X
Xakia

Xakia is a matter management and legal operations platform for in house legal teams of roughly 2 to 200 people, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Melbourne, with offices in Kansas City and London. Modules cover matters and tasks, legal intake and triage, contracts, spend and budgets, documents, entities, disputes and reporting. Xakia Connect is a portal where outside firms accept work, update matters, submit invoices and communicate, and Xakia charges firms nothing to use it and takes no percentage of invoice value.

AI features cover contract review and redlining, contract summaries, key terms extraction and Smart Search, and AI invoice review is listed as coming soon. AI is a paid add on for Advance and Professional, included with usage caps in Enterprise and without caps in All In. Plans run from $100 to $230 per user a month. Customers store data on Microsoft Azure in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom or the United States, and the platform can be configured in seven languages. Xakia publishes its Terms of Service, data processing addendum, AI addendum and subprocessor list.

Compared with

Xakia, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is present but peripheral: a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

Xakia sells AI as an add on for its Advance and Professional plans, includes it with usage caps in Enterprise and includes it without caps in All In. Customers on the lower plans can run the product without AI. The core is matter and task management, intake and triage, contracts, spend and budgets, documents, entities and reporting, all workflow and record keeping with no model behind them. The AI features are contract review and redlining in Word against the customer's playbook, contract summaries and key terms extraction.

Smart Search turns a plain English request into a query the user can edit and save. Xakia's AI page also describes invoice review against billing guidelines, which the plan comparison lists as coming soon. An MCP server with connectors to Claude and Copilot is listed as coming soon for All In. The AI page makes every AI feature opt in, and the FAQ describes AI as a set of features Xakia is still expanding.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureGrounding is real and documented, with linked primary sources and a described retrieval method, short of published accuracy figures an outsider can test.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

Xakia's AI points back to the customer's own documents. Key terms extraction returns each term with a confidence score, the clause it came from and the exact text it relied on. A user reviews each value, corrects it and clicks Apply before anything reaches the contract repository. Contract review marks up a third party contract in Word against the customer's chosen playbook, governing law, market practice and basic drafting standards, at a Pragmatic, Balanced or Strict setting.

It flags each deviation with a suggested redline for the lawyer to review. Smart Search shows the query it built from a plain English request, which the user can edit and save. The AI addendum says output may not be accurate or up to date and must be reviewed by a lawyer. The FAQ commits to expanding AI without compromising accuracy, and Xakia gives no accuracy figure, error rate or test results.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

People make every key decision in Xakia. Legal teams route and tag intake requests, set up matters from templates and assign tasks, and the Enterprise plan adds intake workflows and contract approval and signing workflows that the legal team configures. The AI features work on documents a user has open, offering redlines, summaries and extracted terms rather than acting on their own. The AI addendum requires a lawyer's review of output and bars automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals without human review.

Xakia describes no agent that acts unattended, no threshold at which the AI stops or hands work to a person, and no remedy when an output is wrong.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal deployment evidence with substance, short of full attribution or measurement: a named customer without figures, or figures without the named customer.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

Xakia names its customers and the people it quotes. Case studies cover Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, Medibank, Škoda Auto, Cancer Council Queensland, Healthscope, Axiom Medical, Movember, Syneos Health and JERA. At Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, the Australian legal team replaced paper forms compiled monthly into a spreadsheet, whose reports could run up to two months behind, with reporting that is current on any day.

Medibank's legal department of about 25 people deployed Xakia with NetDocuments in a matter of weeks, according to senior legal counsel Kerryn Saric. Testimonials name the general counsel of BlueScope Buildings and Kiwi Property and staff at Tabcorp and the City of Murfreesboro. Chief legal officer Chuck Kable says Xakia has saved him hundreds of hours. The case studies carry no publication date, and none attaches a measured figure to an AI feature.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureSubstantive published commitments on confidentiality and training use, short of the full picture: commonly silence on segregation between users or matters, or on what the underlying model provider may retain.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

Xakia controls access with role based permissions at user, team or matter level, sensitive matters can be restricted to named individuals, and outside counsel see only what the customer shares through Xakia Connect. Single sign on runs through the customer's identity provider. The AI addendum bars Xakia and its third party AI tools from training any model on inputs or outputs, processes inputs transiently and keeps no inputs or outputs once output is delivered.

It also lets Xakia train its AI features on anonymized data and statistics derived from inputs. Data and uploaded documents are encrypted in use, in transit and at rest, under ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 certification. The terms and the addendum treat customer data as confidential without separate treatment of privilege or work product.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureThe vendor states plainly what the product is and is not, who may use it, and how it supports a lawyer’s competence and supervision duties. Jurisdiction limits are named and any consumer facing surface carries a clear disclosure.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

Section 5.3 of Xakia's AI addendum, effective 1 February 2026, states that AI output is general information and does not constitute legal advice. The AI features are not a substitute for legal or professional skill, judgment and experience. They must be used only by or under the direct supervision of legal practitioners in line with applicable professional conduct rules. Users must validate or ignore notifications using their own professional judgment, because output may not be accurate or up to date.

Section 5.4 requires a lawyer to review output as appropriate for the use case. Section 3.2(a) bars automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals without proper human review in line with professional ethics rules. The buyer is an in house legal team. No specific bar guidance is named.

Source: Vendor Published
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNo governance position published for a system whose output affects legal outcomes.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

Xakia's AI controls sit in the features and the contract rather than in a governance framework. Its AI page makes every feature opt in, so the customer decides what its team uses and when, and gives each feature a human checkpoint so nothing is applied without a user's sign off. The AI addendum bars automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals without proper human review, and bars uses that are discriminatory or bias inducing.

It also requires a lawyer to review output. The FAQ says Xakia expands its AI with a focus on saving time without compromising accuracy or security. Xakia sets out no AI principles, owner of AI governance, testing before release or bias findings, holds no ISO/IEC 42001 certification, and its security page covers information security.

Source: Operator Verified
AA on AI Safety and Data StewardshipRetention, deletion, access control, subprocessors and incident practice are all published, current, and specific enough to hold the vendor to.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

Xakia publishes the terms that govern data handling. Its Terms of Service keep subscriber data for 30 days after termination, during which the subscriber can request a copy, and then delete it permanently. The AI addendum says inputs are processed transiently and that Xakia keeps no inputs or outputs once the output is delivered. The data processing addendum commits Xakia to notify the subscriber of a security breach involving its personal data without undue delay, with the information needed for its own reporting duties.

The trust center lists subprocessors in effect since 1 April 2024, including Microsoft for hosting, HubSpot, Intercom, Stripe, Twilio and Xero, each with its country and purpose, and keeps earlier lists. Data and uploaded documents are encrypted in use, in transit and at rest, data and access logs are backed up, and role based permissions reach down to matter level with single sign on. Annual third party penetration tests and continuous vulnerability scanning support the ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA real published position on liability, short of the full picture: commonly a stated indemnity without scope or caps.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

Xakia publishes the Terms of Service for its platform, effective 1 October 2025, and section 5.5 of its AI addendum applies their warranty disclaimers and liability limits to the AI features. Each party's liability is capped at the amounts paid or payable in the 12 months before the first incident. Xakia's liability for breaching its data security or confidentiality obligations, or any data processing addendum, rises to three times that cap.

Indirect, consequential and lost profit damages are excluded. Xakia defends the subscriber and its users against third party claims that the platform, used as authorized, infringes intellectual property. Trials and betas carry no warranty or indemnity, and Xakia's liability for them is capped at $1,000. The AI addendum says output may not be accurate or up to date and must be reviewed by a lawyer, and Xakia gives no indemnity specific to AI output.

Source: Operator Verified
BB on Practice Systems Integration DepthReal integrations exist and are documented, short of depth: named connections without a description of what they actually move.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

Xakia's pricing page lists its integrations by plan. Every plan includes Outlook, Word, SharePoint, Gmail and Microsoft Teams integrations, API access, and single sign on through Entra, Okta, SCIM or ADFS. Professional and above add iManage and NetDocuments integrations and connections to Brightflag, DocuSign, Ironclad and Josef. Slack and Salesforce appear on the higher plans, with Salesforce at extra cost. Xakia offers to keep documents in the customer's own SharePoint rather than migrating them, and the API carries no charge.

The pages name each connection without saying what data moves in which direction or what an administrator configures. An MCP server with connectors to Claude and Copilot is listed as coming soon for All In.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment model is stated clearly with partial residency detail, or residency is offered without the processing location being addressed, or the tenancy model is stated on its own with no residency detail published.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

Xakia runs on Microsoft Azure, and customers choose where data is stored in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom or the United States, with a Middle East location listed as coming soon. Different users in one account can have different data locations. European and UK customers can keep data on Azure servers in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands, and the Terms of Service, effective 1 October 2025, are built around the data location the subscriber selects.

Section 1.4 of the AI addendum says AI processing runs where the third party AI tools are available and may differ from the selected location, with the processing location shown in the subscriber's account. Separate privacy policies cover Australia, the United States, Europe and Canada. Whether customers share infrastructure is not stated.

Source: Operator Verified
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

Xakia states certification to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliance on its security page, FAQ and pricing page, with regular independent audits of its applications, systems and networks. Its trust center shows compliance monitoring and controls and offers the ISO 27001:2022 certificate, a penetration test attestation and the SOC 2 Type 2 report on request. The data processing agreement and current and past subprocessor lists sit beside them.

Third party experts test the application and infrastructure once a year, and third party tools scan the platform for vulnerabilities continuously. The platform is hosted on Microsoft Azure in Tier III facilities certified to ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA and FedRAMP, with Australia's IRAP and the UK's G Cloud among the regional standards. The open pages name no auditing firm, audit period or report date.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe vendor refers to advanced or proprietary models without identifying what sits underneath.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

Xakia's AI addendum refers to third party AI tools, defined as the third party language models and AI technology behind its AI features, without naming any of them. It says Xakia does not control their operation or continued availability, and that their processing location may differ from the subscriber's data location and is shown in the subscriber's account. Section 6 says any flow down terms the providers require are displayed at trust.xakiatech.com, and section 8.3 gives at least thirty days' notice of changes to the addendum.

The subprocessor list in Xakia's trust center names Microsoft and business systems such as HubSpot and Stripe but no AI model provider. Neither the third party AI tools nor Xakia may train models on customer inputs or outputs.

Source: Operator Verified
AA on Commercial TransparencyA buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, and what implementation adds.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

Xakia's pricing page lists four plans priced per user per month, with Advance at $100, Professional at $125, Enterprise at $155 and All In at $230. A currency selector shows prices in Australian dollars, United States dollars, euros or pounds. Plans run month to month with no lock in, and annual billing takes up to 10 percent off. AI access adds $50 per user a month on Advance and $30 on Professional, priced in United States dollars with usage caps, and is included with caps on Enterprise and without caps on All In.

Onboarding is a separate one off fee, with light and full options covering data migration, best practice guidance and training, and its amount is quoted rather than shown. A free 14 day trial needs no payment card. Internal requesters, outside counsel on the Connect portal and invoice volume carry no charge, and Xakia takes no percentage of invoice value, which it calls a clip of the ticket. A stakeholder license gives non legal users access to contracts and entity management at a flat annual rate.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

Xakia targets in house legal teams of roughly 2 to 200 people, a range it repeats on its pricing page. The platform can be configured in English, Japanese, Spanish, French, Danish, Dutch and Brazilian Portuguese, and the spend module supports all currencies. Xakia has offices in Melbourne, Kansas City and London and says it has many hundreds of clients worldwide. Scope is stated by module, covering matters, intake, contracts, spend, documents, entities, disputes and reporting, with a stakeholder license for non legal users.

Customers store data in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom or the United States and can set different data locations for different users. Industry segments and practice areas are not described.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

7 public documents

The public pages on file for Xakia, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

From $100 per user per month

USD, as published, never converted
  • Advance is $100 per person a month, Professional $125, Enterprise $155 and All In $230.
  • Plans are month to month with no lock in, and paying yearly takes up to 10 percent off.
  • AI costs an extra $50 a person a month on Advance and $30 on Professional, and is included on Enterprise and All In.
  • Onboarding is a separate one off fee with a light and a full option.
  • There is a free 14 day trial with no payment card, and outside counsel use the Connect portal for free.

Xakia's pricing page lists four plans priced per user per month, with Advance at $100, Professional at $125, Enterprise at $155 and All In at $230. A currency selector shows prices in Australian dollars, United States dollars, euros or pounds. Plans are month to month with no lock in, and annual billing takes up to 10 percent off. AI access adds $50 per user a month on Advance and $30 on Professional, priced in United States dollars with usage caps, is included with caps on Enterprise and has no caps on All In.

A free 14 day trial needs no payment card. Internal requesters, outside counsel on the Connect portal and invoice volume carry no charge.

Implementation: Onboarding is a separate one off fee, with a light and a full option covering data migration from an existing system, best practice guidance, legal leadership training and team training. The fee is quoted rather than published, and Xakia says most teams finish configuration and onboarding within a few days to a couple of weeks.

Confidentiality and data terms: Xakia's data processing addendum is published on its site and downloadable from its trust center, and Xakia states HIPAA compliance.

Note: Outside counsel never pay to use the Connect portal to submit invoices, and Xakia takes no percentage of invoice value. A stakeholder license gives non legal users access to contracts and entity management at a flat annual rate, and Salesforce integration costs extra on the plans that offer it.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Permitted, in the contract

The published agreement expressly reserves a right to train on customer content, with no opt out located. Any de identification, anonymization or aggregation qualifier is recorded in the summary.

Xakia's AI addendum bars training on customer content and permits training on anonymized data derived from it. The addendum, effective 1 February 2026, forms part of the Terms of Service. Section 2.4 says neither Xakia nor its third party AI tools will train any AI model on inputs or outputs, and that using them to improve service features is not training. Section 2.5 lets Xakia collect derived data, defined as anonymous data and statistics derived from inputs.

Xakia may use that data for benchmarking, reports and training its AI features or AI models, and discloses it outside Xakia only in anonymized, aggregated form. Section 1.3 lets a customer opt out of the AI features in its account, and the addendum offers no separate opt out from derived data. Xakia does not name the third party AI tools behind the features, and their processing may run outside the customer's selected data location, as shown in the customer's account.

Source: Operator Verifiedincluding benchmarking, reports, and Training the AI Features or AI modelsAs of Sep 6, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Disclosed fixed window

A specific retention period is published and the customer cannot change it.

Section 2.8 of Xakia's AI addendum sets the retention period for AI prompts and outputs at zero. Because the AI features process data ephemerally, Xakia does not retain inputs or outputs after the output is delivered. Inputs are processed transiently and not stored, and the customer is responsible for capturing anything it needs to keep. Xakia fixes the period rather than letting the customer configure it. It governs the AI features rather than matter data held in the platform, which the Terms of Service keep for 30 days after termination before permanent deletion.

Extracted key terms enter the contract repository only when a user clicks Apply, and then follow the matter data's retention.

Source: Operator VerifiedXakia does not retain Inputs or Outputs after Output is deliveredAs of Sep 6, 2026Evidence

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Own model, documented

The product maintains its own permission model, documented, requiring the firm to keep it aligned.

Role based permissions control access by user, team or matter, Xakia says sensitive matters can be restricted to specific people, and outside counsel see only what the customer chooses to share through the Connect portal. Single sign on through the customer's own identity provider handles authentication. The product runs its own permission structure rather than applying a document management system's access model at query time, and Xakia does not say whether the AI features apply those permissions when they read documents.

Source: Vendor Publishedcontrol access at the individual user, team or matter levelAs of Aug 29, 2026Evidence

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Notice committed

Terms commit to notice where lawfully permitted. No transparency report located.

Xakia's data processing addendum commits it to inform the subscriber promptly of any third party request made directly to Xakia about its processing of the subscriber's personal data, with details of the request. The commitment applies to the extent the law permits. Third party requests include those from a regulatory authority. Xakia will not respond to such a request without prior notice to the subscriber and a chance to object, except where the law requires it or to confirm that the request relates to that subscriber. The commitment covers personal data under the addendum, and Xakia issues no transparency report.

Source: Operator VerifiedXakia will promptly inform Subscriber and provide details of the sameAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Not addressed

No located public material identifies the corpus behind the product’s answers.

Xakia holds no legal content collection. Its AI features work on the customer's own contracts, documents and invoices in the platform, so the material and its provenance are the customer's. Contract review applies the customer's own playbook and also checks a contract against governing law, market practice and basic drafting standards, without naming where that knowledge comes from. Xakia supplies no licensed legal content and states no license basis or update cadence for the knowledge its model applies.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Aug 29, 2026

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

Xakia manages an in house team's matters, contracts and spend rather than case law, so a citator sits outside the product. Its AI reviews and summarizes the customer's own contracts and extracts key terms, and Smart Search works across the customer's own documents. Keeping contract standards in step with changes in law is the legal team's work, and the AI addendum makes users responsible for checking that output is accurate and up to date.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 9, 2026

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Confidence signal only

The product exposes a confidence or grounding score without an explicit abstention path.

Xakia's key terms extraction returns each value with a confidence score, the clause it came from and the exact text it relied on. A user reviews and corrects each value before clicking Apply, so nothing reaches the contract repository unchecked. Contract review flags deviations from the playbook for a lawyer to decide, and Smart Search shows the query it built so a user can check and correct it. Xakia describes no path for declining a request when a document holds no answer, such as a key term the contract does not contain.

The AI addendum tells users to validate or ignore output using their own professional judgment, because it may not be accurate or up to date.

Source: Operator Verifiedeach with a confidence score, the clause it came fromAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by Damien Charlotin, which records court decisions worldwide that address hallucinated AI content and the tool involved where known, has no entry naming Xakia. Xakia's AI produces contract redlines, summaries and extracted terms from the customer's own documents rather than court filings.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Generic reference

Public materials refer to professional responsibility in general terms without naming guidance.

Xakia's AI addendum refers to professional duties in general terms. It requires the AI features to be used only by or under the direct supervision of legal practitioners in accordance with applicable professional conduct rules. It also bars automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals without proper human review in compliance with applicable professional ethics, guidelines and rules.

Neither the addendum nor Xakia's site names a bar opinion, such as ABA Formal Opinion 512, or guidance from the Law Council of Australia or a state law society, in Xakia's home market. Xakia's in house hub covers evaluating matter management software and legal operations practice.

Source: Operator Verifiedin accordance with applicable professional conduct rulesAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Fee record is the product

The buyer is the payer, not the biller. The product exists to review, author or benchmark legal fees, so the record of fees is the product itself rather than a byproduct of AI assisted lawyering. Typically sold to in-house teams paying outside counsel.

Xakia's spend module is the payer's record of outside counsel fees. Outside firms accept work, update matter details and submit invoices through the Connect portal, which they use at no charge, and the legal team tracks spend against matter budgets in any currency. Xakia sets no limits on the number of firms, invoices or spend managed. It takes no percentage of invoices, which it calls a clip of the ticket, so its revenue does not grow with a customer's legal spend.

Budget tracking compares forecasts with spend to reduce overspend. AI invoice review is listed in the plan comparison as coming soon. How firms bill AI assisted work is left to the customer's own billing terms.

Source: Vendor Publishedno 'clip of the ticket' based on your external legal spendAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Subprocessors listed

A current subprocessor or model provider list is published.

Xakia's trust center publishes its subprocessor list, in effect since 1 April 2024, with each provider's country and purpose, including ChurnZero, HubSpot, Intercom, Microsoft, Stripe, Twilio and Xero, and keeps the earlier lists. The data processing agreement is downloadable there, and the ISO 27001:2022 certificate, a penetration test attestation and the SOC 2 Type 2 report are available on request. The AI addendum refers to third party AI tools without naming them.

No AI model provider appears on the subprocessor list, so Xakia's documents leave the provider behind the AI features unnamed for a client who asks. Restriction by matter and the limited outside counsel view in Connect control who sees client material.

Source: Vendor PublishedXakia uses ChurnZero to monitor and communicate with customers and users about account activityAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Partial record

Some elements of the record are available, short of a document level export.

Xakia keeps parts of the record a court or client might ask for. Extracted key terms carry the clause they came from and the exact text relied on, and reach the contract repository only after a user reviews them and clicks Apply. Xakia's AI page says each decision a user takes on an invoice review finding lands in the audit trail. The platform also records matter activity, intake routing and spend against each matter.

No export ties an AI output to the model used, and no model is named. Xakia's output is internal records, contracts and reporting rather than court filings, so a judicial order on AI disclosure is less likely to reach it.

Source: Operator Verifiedevery decision lands in the audit trailAs of Oct 9, 2026Evidence
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 430 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 14, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746