G

Gavel

The models are the product for one of the two lines and optional for the other. Gavel Exec is built on AI: review, redlining against playbooks, drafting, market benchmarking and document chat are all model output. Gavel Workflows is rules based document automation with conditional logic, and the security page says its AI features, including AI onboarding for Workflows, are entirely optional and that many customers use the automation without enabling AI.

Gavel Exec combines semantic retrieval with matching of text across customer precedents, matter files, EDGAR, government sources, and the open web. Its described analysis considers exact wording, conceptual similarity, and source verification. Answers and revisions include explanations intended to help a lawyer validate the result. That architecture provides a basis for tracing contract analysis, but the public claim that the product flags five times more issues than manual review has no reproducible sample or method.

Market benchmarking also requires judgment about comparable agreements. Gavel does not publish a detailed failure analysis showing where extraction, clause interpretation, or proposed revisions become unreliable.

Proposed redlines and negotiation comments appear within Word, where the lawyer can review and revise them. Playbooks supply preferred positions, and explanations help a user assess why a change was suggested. Projects keep instructions and reference files together, while shared Workspaces support team use. The terms require users of experimental features to review and verify results and warn that those outputs may be incomplete or incorrect.

These are identifiable review surfaces and responsibilities. The materials do not define a confidence based stopping rule, a required escalation route for an unsupported answer, or a recovery process after an erroneous revision has been accepted.

Martin Algie of MIA Contract Lawyers describes using Gavel Exec for negotiation and redlining, with an attributed account of how it fits his work. Gavel also identifies more than 2,000 law firms and legal teams using its products. A separate Streeter Law Firm account describes preparing an estate plan in 30 minutes through Gavel Workflows. That outcome concerns rules based document automation and does not isolate an AI effect.

The available examples establish recognizable users and practical use cases, but do not provide a dated, controlled before and after evaluation of Exec's accuracy, review completeness, or total professional effort.

Customer prompts and document content are not used for training, and AI providers, including OpenAI, operate under zero retention agreements, Gavel states. Customers have separate databases and file storage, with controls over whether Workflows data persists. The incorporated privacy policy nevertheless permits analysis of anonymized builder questions to improve questionnaire suggestions, while expressly excluding the answers.

That narrower content permission requires attention alongside the general no training statement. Project access controls are asserted without a complete matter segregation model. The terms also distinguish the software relationship from privileged communications with a lawyer, leaving the firm responsible for protecting client confidences.

Gavel's terms state that the company is not a law firm, supplies no legal advice, creates no attorney client relationship, and takes no share of legal fees. Users remain responsible for professional conduct requirements, including unauthorized practice, communications, and confidentiality. This distinction is relevant to Workflows, which lets firms offer client intake and paid legal services through their own interfaces.

The lawyer must establish the client relationship and appropriate disclosures. Exec supplies suggestions for review, while experimental features carry an express verification responsibility. The materials do not map competence duties or legal coverage across each jurisdiction served.

Principles without a mechanism. The security page says the AI is built with legal professionals in mind, putting security, privacy and control first, and that AI is optional. The Gavel Exec information page says the product is trained by practicing deal lawyers. No owner, testing before release, evaluation or finding about uneven output is published.

Customers can decide whether Workflows data is stored and can delete stored information immediately. AI provider processing is described as transient under zero retention agreements, while the terms provide a seven day reactivation period after cancellation before account deletion, subject to legal exceptions. The privacy policy adds backup, audit, and dispute exceptions. Security measures include separate customer storage, encryption, two factor authentication, single sign on, and annual external testing.

OpenAI is identified among AI providers, but no complete subprocessor register is published. The materials also do not give customers a specific incident notification timetable covering every class of content held by the service.

The August 19, 2025 terms disclaim warranties that output will be accurate, current, complete, or suitable for the user's needs. They place reliance on platform information at the user's risk and separately warn that beta and preview features can produce incomplete or incorrect results. Aggregate liability is limited to the greater of $100 or the fees paid for the relevant product during the preceding twelve months. The customer owes an indemnity for specified claims, while no reciprocal AI output indemnity is offered. These provisions allocate ordinary service risk without a warranty that generated legal language will be correct.

Exec places proposed revisions and comments in Word. Workflows connects document generation to Clio Manage, Docusign, Zapier, DecisionVault, and LegalServer. Clio contacts, matters, custom fields, and billing codes can populate intake, and completed files can return to a matter. Docusign supports variables for recipient details, ordered signers, signature status, and return of completed agreements. DecisionVault fields can be mapped into questionnaires, while LegalServer supports case data and return through a webhook.

These are described data movements and configuration choices. The public overview does not provide a complete setup procedure or permission synchronization specification for each connector.

Each customer gets a separate subdomain, database, and file storage in the hosted service. The default storage location is in Amazon Web Services facilities in the United States, with other hosting regions offered in the European Union, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere in AWS. The terms nevertheless obtain consent to processing in the United States, and the public regional hosting offer does not map each AI provider's processing location.

A chosen storage region therefore does not fix where every model operation runs. Firms with residency requirements need the configured service and processing agreement to specify that boundary.

Gavel now states that Gavel Exec has SOC 2 Type II attestation covering security, availability, and confidentiality. The scope is the Exec product; AWS infrastructure has its own separate certifications. The security materials also describe annual external testing, secure development practices, employee training, encryption, and authentication controls. A Type II examination concerns operation of controls over a period, but the public page does not expose the report date, examination period, auditor, or full report.

Procurement teams can request additional vendor documentation. The attestation statement should not be extended automatically to every Workflows feature or treated as an evaluation of legal output quality.

One provider is named, without the full set, the models or change notice. The security page and Privacy Policy say Gavel holds zero data retention agreements with the AI models it uses, including OpenAI, so one provider and its retention position are stated. Other providers, the models and versions, and where they run are not. The Gavel Exec information page describes the architecture: hybrid semantic and full text retrieval, trained on precedent. No commitment to notify customers of changes is made.

Pricing for Gavel Exec is $160 per user each month or $1,740 per user billed annually, with 1,000 monthly completions. A trial includes 25 requests per user, and teams of at least ten can request pricing. Workflows starts at $83 monthly for Lite, with Pro advertised at $290 and Scale from $417 monthly when billed annually. Its public pricing sections show conflicting Standard figures of $210 and $165, so that tier needs confirmation.

General onboarding and training are advertised as free, while custom automation work can require a separate quote. The products have different allowances and should not be treated as one combined subscription.

Transactional attorneys, corporate legal teams, and in house counsel working on commercial agreements, corporate matters, and real estate are the users of Gavel Exec. Gavel Workflows addresses repeatable document production across estate planning, probate, family law, bankruptcy, employment, corporate work, and property matters. Its customers range from solo practices to larger firms and legal startups. Court forms and legal templates extend the automation product beyond negotiated contracts, while client portals support direct intake.

The company describes use across multiple countries, but does not define the legal reliability of every AI feature by jurisdiction or identify a complete set of unsupported practice areas.