R
Regology

Regology is an AI regulatory intelligence platform for compliance, legal and risk teams, now sold as Bloomberg Regology. It is built around the proprietary Smart Law Library and three AI agents for Regulatory Change, Compliance and Research, with the Reggi assistant answering regulatory questions with citations. It identifies which laws apply to an organization and monitors bills, laws, regulations and agency updates in real time across federal and state law in the United States and more than 135 countries.

It then generates obligations, risks, controls and policies mapped to the source law. It works as a regulatory intelligence and data layer beside governance, risk and compliance systems such as ServiceNow, Archer and Diligent, and customers can import existing law libraries from spreadsheets and PDFs. Reggi is free for individual use, and the Professional plan costs $1,700 per user a month on a three year contract. Founded in 2017 in Palo Alto by former PwC compliance professionals, Regology was acquired by Bloomberg Industry Group on 3 June 2026.

Its terms of service commit to prompt notice of legal process, return or destruction of customer information on request, a twelve month liability cap and an intellectual property indemnity.

Compared with

Regology, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a document or workflow system.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

The Smart Law Library is a curated, continuously updated body of federal law, all fifty states and international jurisdictions. It works as a product without the models, since finding a law, following its changes and reading its version history all run on it directly. Customers can import their own law libraries into it from spreadsheets and PDFs.

The models drive the work on top. Three named agents, for Regulatory Change, Compliance and Research, decide which laws apply to an organization, assess the impact of incoming changes, and generate obligations, risks, controls and policies mapped to source law. Reggi, the generative assistant, answers questions in plain language, rates incoming alerts for relevance and is free for individual use.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureGrounding is real and documented, with linked primary sources and a described retrieval method, short of published accuracy figures an outsider can test.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

Traceability is the design goal. Each alert, assignment, decision, approval, rejection and policy update carries a timestamp and a link to the law behind it, so an obligation or control the platform generates leads back to the provision it comes from. That provision sits in Regology's own maintained library rather than the open web, and Reggi answers carry citations to it on every plan, the free one included.

No accuracy figure, error rate for applicability decisions, test set or benchmark is published for the agents or for Reggi.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside a supervising lawyer, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

People sign off on what the agents produce. Assignments, decisions, approvals and rejections are captured and timestamped, so a person accepts or rejects each output and that choice stays in the record, with rejection a logged path rather than an exception. The agents automate repetitive manual work and flag coming changes, and compliance teams act on what they produce.

The Responsible AI Policy commits to human in the loop processes for critical decisions. No threshold at which an agent defers is described, nor what the system does when applicability is uncertain or how much of its output is expected to be reviewed.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Operational and Outcome EvidenceCustomer logos and unattributed testimonials stand in for evidence, or results are quoted with no basis stated.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

Seven case studies describe deployments without naming the customer. They cover a sports betting platform, a large financial regulator, a global social media and technology company, a currency exchange provider, a regional bank, a cryptocurrency exchange and one of the largest American banks. The regional bank gained automated impact analysis, faster assessment of regulatory changes and better audit documentation, and the study of the large bank covers regulatory exemptions handled with AI.

None of the studies gives a figure or a date. Regology was founded by former PwC compliance professionals with seven years implementing regulatory programs at large financial institutions. No named customer is paired with a measured outcome.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureConfidentiality is asserted in general terms, or the commitment lives only in a sales conversation and cannot be read in advance.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

Customer data stays the customer's property, and section 6.A of the terms licenses Regology to use it only as needed to provide the services. Section 11 binds Regology to keep customer confidential information secret, to give prompt notice of legal process and to return or destroy that information on request. SOC 2 Type II covers security, availability and confidentiality, with BARR Advisory named as auditor in earlier announcements.

Nothing covers segregation between customers, privilege or work product. The material in the platform is a customer's own obligations, controls, policies and compliance decisions, including what it rejected.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureA real position is published on advice versus tooling, short of full treatment: commonly a disclaimer without the supervision and competence dimension, or silence on jurisdiction limits.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

Section 17 of the terms says Reggi AI uses generative AI and a large language model to answer legal and regulatory questions, and that the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of its answers cannot be guaranteed. Customers are told to verify every response independently, no attorney client relationship arises, and Reggi is no substitute for legal advice, so a customer consults its own lawyer. Section 18 says the platform, services and content give no legal, tax or other professional advice.

The buyers are compliance, legal and risk teams. No bar guidance is named, and nothing describes how the product supports a supervising lawyer.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureA published governance framework with real substance, short of testing results or a named owner.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

The Responsible AI Policy, effective 1 December 2024, sets out an AI risk management framework grounded in principles from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It covers every AI system Regology develops, deploys or uses. An AI Ethics and Risk Committee approves AI projects, and an AI Risk Management Lead runs day to day risk assessment, mitigation and staff education.

Each AI system is assessed for safety, security, privacy, fairness and accountability. The policy commits to regular bias audits and fairness tests, explainability techniques, human in the loop processes for critical decisions, continuous monitoring and staff training. No audit result is published, the lead is not named, and nothing covers uneven output across jurisdictions, industries or organization types.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA generic privacy policy covers the product without addressing what happens to documents and prompts after processing.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

Section 11.E of the terms has Regology return or destroy customer confidential information at the customer's option on written request, then certify it in writing, and section 10 confines personal data to performing the services. SOC 2 Type II covers security, availability and confidentiality, and Regology states a continuing commitment to keeping it. The Responsible AI Policy names data security measures, responsible data sourcing and consent mechanisms in a line each.

No default retention period, encryption detail, access control description, named subprocessor list, hosting provider or incident notice practice is published.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on AI Liability and RecourseWhat the vendor stands behind when its output is wrong is published and specific: indemnity scope, caps, carve outs, and any insurance or warranty a buyer can actually invoke.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

Section 22.A of the terms, last updated 9 January 2025, has Regology defend and indemnify the customer against third party claims that the platform or services infringe intellectual property. Combination and refusal of replacement exclusions apply, and the remedies are to procure a right, modify, replace, or terminate and refund unused fees.

Section 21 excludes consequential loss and caps each party at the fees paid or payable in the twelve months before the claim, with indemnification, gross negligence and willful misconduct outside the cap. Section 19 provides the platform and content as is, section 17 says Reggi answers cannot be guaranteed and must be verified, and section 20 disclaims third party content. No insurance is stated.

Source: Operator Verified
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

Regology sits beside governance, risk and compliance systems as a regulatory intelligence and data layer rather than replacing them. Direct integrations with GRC platforms, ServiceNow, Archer and Diligent among them, sync authority documents, citations and regulatory content into the GRC tool, with change alerts, impact assessments and a backlink to the full document in Regology. A GRC tool without a direct connector, or a homegrown system, connects through an open API that takes REST and JSON, XML, CSV and flat files over SFTP.

Customers can upload existing law libraries from spreadsheets and PDFs. GRC and custom API integrations come with the Enterprise plan. What an administrator configures for each integration is not described.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud delivery is implied and neither the tenancy model nor the region is stated.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

Regology runs as a cloud service, and the Enterprise plan includes round the clock cloud IT support. No hosting provider, region, customer selectable residency or tenancy model is published, and nothing separates where processing happens from where data is stored. Coverage reaches more than 135 countries and the buyers include multinational compliance teams.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

Regology holds SOC 2 Type II. Its announcements name BARR Advisory as auditor and give the scope as security and availability, later security, confidentiality and availability, and Regology states a continuing commitment to maintaining the certification.

No current report date, coverage period or renewal is published. No trust center or security page carries the report, and interested customers are invited to get in touch for it.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe vendor refers to advanced or proprietary models without identifying what sits underneath.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

Under section 17 of the terms, Reggi runs on generative AI and a large language model, and Regology describes the platform as using the industry's most advanced AI and agents. Reggi is presented as a generative AI model built on top of Bloomberg Regology that draws on more than 16 million laws and regulations and tailors its answers to a company's business activities.

No model, model provider, processing location or subprocessor is named, and no notice of supply chain changes is committed.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

Bloomberg Regology sells three plans. Reggi, the generative assistant, is free for individual use and covers summaries of regulatory material, questions on American laws and regulations and general compliance questions, with citations on every answer.

Professional is $1,700 per user a month on a three year contract. It adds the Smart Law Library for federal law and all 50 states, regulatory change alerts with impact assessments, Reggi across the library and alerts, full text lookup across American content, and dashboards and reports. Enterprise is quoted on request and adds global jurisdictions, customizable topics, lookup across more than 16 million documents, group workflows, compliance, risk, task and policy management, controls testing and GRC integrations. No implementation fee is published.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

Coverage spans federal law, all fifty states and international jurisdictions in more than 135 countries, and the library is continuously updated. Professional stops at federal and state content from the United States, and global coverage comes with Enterprise.

One platform serves every industry rather than splitting by sector, with dedicated pages for banking, crypto and digital assets, energy and utilities, gaming and sports betting, government and regulatory authorities, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing and software. Buyers are compliance, legal and risk teams at organizations from startups to large corporations. No list of the international jurisdictions, no completeness or lag statement for each, and no statement of what the platform is not built for is published.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

4 public documents

The public pages on file for Regology, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

From $1,700 per user/month

USD, as published, never converted
  • Bloomberg Regology has one free plan and two paid plans.
  • Reggi, the AI assistant, is free for one person asking questions about American laws and regulations.
  • Professional costs $1,700 a month for each user and needs a three year contract.
  • It adds a library of federal and state law, alerts when rules change, and reports.
  • Enterprise adds other countries and links to other compliance tools, and its price comes from a sales conversation.

Priced per user per month on the paid plans. Reggi is free for an individual and answers regulatory questions with citations. Professional is $1,700 per user a month with a three year contract. It covers federal law and all 50 states with the Smart Law Library, change alerts and impact assessments, the impact assessment workflow, downloadable and emailed reports, and in app support. Enterprise is quoted to the deployment, with user pricing that scales.

It adds global jurisdictions, enforcement actions, mapping of policies, risks and controls to regulatory clauses, and configurable dashboards. Compliance, risk, task and policy management, controls testing, GRC and custom API integrations, customized legal research support and round the clock cloud IT support come with it too.

Implementation: Not stated. Integrations and customized research support on Enterprise carry no separate published fee.

Confidentiality and data terms: None

Note: Professional is quoted only with a three year contract, and no monthly or annual alternative is shown. Section 7 of the terms renews the subscription automatically for each term unless either party gives 30 days' written notice before it ends. Enterprise terms, including user pricing, are set in the sales process.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Purpose limited, in the contract

The customer agreement or data processing addendum contractually limits use of Customer Data to providing the contracted service, and no surface names training either way. The limit is bound, which a policy page is not, but it is not an express training prohibition. If any surface names training in either direction, one of the other values is true and this one is not.

Section 6.A of the terms, last updated 9 January 2025, gives Regology a license to use customer data only as necessary to provide the services, and the customer keeps every other right in it. Regology owns Service Data, defined as anonymized, aggregated, statistical or benchmark data generated from a customer's use, with personal data excluded, and the terms give it no stated purpose. Neither the terms nor the Responsible AI Policy mention model training, and no model provider is named.

Customers upload their own law libraries and record obligations, control mappings, policy decisions and rejections in the platform.

Source: Vendor Publishedlicense to use Customer Data as necessary for purposes of providing the ServicesAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Customer controlled, no zero option

The customer controls the retention window, by product configuration or by contractual instruction, but zero retention is not stated as available.

A customer can have its data returned or destroyed at any time. Section 11.E of the terms has Regology, on written request and subject to contrary legal obligations, return or destroy all customer confidential information at the customer's option and certify it in writing. Section 10 confines personal data to performing the services. No default retention period applies to Reggi prompts and answers during the term, and the Responsible AI Policy does not address retention.

Source: Operator VerifiedUpon Customer's written request at any timeAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses walls or matter level segregation.

Work is assigned to named people, approvals and rejections are recorded, and Enterprise adds group workflows with reports at company, team and individual level. How access is separated between customers, between users or between business units with different regulatory perimeters is not described, and no document management integration supplies permissions to inherit.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Notice committed

Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.

Section 11.C of the terms commits Regology to give the customer prompt notice when legal process requests or requires disclosure of its confidential information, so the customer can seek a protective order first. If none is obtained, Regology discloses only what its counsel advises the law requires and works with the customer to limit the effect. Confidential information includes personal data and customer information understood to be confidential. No transparency report is published.

Source: Operator VerifiedRegology shall give Customer prompt notice so that Customer may seek a protective orderAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Sources named, basis unstated

Sources are identified without stating the license or rights basis.

The Smart Law Library is Regology's proprietary library of primary law from legislatures and agencies, covering federal law, all fifty states and international jurisdictions, with lookup across more than 16 million documents on the Enterprise plan. It tracks bills, laws, regulations and agency updates in real time and keeps version history for each law. No license or sourcing statement, completeness statement for each jurisdiction or list of the international jurisdictions is published.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Aug 29, 2026Evidence

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

The library holds legislation and regulation rather than case law, so currency here means whether a rule in the library is the rule in force. Real time tracking of bills, laws, regulations and agency updates, version history and links from proposed rules to their final versions keep it current. No treatment signal on cited authority, check of later history or citator license is part of the product.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.

The agents decide whether a law applies and map each change to obligations, and no path is described for an uncertain applicability call or a change that fits no existing obligation. No confidence signal or no answer path reaches the user. Rejections are logged, which records a person's disagreement rather than the system flagging doubt, and section 17 of the terms tells customers to verify every Reggi answer.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Regology or its Reggi assistant. Regology's agents work out which regulations apply to a business and map them to obligations and controls for corporate compliance teams.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 13, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Not addressed

No located public material engages with bar or ethics guidance.

No Regology material engages ABA Formal Opinion 512, a state bar opinion or other professional responsibility guidance. Its research includes an annual state of regulatory compliance survey on practitioner sentiment and compliance operations, written for compliance, legal and risk teams.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Outside the fee relationship

The product does not touch a fee between a lawyer and a client. It operates before an engagement exists, or it is bought by a team that bills no client for the work. Savings claims aimed at the buyer’s own cost are recorded in the summary and do not make the row a savings claim, because no client bill is in the loop.

Regology sells to corporate compliance, legal and risk teams. Its AI and agents are pitched as automating the repetitive, labor intensive manual work that swamps compliance teams, and the regional bank case study reports faster assessment of regulatory changes without a figure. No record of AI assisted work by matter is kept for fee purposes, and no billing or client disclosure guidance is offered.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Sep 6, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Not addressed

No located public material supports a client side disclosure obligation.

No subprocessor list, data processing agreement, statement of which model providers see customer content, or client consent and notice material is published. SOC 2 Type II comes with its auditor and scope in earlier announcements, and customers ask Regology directly for the report.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Partial record

Some elements of the record are available, short of a document level export.

Regology keeps a defensibility record built for auditors. Every alert, assignment, decision, approval, rejection and policy update is timestamped and tied to the source law, covering what was decided, by whom, when, on what basis and what was rejected. No export for each document joins that trail to the model used, and no model is named. The record is shaped for a regulatory examination or internal audit rather than a court.

Source: Vendor Publishedtimestamped and traceable to a source lawAs of Aug 29, 2026Evidence
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 430 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 14, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746