) and what the team receives. Drafting a plaint from firm precedent, for example, is marked substantial.

Research coverage is listed court by court: the Supreme Court of India and every High Court, the Delhi District Courts and Bangalore City Civil Court, thirteen named tribunals and five regulators, with separate lists for the UAE, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, the EU, Singapore and Saudi Arabia. The buyers named are law firms, in house teams, enterprises and public institutions. Stated limits include no image analysis, text only outputs and research that does not replace a dedicated legislation database.