T
Trust & Will

Trust & Will is an online estate planning service from Huge Legal Technology Company, a public benefit corporation based in San Diego. Consumers build wills and trust plans for their state through a guided online interview, with an optional flat fee Attorney Support service or an Attorney Led Plan from its network of licensed estate attorneys. An annual subscription adds AI answers, a digital vault and plan updates, and a probate service is also offered.

Its EstateOS platform extends to attorneys, with AI document extraction, estate plan summaries and an AI assistant for managing client plans and referrals, and to financial advisors and nonprofits. Trust & Will is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. Will plans start at $199 and trust plans at $499.

Compared with

Trust & Will, head to head

Side by side on the same 15 capability axes and 12 legal signals: where the two part company, and what neither one publishes.

Build your own comparison

Capability grades

All 15 axes, graded from public sources on the date shown. Hover a grade to see what the letter means on that axis.

CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is present but peripheral: a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it.

AI Centrality

How much of the product is actually AI. Whether the machine learning is the mechanism the buyer is paying for or a feature layered onto conventional software, and whether the vendor is specific about which is which.

Consumers build wills and trusts through a guided interview that does not depend on models. AI appears in the annual subscription's answers and plan recommendations, and in the attorney and adviser portals as document extraction, estate plan summaries and an AI assistant.

Source: Vendor Published
DD on Citation Accuracy and Hallucination DisclosureNothing published on accuracy or grounding for a product that produces legal assertions, or a bare claim that the system does not hallucinate.

Citation Accuracy and Hallucination Disclosure

Whether the vendor publishes measured accuracy on citations and assertions, grounds output to primary sources, and says plainly what its system does when it does not know. Legal has a documented public record of fabricated citations reaching filed briefs, so an untested claim of accuracy is not evidence.

The home, Attorneys, Advisors and Compare pages publish nothing on the accuracy of AI answers, extractions or summaries, and the terms warn that AI output may not be accurate.

Source: Operator Verified
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.

Autonomy and Oversight Model

What the system decides on its own, what a lawyer must approve, and whether the vendor documents where the review point sits. A tool that drafts under review and a tool that files without one are different products and different risks.

Estate plan summaries generated by AI can be edited before sharing, and the terms place responsibility for input and reliance on the user. No step requires a person to check an AI answer given to a consumer, and no limit is set on what the AI assistant may do.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Operational and Outcome EvidenceCustomer logos and unattributed testimonials stand in for evidence, or results are quoted with no basis stated.

Operational and Outcome Evidence

Named, dated evidence that the product works in production at real firms or legal departments. Case studies with figures and identified customers count. Unattributed testimonials and launch announcements do not.

The site cites reviews from members identified by first name, adviser results such as assets under management identified and revenue generated, and more than 20,000 advisers using the platform. No named law firm or attorney customer with measured results is published.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Privilege and Confidentiality PostureConfidentiality is asserted in general terms, or the commitment lives only in a sales conversation and cannot be read in advance.

Privilege and Confidentiality Posture

How client confidences are handled: attorney client privilege and work product treatment, segregation of one client matter from another, whether client data trains any model, and what the vendor commits to in writing rather than in marketing.

External models are barred from training on estate plan and account content, while AI output may be used to improve the services, and nothing covers the company's own models. The security page describes encryption and independent examinations. Privilege and confidentiality for attorneys' client files uploaded to the platform are not addressed.

Source: Vendor Published
AA on UPL and Professional Responsibility PostureThe vendor states plainly what the product is and is not, who may use it, and how it supports a lawyer’s competence and supervision duties. Jurisdiction limits are named and any consumer facing surface carries a clear disclosure.

UPL and Professional Responsibility Posture

Whether the vendor is clear that it supplies a tool rather than legal advice, who its audience is, and how it addresses unauthorized practice of law, competence and supervision duties, and jurisdiction limits. ABA Formal Opinion 512 is the reference point. Where the advice line is not the duty a product raises, the axis is read through the nearest professional duty it does raise: judicial conduct rules and the reviewing duty for products sold only to courts, and the duty to bill for time actually spent for products that draft time entries.

Every page carries a notice that Trust & Will is an online service providing legal forms and information, is not a law firm, does not give legal advice and is no substitute for an attorney. The Terms of Service say the same and limit use to adults. Consumers can add Attorney Support at a flat fee, with a licensed attorney in their state and the states where it is unavailable named, or choose an Attorney Led Plan. Documents are described as specific to each state and built by estate planning attorneys.

Source: Vendor Published
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNo governance position published for a system whose output affects legal outcomes.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure

Published governance over model behavior: who owns it inside the vendor, what is tested before release, and what is disclosed about disparate output across matter types, parties, or populations.

The main site pages, the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy publish no AI governance framework, accountable owner, testing before release, or finding on how AI answers or summaries perform.

Source: Operator Verified
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipSubstantive published policy covering most of the ground, short of the full set: commonly no named subprocessor list or no stated incident practice.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship

Retention, deletion, access control, and what happens to prompts and documents after they are processed. Whether the vendor states its subprocessors and its incident practice, or leaves the buyer to assume.

The security page describes AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.2 in transit, AWS hosting and automatic session logouts, and says customers own their data. The Privacy Policy has a section headed Retention of your data. No subprocessor list or incident notification commitment is published.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on AI Liability and RecourseLiability is addressed only through a standard limitation clause that disclaims the exposure the product creates.

AI Liability and Recourse

What the vendor stands behind contractually when its output is wrong. Indemnities, caps, carve outs, insurance, and whether any of it is published or only reachable through a negotiated agreement.

The Terms of Service exclude liability for any direct, indirect or other damages arising from use of the services, subject AI output to the general disclaimers, and require disputes to go to mandatory arbitration with a class action waiver. No warranty or remedy covers a document or AI answer that proves wrong.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Practice Systems Integration DepthIntegrations are listed as logos or marked as coming, with no documentation an implementer could use.

Practice Systems Integration Depth

How deeply the product reaches into the systems legal work already lives in: document management such as iManage and NetDocuments, Word and Outlook, contract lifecycle management, matter management, e-billing, and court filing systems.

The attorney platform supports bulk document uploads and referral tracking, and advisers can upload client documents for AI summaries. The attorney and adviser pages name no connection to an attorney's practice management, document management or drafting system.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud delivery is implied and neither the tenancy model nor the region is stated.

Deployment Model and Data Residency

Where the software runs and where the data sits. Multi tenant cloud, single tenant, private deployment, on premises, and whether region of residence is a published option or an enterprise conversation.

Amazon Web Services hosts the platform, and the security page describes AWS components with encryption at rest and in transit. No hosting region, tenancy model or processing location for AI features is given.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertification is real and stated, short of accessible evidence: a named standard without scope, date, or a way to obtain the report.

Security Certifications and Trust Center

Independent attestation a buyer can pull without a sales call: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test summaries, a trust center with current reports and named scope rather than a badge image.

The security page says Trust & Will has undergone SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA examinations resulting in an independent CPA's report. No auditor, period, trust center or way to obtain the report is published.

Source: Vendor Published
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe vendor refers to advanced or proprietary models without identifying what sits underneath.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure

Which models sit underneath, whose they are, where they run, and whether the vendor commits to telling customers when that changes. A legal buyer inherits every dependency it cannot see.

Per the Terms of Service, the AI features may use external models or AI software tools. No model, provider, inference location or change notification is named.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Commercial TransparencyReal pricing is published for part of the range, with enterprise tiers withheld, or the unit and structure are stated without the figure.

Commercial Transparency

Whether a buyer can learn what this costs without entering a sales process: published rates, the unit being charged, what sits behind an enterprise tier, and what implementation adds.

The Compare page lists the consumer plans, the Attorney Support fee and the annual subscription, and the Advisors page lists flat annual adviser plans. The Attorney Led Plan carries no listed price, and the attorney platform has no published price.

Source: Vendor Published
BB on Firm and Practice CoverageSegment and practice coverage is described with substance, short of the boundaries: what is supported is clear, what is not is left open.

Firm and Practice Coverage

Who the product is actually built for. AmLaw, midlaw, small firm and solo, in house departments, government and courts, and which practice areas are supported rather than merely claimed.

The site addresses consumers planning wills, trusts, guardianship and probate, estate planning attorneys, financial advisers and nonprofits, and Attorney Support is not available in some named states. Which document types or family situations the online plans do not handle is not stated.

Source: Vendor Published
Sources on file

3 public documents

The public pages on file for Trust & Will, with the recorded signals each one supports and the date it was last read. Open any of them and check the reading against the record.

Pricing

$199 (Will Plan, starting price)

USD, as published, never converted
  • A will plan starts at $199 and a trust plan at $499.
  • You can add a live estate planning attorney for a flat $299.
  • The yearly subscription with AI answers and a digital vault costs $49.
  • A plan built for you by a matched attorney is priced individually.

Consumer prices are published: the Will Plan from $199 and the Trust Plan from $499. Attorney Support costs a flat $299, with a licensed attorney in the consumer's state, and is unavailable in some states. The annual subscription costs $49 a year and includes AI answers, a digital vault and one free document shipment a year. The Attorney Led Plan is priced individually. Adviser plans are published on the Advisors page as flat annual fees, for example up to 25 plans for one annual fee, with a premium tier priced per seat.

Implementation: None published for consumers.

Confidentiality and data terms: The security page says Trust & Will has undergone a HIPAA examination and refers to no Business Associate Agreement.

Note: Prices shown are starting prices for individuals and do not include couples' pricing or state variations. The attorney platform has no published price. The Terms of Service include mandatory arbitration.

Legal Signals

What each signal means

A signal records what public sources say on the date shown. It is not a grade and it is not a recommendation. Where a signal reads Not addressed, it means the index did not locate the material in public sources on that date, which is a statement about disclosure rather than about the product.

Confidentiality and Privilege

Client Data in Training

Can material a lawyer puts into this product be used to train a model?

Terms silent

A published agreement or policy exists and none of it addresses the question either way, or the document that would answer it could not be read and the summary names the retrieval limit. The summary states which shape the silence takes: an improvement right granted that never names training, or no improvement right granted at all.

The Terms of Service bar training external AI models on estate plan or account content, and reserve the use of content generated through AI features to provide, maintain, develop and improve the services. The terms do not address training Trust & Will's own models, and the improvement right does not name training.

Source: Vendor PublishedWe do not use any of your Estate Plan Content or Account Content to train external AI models.As of Sep 22, 2026Evidence

Prompt and Output Retention

How long does the product keep what a lawyer typed, and can that be set to zero?

Not addressed

No located public material states how long prompts and outputs are retained.

The Privacy Policy has a section headed Retention of your data. The security page and the Terms of Service state no retention period for documents, AI inputs or outputs.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Ethical Walls and Matter Segregation

Does retrieval respect the firm’s ethical walls, or can the model read across them?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses walls or matter level segregation.

The Attorneys, Advisors and Security pages describe no separation of client files between matters or users within an attorney's or adviser's account.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Third Party Request and Subpoena Notice

If someone subpoenas the vendor for a firm’s data, does the firm hear about it first?

Not addressed

No located term or policy addresses third party requests for customer data.

Neither the Terms of Service nor the Privacy Policy outside its retention section addresses court or government requests for customer data.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026
Accuracy and Authority

Primary Law Corpus Provenance

Where does the law in this product come from, and does the vendor have the right to use it?

Not addressed

No located public material identifies the corpus behind the product’s answers.

The home, Compare and Attorney Support pages say attorneys built the documents and identify no source for the law or forms behind them, or for the material behind AI answers.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Good Law Verification

Does the product tell you when the authority it just cited has been overruled?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses whether authority is checked for subsequent history.

The product does not cite legal authority, and nothing addresses checking authority for later treatment.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Refusal and Uncertainty Behavior

What does the product do when the answer is not in the corpus?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses what the product does when it cannot ground an answer.

The main site pages and terms do not describe what the AI answers or assistant do when a question needs an attorney or cannot be answered. Attorney Support is sold separately.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Fabricated Citation Record

Does a public court record exist addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations in output from this product?

None located

No court order, opinion or disciplinary record addressing fabricated or hallucinated legal citations produced by this product has been located as of the date shown. This is a statement about the public record on that one subject, not a finding about the product, and this signal is not a litigation history.

The AI Hallucination Cases database kept by Damien Charlotin holds no entry naming Trust & Will.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Nov 9, 2026Evidence
Professional Responsibility

Bar Guidance Alignment

Has the vendor engaged in public with the ethics opinions its buyers are bound by?

Not addressed

No located public material engages with bar or ethics guidance.

The Attorneys, Attorney Support and Security pages and the terms address no professional obligation for attorneys using the platform's AI and name no ethics opinion.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Billing and Fee Posture

Does the vendor address what happens to the bill when the work takes an hour instead of six?

Outside the fee relationship

The product does not touch a fee between a lawyer and a client. It operates before an engagement exists, or it is bought by a team that bills no client for the work. Savings claims aimed at the buyer’s own cost are recorded in the summary and do not make the row a savings claim, because no client bill is in the loop.

Consumers buy their own will or trust plan directly at published prices, outside any fee relationship with a lawyer; optional Attorney Support is a flat fee paid to Trust & Will. The attorney platform's effect on attorneys' fees is not addressed.

Source: Vendor PublishedAs of Sep 22, 2026Evidence

Outside Counsel Guideline Readiness

Can a firm get this vendor through a client’s AI clause without a bespoke negotiation?

Not addressed

No located public material supports a client side disclosure obligation.

The Security page, the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy give no subprocessor or model provider list and no disclosure material for clients.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026

Court Disclosure Support

If a judge’s standing order requires an AI disclosure, can the product produce one?

Not addressed

No located public material addresses court disclosure or verification certification.

The products produce estate planning documents rather than court filings, and the estate planning pages do not address recording or disclosing AI use. Trust & Will also sells a separate probate service.

Source: Operator VerifiedAs of Sep 22, 2026
Contact

Correct a record, or ask how something was graded

Every grade and every signal on this index is drawn from public sources and dated. If a record is wrong, out of date, or missing an artifact the index did not locate, send the source and it will be reviewed and the record redated. Vendors are welcome to submit documentation. Nothing on this index is for sale, including a listing, a placement, or a grade.

AI Legal Index

The AI Legal Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in legal. It holds 465 vendors across 9 categories, each graded on the same 15 capability axes and recorded against 12 legal signals, from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
November 10, 2026
The AI Legal Index is an editorial reference. It is not a regulatory body, not a law firm, and nothing published here is legal advice or a recommendation to retain or avoid a vendor. Records are verified against published sources, bar guidance and public court records. Where a record reads not addressed, the material was not located in public sources on the date shown. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI Legal Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746