H
Harvey alternatives and competitors

The closest alternatives to Harvey are Legora, CoCounsel Legal, Lexis+ with Protégé and Vincent AI.

Harvey is an AI platform for large and mid sized law firms and in house legal departments. Its agents plan multistep legal work and show the plan for a lawyer to approve. Vault reviews up to 100,000 documents in a table, Knowledge researches across more than 500 legal sources with LexisNexis case law through Ask LexisNexis, and Legal Work Orchestration sets review gates across a matter. There is no price list, and Harvey's help center puts the average at several hundred dollars per user per month.

The alternatives below differ from Harvey in three ways: the content the AI reasons from, the buyer it is built for, and whether a price is public before a sales call.

The list

9 alternatives to Harvey

Starting prices are as each vendor publishes them, in its own currency and billing unit.

  1. L

    Legora

    Agents tied to time entries and client delivery

    The closest like for like rival at large firms: an agent that plans and checks multistep work across documents, email, research and data rooms, Tabular Review with a source behind every cell, and Word and Outlook add ins. Completed tasks can become time entries by client and matter in Intapp Time, Laurel or PointOne, and Portal delivers work to clients under the firm's brand. It charges a platform fee plus credits.

  2. C

    CoCounsel Legal

    Built on Westlaw and Practical Law

    Thomson Reuters' agentic assistant plans a matter step by step and answers from Westlaw and Practical Law as well as the firm's own files, with Westlaw Brief Builder and tabular review of up to 10,000 documents. It is sold in plans bundled with Westlaw, and prices are published online for firms of up to 10 attorneys, from $292.50 a month for CoCounsel Essentials on a three year plan.

  3. L

    Lexis+ with Protégé

    LexisNexis research with Shepard's checks

    LexisNexis's assistant, now sold as Lexis+ with Protégé, researches, drafts and summarizes over LexisNexis case law, statutes and Practical Guidance. Citations are checked against Shepard's, and Shepard's Verify flags unsupported statements in a draft. It connects to iManage, SharePoint and NetDocuments so answers can draw on a firm's own documents.

    Starting price: No published figure
  4. V

    Vincent AI

    The vLex library and litigation analytics

    Built by vLex, now owned by Clio, on a library of more than a billion legal documents from more than 100 countries, with more than 20 workflows such as 50 state surveys, pleading analysis and redline analysis. Profiles of judges, lawyers and parties draw on more than 850 million court records, and every answer is checked by Cert, Clio's citator. It connects to Word, Outlook and iManage.

    Starting price: No published figure
  5. G

    GC AI

    Built for in house teams, sold online

    Made only for in house legal departments: chat, a Word add in that redlines against the team's playbooks, and Contract Intelligence across a portfolio synced from Google Drive, SharePoint, Dropbox or Ironclad. Exact Quote ties each answer to highlighted source text. One lawyer can buy a seat online for $500 a month after a 14 day trial.

  6. S

    Spellbook

    Contract drafting inside Word

    Drafting, review and contract questions inside Microsoft Word and Google Docs, with tracked edits against the team's playbooks and benchmarks of contract language against market terms. Associate works across several files, and an iManage connection keeps existing permissions and ethical walls. It is priced per user, with a seven day trial.

    Starting price: No published figure
  7. L

    Luminance

    Contract negotiation across the business

    Built for contracts across legal and the business: it proposes markups in Word from approved positions and earlier concessions, routes nonstandard terms back to legal, and analyzes the whole repository against the organization's standards. External Sources brings cited research from LexisNexis Protégé and the web into its answers.

    Starting price: No published figure
  8. H

    Hebbia

    Document analysis for transactional work

    Matrix breaks a question into steps across thousands of uploaded documents and returns a grid, one row per document and one column per question, with sources in each cell. It is sold to law firms alongside investment banks and asset managers, for due diligence, credit agreements, capital markets drafting and fund formation, and is licensed per seat.

    Starting price: No published figure
  9. E

    Eudia

    Company playbooks at enterprise scale

    Built for in house legal and procurement teams at large companies and for US government legal teams. It turns a company's playbooks, approved language and past decisions into what it calls digital twins, which redline in Word, answer questions across more than 100,000 agreements and review marketing assets against approved claims. Forward deployed lawyers and engineers build the workflows with the customer.

    Starting price: Not yet recordedHarvey vs Eudia →
Also compared with

More Harvey head to heads

Side by side comparisons of Harvey with products not listed above.

Questions

Harvey alternatives, answered

What are the best alternatives to Harvey?

Legora is the closest like for like rival at large firms, with agents, tabular review and a time entry for each completed task. CoCounsel Legal and Lexis+ with Protégé ground their answers in Westlaw and LexisNexis content, and Vincent AI draws on the vLex library. For in house teams, GC AI sells a seat online for $500 a month, and Eudia is built for large legal departments. For contract work alone, Spellbook and Luminance work inside Word.

Who are Harvey's competitors?

At law firms Harvey competes with Legora, CoCounsel Legal from Thomson Reuters, Lexis+ with Protégé from LexisNexis and Vincent AI from Clio. In in house legal departments it competes with GC AI and Eudia. In contract work it competes with Spellbook and Luminance, and in document analysis for transactions with Hebbia.

Is Harvey more expensive than CoCounsel?

Harvey publishes no price list. Its help center says the average is several hundred dollars per user per month. Thomson Reuters publishes CoCounsel prices online for firms of up to 10 attorneys: CoCounsel Essentials is $360 a month for one attorney on a one year plan, and CoCounsel Legal with Westlaw and Practical Law is $784.

Which Harvey alternative publishes its price?

GC AI sells one seat online at $500 a month after a 14 day trial, and Thomson Reuters publishes CoCounsel prices for firms of up to 10 attorneys. Legora, Lexis+ with Protégé, Hebbia and Eudia quote each customer, as Harvey does.

Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 465 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
November 10, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746