B

Bigle

Bigle combines contract creation, collaboration, approval and signing with Libra, its legal AI assistant. The document assistant summarizes an open contract, answers questions about its clauses, drafts replacement language and translates text. General Chat handles conceptual questions without an open file. Administrators can save assistants with the company's review instructions, including a supplier risk reviewer that checks liability, renewals and jurisdiction.

Libra 2.0 adds signer and certified email recipient completion and metadata extraction from imported agreements. Those functions sit beside the template engine, repository, workflows and electronic signature product, which provide contract operations beyond the AI features.

The document assistant works against the contract open in the workspace, while General Chat also answers legal questions without a source file. Custom assistants can quote the original clause, explain a risk and suggest alternative wording according to an administrator's instructions. Metadata extraction presents alternative predictions for review. The product warns that answers can contain hallucinations and need checking before use.

No measured accuracy result or linked primary law retrieval method accompanies the current product. A clause quoted from a customer's agreement is a way to inspect that agreement, rather than confirmation that a legal proposition is supported by current authority.

Signer detection extracts names and email addresses for a user to confirm before sending. Metadata detection runs from the document panel, offers alternative predictions and saves only after the user chooses Save. Administrators configure the metadata fields and the instructions used by custom assistants. Separate workflow steps route contracts through collaboration, approval and signature, with validation groups controlling who can approve.

The terms require customers to evaluate both generated answers and extracted information before making decisions. They also prohibit AI decisions with significant legal effects on an individual. Automatic escalation after a bad prediction is not specified.

Euro-Funding uses Bigle's CLM and Libra to address a large volume of contracts and outdated versions. Its case study describes selecting a platform, implementing it and getting staff to adopt it across a business that supports public funding, tax savings and sustainability projects. Red Points' legal director describes replacing a contract bottleneck with automation, collaboration and shared visibility. The customer catalog also covers Abertis, Aigues de Barcelona, E+H, Habitat Inmobiliaria, Forcadell and Amstro.

These are accounts of contract operations and adoption. No named customer study isolates Libra 2.0 accuracy or measures its effect with a dated before and after method.

Customer input and AI output remain the customer's property. The AI terms limit content use to delivering the service, with a separate exception when a user voluntarily submits feedback. Libra runs with a private model copy for customers in the European Union, and customer files are encrypted during transfer and storage. Access groups separate resources by team; administrators retain access across the workspace, while ordinary users see their own work.

These are application permissions rather than a description of how attorney client privilege is preserved. Third party model retention and privilege handling are not stated.

General Chat explains legal concepts, compares contract types and drafts clauses, but does not replace a lawyer's professional judgment. Its examples include confidentiality agreements, good faith, force majeure and hypothetical contract scenarios. The document assistant separately limits its context to the file in use. The AI terms say output is not a substitute for professional advice and require the customer to evaluate its suitability.

They prohibit entering information about children under 14 and using AI for decisions that significantly affect an individual. No jurisdiction by jurisdiction supervision or competence framework is supplied.

The AI services terms describe selecting generative models trained through Constitutional AI, using stated ethical principles to shape responses and reduce subjectivity. Prohibited uses include discriminatory, deceptive and harmful activity. Administrators also configure a custom assistant's role, analysis rules and response format, so a team can apply its own contract playbook consistently. The broader information security program assigns policy approval and risk management to executive management.

That security ownership is not an AI testing program. No release evaluation, named AI governance owner or result showing uneven performance across legal tasks accompanies Libra.

The security program includes encryption, SAML sign on, risk assessment, staff awareness and an incident reporting address. Workspace administrators create access groups and control the permissions assigned to each profile. Personal information is deleted after its purpose ends, apart from material needed for claims or legal requirements. The subscription terms separately remove stored files when the relationship ends.

In the product, users can download a chat and clear the current conversation. A named subprocessor list and a customer breach notification deadline are not supplied, and the duration of stored AI conversations is not defined.

The AI service is supplied as is, with responsibility for generated legal assessments and the use of content placed on the customer. Bigle promises reasonable efforts to reduce errors and delivery in line with industry standards, rather than a remedy for an incorrect legal conclusion. Separate support terms provide correction, repeat performance or reimbursement for defective support and limit related exposure to fees.

Those remedies concern the support service. No AI output indemnity or accuracy warranty is offered. Spanish law and the Barcelona courts govern the customer relationship where the parties may choose jurisdiction.

The integrations catalog includes iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox, HubSpot, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, Power BI and DocuSign. A REST API handles template structures, generation from business data, file downloads, signatures and document status webhooks. A universal connector retrieves data from third party APIs to populate contract forms, while the internal repository accepts spreadsheet updates.

Microsoft Active Directory through SAML validates user access after the connection is enabled for the workspace. The named legal document system connections lack individual descriptions of synchronization direction, permission inheritance and setup. API actions have more detail than those packaged connections.

Bigle is a hosted workspace with EU servers and an EU private model copy for Libra customers. Users access contracts, shared review and signatures through the platform, and enterprise configuration includes a separate preproduction environment, custom branding and identity management. The AI can be bought independently or alongside the CLM subscription. Voice dictation is processed locally on the user's device; Bigle does not receive the audio or transcription from that function.

Cloud provider identity, individual EU regions and a separate account of where model inference runs are not specified. No customer operated deployment is described.

An ISO 27001 audit is stated for Bigle's information security management system, and the security page links an SGS certificate verification entry. The certificate details could not be retrieved, so its current scope and validity period remain unconfirmed. The public security controls include AES 256 encryption, HTTPS connections, SAML sign on and regular cybersecurity audits. Its security policy assigns review and approval of the management system to executive management and extends the program to staff and suppliers.

No additional independent AI assurance is stated. The certification claim concerns information security rather than the accuracy of contract analysis.

Libra uses generative models for answers and drafting and discriminative models for identifying contract entities. The AI terms describe Constitutional AI as the training approach behind selected generative models, but do not identify a provider or model version. The current suite combines document chat, general chat and metadata extraction, with a private model copy for EU customers. Voice input instead relies on local device and browser processing.

The name of that browser's speech service is not fixed by Bigle. No named production model inventory or commitment to notify customers of model replacements is supplied.

CLM subscriptions are organized as Starter for up to four users, Premium for five to nine and Enterprise for larger teams. Libra is contracted separately, with Basic allowing 20,000 input tokens, 2,000 output tokens and 40 daily requests, and Pro doubling each limit. Subscription scope varies with users, functionality and service level, and prices are provided during contracting. The agreement has a one year minimum term even when payments are monthly.

Template automation services are separately scoped, and some training carries an additional cost. OCR for scanned contracts requires account activation and its own pricing discussion.

Legal departments use Bigle for contract requests, drafting, negotiation, approval, signing and ongoing contract administration. Procurement, sales, HR and IT can participate in the same workflows under legal team's templates and permissions. The suite also serves law firms, with the company describing both corporate and firm customers across Europe and Latin America. Libra supports contract translation in more than 20 languages, including English, Spanish, French, German and Portuguese.

General Chat covers legal concepts beyond an individual agreement, while its document assistant stays with the open file. Supported jurisdictions and excluded practice areas are not enumerated.